Related papers: The History of AI Rights Research

The History of AI Rights Research

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.04714v2
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 07:14:22 GMT
Title: The History of AI Rights Research
Authors: Jamie Harris
Abstract summary: Report documents the history of research on AI rights and other moral consideration of artificial entities. It highlights key intellectual influences on this literature as well as research and academic discussion addressing the topic more directly.
Score: 0.0
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: This report documents the history of research on AI rights and other moral consideration of artificial entities. It highlights key intellectual influences on this literature as well as research and academic discussion addressing the topic more directly. We find that researchers addressing AI rights have often seemed to be unaware of the work of colleagues whose interests overlap with their own. Academic interest in this topic has grown substantially in recent years; this reflects wider trends in academic research, but it seems that certain influential publications, the gradual, accumulating ubiquity of AI and robotic technology, and relevant news events may all have encouraged increased academic interest in this specific topic. We suggest four levers that, if pulled on in the future, might increase interest further: the adoption of publication strategies similar to those of the most successful previous contributors; increased engagement with adjacent academic fields and debates; the creation of specialized journals, conferences, and research institutions; and more exploration of legal rights for artificial entities.

Related papers

Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice [63.20307830884542]
Next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution. Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts. We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-06T22:18:31Z)
AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey [47.5235291525383]
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have sparked a rethinking of artificial general intelligence possibilities. The increasing human-like capabilities of AI are also attracting attention in social science research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-22T10:57:09Z)
The complementary contributions of academia and industry to AI research [0.0]
We characterize the impact and type of AI produced by industry and academia over the last 25 years. We find that articles published by industry teams tend to get greater attention, with a higher chance of being highly cited and citation-disruptive. We find that academic-industry collaborations struggle to replicate the novelty of academic teams and tend to look similar to industry teams.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-04T03:08:13Z)
Analyzing the Impact of Companies on AI Research Based on Publications [1.450405446885067]
We compare academic- and company-authored AI publications published in the last decade. We find that the citation count an individual publication receives is significantly higher when it is (co-authored) by a company.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-31T13:27:04Z)
Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021 [73.06361680847708]
In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI, but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI (many in computer science), but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. We conclude that the context of the current surge appears different, and that interdisciplinary AI application is likely to be sustained.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-15T14:08:07Z)
The ethical ambiguity of AI data enrichment: Measuring gaps in research ethics norms and practices [2.28438857884398]
This study explores how, and to what extent, comparable research ethics requirements and norms have developed for AI research and data enrichment. Leading AI venues have begun to establish protocols for human data collection, but these are are inconsistently followed by authors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T16:12:55Z)
Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Current & Future Trends [76.94037394832931]
In recent years, the CHI community has seen significant growth in research on Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence. All of this work is aimed at developing AI that benefits humanity while being grounded in human rights and ethics, and reducing the potential harms of AI. In this special interest group, we aim to bring together researchers from academia and industry interested in these topics to map current and future research trends.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-16T08:59:42Z)
Characterising Research Areas in the field of AI [68.8204255655161]
We identified the main conceptual themes by performing clustering analysis on the co-occurrence network of topics. The results highlight the growing academic interest in research themes like deep learning, machine learning, and internet of things.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-26T16:30:30Z)
Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
The Privatization of AI Research(-ers): Causes and Potential Consequences -- From university-industry interaction to public research brain-drain? [0.0]
The private sector is playing an increasingly important role in basic Artificial Intelligence (AI) R&D. This phenomenon is reflected in the perception of a brain drain of researchers from academia to industry. We find a growing net flow of researchers from academia to industry, particularly from elite institutions into technology companies such as Google, Microsoft and Facebook.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-02T18:02:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.