Investigating the Impact of Backward Strategy Learning in a Logic Tutor: Aiding Subgoal Learning towards Improved Problem Solving

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.04696v1
• Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:43:52 GMT
• Title: Investigating the Impact of Backward Strategy Learning in a Logic Tutor: Aiding Subgoal Learning towards Improved Problem Solving
• Authors: Preya Shabrina, Behrooz Mostafavi, Mark Abdelshiheed, Min Chi, Tiffany Barnes
• Abstract summary: The training session involved backward worked examples (BWE) and problem-solving (BPS) to help students learn backward strategy. Our results showed that, when new problems were given to solve without any tutor help, students who were trained with both BWE and BPS outperformed students who received none of the treatment or only BWE during training.
• Score: 6.639504127104268
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Learning to derive subgoals reduces the gap between experts and students and makes students prepared for future problem solving. Researchers have explored subgoal labeled instructional materials with explanations in traditional problem solving and within tutoring systems to help novices learn to subgoal. However, only a little research is found on problem-solving strategies in relationship with subgoal learning. Also, these strategies are under-explored within computer-based tutors and learning environments. Backward problem-solving strategy is closely related to the process of subgoaling, where problem solving iteratively refines the goal into a new subgoal to reduce difficulty. In this paper, we explore a training strategy for backward strategy learning within an intelligent logic tutor that teaches logic proof construction. The training session involved backward worked examples (BWE) and problem-solving (BPS) to help students learn backward strategy towards improving their subgoaling and problem-solving skills. To evaluate the training strategy, we analyzed students' 1) experience with and engagement in learning backward strategy, 2) performance, and 3) proof construction approaches in new problems that they solved independently without tutor help after each level of training and in post-test. Our results showed that, when new problems were given to solve without any tutor help, students who were trained with both BWE and BPS outperformed students who received none of the treatment or only BWE during training. Additionally, students trained with both BWE and BPS derived subgoals during proof construction with significantly higher efficiency than the other two groups.

Related papers

• YODA: Teacher-Student Progressive Learning for Language Models [82.0172215948963]
  This paper introduces YODA, a teacher-student progressive learning framework. It emulates the teacher-student education process to improve the efficacy of model fine-tuning. Experiments show that training LLaMA2 with data from YODA improves SFT with significant performance gain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T14:32:15Z)
• Causal Reinforcement Learning: A Survey [57.368108154871]
  Reinforcement learning is an essential paradigm for solving sequential decision problems under uncertainty. One of the main obstacles is that reinforcement learning agents lack a fundamental understanding of the world. Causality offers a notable advantage as it can formalize knowledge in a systematic manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T03:00:43Z)
• Bridging Declarative, Procedural, and Conditional Metacognitive Knowledge Gap Using Deep Reinforcement Learning [7.253181280137071]
  In deductive domains, three metacognitive knowledge types in ascending order are declarative, procedural, and conditional learning. This work leverages Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) in providing adaptive metacognitive interventions to bridge the gap between the three knowledge types. Our results show that on both ITSs, DRL bridged the metacognitive knowledge gap between students and significantly improved their learning performance over their control peers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-23T20:07:07Z)
• Leveraging Deep Reinforcement Learning for Metacognitive Interventions across Intelligent Tutoring Systems [7.253181280137071]
  This work compares two approaches to provide metacognitive interventions across Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) In two consecutive semesters, we conducted two classroom experiments: Exp. 1 used a classic artificial intelligence approach to classify students into different metacognitive groups and provide static interventions based on their classified groups. In Exp. 2, we leveraged Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) to provide adaptive interventions that consider the dynamic changes in the student's metacognitive levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T12:10:50Z)
• Reinforcement Learning Tutor Better Supported Lower Performers in a Math Task [32.6507926764587]
  Reinforcement learning could be a key tool to reduce the development cost and improve the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring software. We show that deep reinforcement learning can be used to provide adaptive pedagogical support to students learning about the concept of volume.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-11T02:11:24Z)
• The Power of Nudging: Exploring Three Interventions for Metacognitive Skills Instruction across Intelligent Tutoring Systems [6.639504127104268]
  Students were trained on a logic tutor that supports a default forward-chaining and a backward-chaining strategy. We investigated three types of interventions on teaching the Default students how and when to use which strategy on the logic tutor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-18T16:27:51Z)
• Teacher-student curriculum learning for reinforcement learning [1.7259824817932292]
  Reinforcement learning (rl) is a popular paradigm for sequential decision making problems. The sample inefficiency of deep reinforcement learning methods is a significant obstacle when applying rl to real-world problems. We propose a teacher-student curriculum learning setting where we simultaneously train a teacher that selects tasks for the student while the student learns how to solve the selected task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T14:45:39Z)
• Teachable Reinforcement Learning via Advice Distillation [161.43457947665073]
  We propose a new supervision paradigm for interactive learning based on "teachable" decision-making systems that learn from structured advice provided by an external teacher. We show that agents that learn from advice can acquire new skills with significantly less human supervision than standard reinforcement learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-19T03:22:57Z)
• Rethinking Learning Dynamics in RL using Adversarial Networks [79.56118674435844]
  We present a learning mechanism for reinforcement learning of closely related skills parameterized via a skill embedding space. The main contribution of our work is to formulate an adversarial training regime for reinforcement learning with the help of entropy-regularized policy gradient formulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-27T19:51:09Z)
• Persistent Reinforcement Learning via Subgoal Curricula [114.83989499740193]
  Value-accelerated Persistent Reinforcement Learning (VaPRL) generates a curriculum of initial states. VaPRL reduces the interventions required by three orders of magnitude compared to episodic reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-27T16:39:45Z)
• Dual Policy Distillation [58.43610940026261]
  Policy distillation, which transfers a teacher policy to a student policy, has achieved great success in challenging tasks of deep reinforcement learning. In this work, we introduce dual policy distillation(DPD), a student-student framework in which two learners operate on the same environment to explore different perspectives of the environment. The key challenge in developing this dual learning framework is to identify the beneficial knowledge from the peer learner for contemporary learning-based reinforcement learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T06:49:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.