Explainable Intrusion Detection Systems (X-IDS): A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.06236v1
• Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 14:31:46 GMT
• Title: Explainable Intrusion Detection Systems (X-IDS): A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities
• Authors: Subash Neupane and Jesse Ables and William Anderson and Sudip Mittal and Shahram Rahimi and Ioana Banicescu and Maria Seale
• Abstract summary: Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) have received widespread adoption due to their ability to handle vast amounts of data with a high prediction accuracy. IDSs designed using Deep Learning (DL) techniques are often treated as black box models and do not provide a justification for their predictions. This survey reviews the state-of-the-art in explainable AI (XAI) for IDS, its current challenges, and discusses how these challenges span to the design of an X-IDS.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) to cybersecurity challenges has gained traction in industry and academia, partially as a result of widespread malware attacks on critical systems such as cloud infrastructures and government institutions. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), using some forms of AI, have received widespread adoption due to their ability to handle vast amounts of data with a high prediction accuracy. These systems are hosted in the organizational Cyber Security Operation Center (CSoC) as a defense tool to monitor and detect malicious network flow that would otherwise impact the Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (CIA). CSoC analysts rely on these systems to make decisions about the detected threats. However, IDSs designed using Deep Learning (DL) techniques are often treated as black box models and do not provide a justification for their predictions. This creates a barrier for CSoC analysts, as they are unable to improve their decisions based on the model's predictions. One solution to this problem is to design explainable IDS (X-IDS). This survey reviews the state-of-the-art in explainable AI (XAI) for IDS, its current challenges, and discusses how these challenges span to the design of an X-IDS. In particular, we discuss black box and white box approaches comprehensively. We also present the tradeoff between these approaches in terms of their performance and ability to produce explanations. Furthermore, we propose a generic architecture that considers human-in-the-loop which can be used as a guideline when designing an X-IDS. Research recommendations are given from three critical viewpoints: the need to define explainability for IDS, the need to create explanations tailored to various stakeholders, and the need to design metrics to evaluate explanations.

Related papers

• Countering Autonomous Cyber Threats [40.00865970939829]
  Foundation Models present dual-use concerns broadly and within the cyber domain specifically. Recent research has shown the potential for these advanced models to inform or independently execute offensive cyberspace operations. This work evaluates several state-of-the-art FMs on their ability to compromise machines in an isolated network and investigates defensive mechanisms to defeat such AI-powered attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T22:46:44Z)
• Explainable AI-based Intrusion Detection System for Industry 5.0: An Overview of the Literature, associated Challenges, the existing Solutions, and Potential Research Directions [3.99098935469955]
  Industry 5.0 focuses on human and Artificial Intelligence (AI) collaboration for performing different tasks in manufacturing. The huge involvement of these devices and interconnection in various critical areas, such as economy, health, education and defense systems, poses several types of potential security flaws. XAI has been proven a very effective and powerful tool in different areas of cybersecurity, such as intrusion detection, malware detection, and phishing detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-21T09:28:05Z)
• Analyzing Adversarial Inputs in Deep Reinforcement Learning [53.3760591018817]
  We present a comprehensive analysis of the characterization of adversarial inputs, through the lens of formal verification. We introduce a novel metric, the Adversarial Rate, to classify models based on their susceptibility to such perturbations. Our analysis empirically demonstrates how adversarial inputs can affect the safety of a given DRL system with respect to such perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T21:58:40Z)
• X-CBA: Explainability Aided CatBoosted Anomal-E for Intrusion Detection System [2.556190321164248]
  Using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models in Intrusion Detection Systems has led to a trust deficit due to their non-transparent decision-making. This paper introduces a novel Explainable IDS approach, called X-CBA, that leverages the structural advantages of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to effectively process network traffic data. Our approach achieves high accuracy with 99.47% in threat detection and provides clear, actionable explanations of its analytical outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T18:29:16Z)
• A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Cybersecurity [14.648580959079787]
  Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims to create machine learning models that can provide clear and interpretable explanations for their decisions and actions. In the field of network cybersecurity, XAI has the potential to revolutionize the way we approach network security by enabling us to better understand the behavior of cyber threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T22:54:18Z)
• Unfooling Perturbation-Based Post Hoc Explainers [12.599362066650842]
  Recent work demonstrates that perturbation-based post hoc explainers can be fooled adversarially. This discovery has adverse implications for auditors, regulators, and other sentinels. In this work, we rigorously formalize this problem and devise a defense against adversarial attacks on perturbation-based explainers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-29T21:28:12Z)
• On the Importance of Domain-specific Explanations in AI-based Cybersecurity Systems (Technical Report) [7.316266670238795]
  Lack of understanding of such decisions can be a major drawback in critical domains such as those related to cybersecurity. In this paper we make three contributions: (i) proposal and discussion of desiderata for the explanation of outputs generated by AI-based cybersecurity systems; (ii) a comparative analysis of approaches in the literature on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) under the lens of both our desiderata and further dimensions that are typically used for examining XAI approaches; and (iii) a general architecture that can serve as a roadmap for guiding research efforts towards the development of explainable AI-based cybersecurity systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-02T22:55:13Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)
• Inspect, Understand, Overcome: A Survey of Practical Methods for AI Safety [54.478842696269304]
  The use of deep neural networks (DNNs) in safety-critical applications is challenging due to numerous model-inherent shortcomings. In recent years, a zoo of state-of-the-art techniques aiming to address these safety concerns has emerged. Our paper addresses both machine learning experts and safety engineers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-29T09:54:54Z)
• A new interpretable unsupervised anomaly detection method based on residual explanation [47.187609203210705]
  We present RXP, a new interpretability method to deal with the limitations for AE-based AD in large-scale systems. It stands out for its implementation simplicity, low computational cost and deterministic behavior. In an experiment using data from a real heavy-haul railway line, the proposed method achieved superior performance compared to SHAP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-14T15:35:45Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.