Quantum Bayes' Rule Affirms Consistency in Measurement Inferences in Quantum Mechanics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08623v1
• Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:14:50 GMT
• Title: Quantum Bayes' Rule Affirms Consistency in Measurement Inferences in Quantum Mechanics
• Authors: Mohit Lal Bera and Manabendra Nath Bera
• Abstract summary: We show that it is inadequate to establish correct correspondence between cause and effect in quantum mechanics. We introduce an input-output causal relation based on quantum Bayes' rule.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Classical Bayes' rule lays the foundation for the classical causal relation between cause (input) and effect (output). This causal relation is believed to be universally true for all physical processes. Here we show, on the contrary, that it is inadequate to establish correct correspondence between cause and effect in quantum mechanics. In fact, there are instances within the framework of quantum mechanics where the use of classical Bayes' rule leads to inconsistencies in quantum measurement inferences, such as Frauchiger-Renner's paradox. Similar inconsistency also appears in the context of Hardy's setup even after assuming quantum mechanics as a non-local theory. As a remedy, we introduce an input-output causal relation based on quantum Bayes' rule. It applies to general quantum processes even when a cause (or effect) is in coherent superposition with other causes (or effects), involves nonlocal correlations as allowed by quantum mechanics, and in the cases where causes belonging to one system induce effects in some other system as it happens in quantum measurement processes. This enables us to propose a resolution to the contradictions that appear in the context of Frauchiger-Renner's and Hardy's setups. Our results thereby affirm that quantum mechanics, equipped with quantum Bayes' rule, can indeed consistently explain the use of itself.

Related papers

• The composition rule for quantum systems is not the only possible one [0.0]
  We argue that the composition postulate deserves to be experimentally scrutinised independently of the other features of quantum theory. We formulate a family of operational theories that are solely distinguished from quantum theory by their system-composition rule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-24T19:31:13Z)
• Expressibility, entangling power and quantum average causal effect for causally indefinite circuits [37.69303106863453]
  We implement parameterized quantum circuits with definite and indefinite causal order. One of these is the expressibility, which measures how uniformly a given quantum circuit can reach the whole Hilbert space. We find a correlation between the quantum average causal effect and the entangling power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T13:53:02Z)
• What is "quantum" about quantum gravity? [0.0]
  We argue that if both the equivalence principle and quantum mechanics continue to survive experimental tests, that this favors epistemic'' interpretations of quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T21:19:50Z)
• A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
  We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device. Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z)
• Indefinite order in the interface of quantum mechanics and gravity [0.0]
  We discuss the notion of indefinite order, which first appears in an abstract generalization of Quantum Theory. We present how scenarios involving gravity in low energies could lead to indefinite order.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T01:16:27Z)
• Normal quantum channels and Markovian correlated two-qubit quantum errors [77.34726150561087]
  We study general normally'' distributed random unitary transformations. On the one hand, a normal distribution induces a unital quantum channel. On the other hand, the diffusive random walk defines a unital quantum process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T15:33:28Z)
• Schr\"odinger cat states of a 16-microgram mechanical oscillator [54.35850218188371]
  The superposition principle is one of the most fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. Here we demonstrate the preparation of a mechanical resonator with an effective mass of 16.2 micrograms in Schr"odinger cat states of motion. We show control over the size and phase of the superposition and investigate the decoherence dynamics of these states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-01T13:29:44Z)
• Quantifying Quantum Causal Influences [0.8399688944263843]
  We propose the quantum version of the most common causality quantifier, the average causal effect (ACE), measuring how much a target quantum system is changed by interventions on its presumed cause. Not only it offers an innate manner to quantify causation in two-qubit gates but also in alternative quantum computation models such as the measurement-based version. Considering quantum teleportation, we show that any pure entangled state offers an advantage in terms of causal effects as compared to separable states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-09T17:17:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Quantum Causal Inference in the Presence of Hidden Common Causes: an Entropic Approach [34.77250498401055]
  We put forth a new theoretical framework for merging quantum information science and causal inference by exploiting entropic principles. We apply our proposed framework to an experimentally relevant scenario of identifying message senders on quantum noisy links. This approach can lay the foundations of identifying originators of malicious activity on future multi-node quantum networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-24T22:45:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.