DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Development

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.10062v4
• Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 15:24:24 GMT
• Title: DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Development
• Authors: Mark Mazumder, Colby Banbury, Xiaozhe Yao, Bojan Karla\v{s}, William Gaviria Rojas, Sudnya Diamos, Greg Diamos, Lynn He, Alicia Parrish, Hannah Rose Kirk, Jessica Quaye, Charvi Rastogi, Douwe Kiela, David Jurado, David Kanter, Rafael Mosquera, Juan Ciro, Lora Aroyo, Bilge Acun, Lingjiao Chen, Mehul Smriti Raje, Max Bartolo, Sabri Eyuboglu, Amirata Ghorbani, Emmett Goodman, Oana Inel, Tariq Kane, Christine R. Kirkpatrick, Tzu-Sheng Kuo, Jonas Mueller, Tristan Thrush, Joaquin Vanschoren, Margaret Warren, Adina Williams, Serena Yeung, Newsha Ardalani, Praveen Paritosh, Lilith Bat-Leah, Ce Zhang, James Zou, Carole-Jean Wu, Cody Coleman, Andrew Ng, Peter Mattson, Vijay Janapa Reddi
• Abstract summary: DataPerf is a community-led benchmark suite for evaluating ML datasets and data-centric algorithms. We provide an open, online platform with multiple rounds of challenges to support this iterative development. The benchmarks, online evaluation platform, and baseline implementations are open source.
• Score: 81.03754002516862
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning research has long focused on models rather than datasets, and prominent datasets are used for common ML tasks without regard to the breadth, difficulty, and faithfulness of the underlying problems. Neglecting the fundamental importance of data has given rise to inaccuracy, bias, and fragility in real-world applications, and research is hindered by saturation across existing dataset benchmarks. In response, we present DataPerf, a community-led benchmark suite for evaluating ML datasets and data-centric algorithms. We aim to foster innovation in data-centric AI through competition, comparability, and reproducibility. We enable the ML community to iterate on datasets, instead of just architectures, and we provide an open, online platform with multiple rounds of challenges to support this iterative development. The first iteration of DataPerf contains five benchmarks covering a wide spectrum of data-centric techniques, tasks, and modalities in vision, speech, acquisition, debugging, and diffusion prompting, and we support hosting new contributed benchmarks from the community. The benchmarks, online evaluation platform, and baseline implementations are open source, and the MLCommons Association will maintain DataPerf to ensure long-term benefits to academia and industry.

Related papers

• Putting Data at the Centre of Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [3.623224034411137]
  offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is an exciting direction of research that uses static datasets to find optimal control policies for multi-agent systems. Though the field is by definition data-driven, efforts have thus far neglected data in their drive to achieve state-of-the-art results. We show how the majority of works generate their own datasets without consistent methodology and provide sparse information about the characteristics of these datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T14:13:24Z)
• Weak-Annotation of HAR Datasets using Vision Foundation Models [9.948823510429902]
  We propose a novel, clustering-based annotation pipeline to significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be annotated by a human annotator. We show that using our approach, the annotation of centroid clips suffices to achieve average labelling accuracies close to 90% across three publicly available HAR benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T16:46:53Z)
• DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language Models [50.36636396660163]
  We present DiscoveryBench, the first comprehensive benchmark that formalizes the multi-step process of data-driven discovery. Our benchmark contains 264 tasks collected across 6 diverse domains, such as sociology and engineering. Our benchmark, thus, illustrates the challenges in autonomous data-driven discovery and serves as a valuable resource for the community to make progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T18:58:22Z)
• Data-Centric AI in the Age of Large Language Models [51.20451986068925]
  This position paper proposes a data-centric viewpoint of AI research, focusing on large language models (LLMs) We make the key observation that data is instrumental in the developmental (e.g., pretraining and fine-tuning) and inferential stages (e.g., in-context learning) of LLMs. We identify four specific scenarios centered around data, covering data-centric benchmarks and data curation, data attribution, knowledge transfer, and inference contextualization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T16:34:07Z)
• Data Acquisition: A New Frontier in Data-centric AI [65.90972015426274]
  We first present an investigation of current data marketplaces, revealing lack of platforms offering detailed information about datasets. We then introduce the DAM challenge, a benchmark to model the interaction between the data providers and acquirers. Our evaluation of the submitted strategies underlines the need for effective data acquisition strategies in Machine Learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T22:15:17Z)
• LargeST: A Benchmark Dataset for Large-Scale Traffic Forecasting [65.71129509623587]
  Road traffic forecasting plays a critical role in smart city initiatives and has experienced significant advancements thanks to the power of deep learning. However, the promising results achieved on current public datasets may not be applicable to practical scenarios. We introduce the LargeST benchmark dataset, which includes a total of 8,600 sensors in California with a 5-year time coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T05:48:36Z)
• Quality In / Quality Out: Assessing Data quality in an Anomaly Detection Benchmark [0.13764085113103217]
  We show that relatively minor modifications on the same benchmark dataset (UGR'16, a flow-based real-traffic dataset for anomaly detection) cause significantly more impact on model performance than the specific Machine Learning technique considered. Our findings illustrate the need to devote more attention into (automatic) data quality assessment and optimization techniques in the context of autonomous networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T12:03:12Z)
• METAM: Goal-Oriented Data Discovery [9.73435089036831]
  METAM is a goal-oriented framework that queries the downstream task with a candidate dataset, forming a feedback loop that automatically steers the discovery and augmentation process. We show METAM's theoretical guarantees and demonstrate those empirically on a broad set of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T15:42:25Z)
• Rethinking Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning: Introducing a New Notion and Standard Benchmarks [65.34113135080105]
  We show that not only the issue of data heterogeneity in current setups is not necessarily a problem but also in fact it can be beneficial for the FL participants. Our observations are intuitive. Our code is available at https://github.com/MMorafah/FL-SC-NIID.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T17:15:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.