Learning to Infer Counterfactuals: Meta-Learning for Estimating Multiple Imbalanced Treatment Effects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.06748v1
• Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2022 23:22:12 GMT
• Title: Learning to Infer Counterfactuals: Meta-Learning for Estimating Multiple Imbalanced Treatment Effects
• Authors: Guanglin Zhou and Lina Yao and Xiwei Xu and Chen Wang and Liming Zhu
• Abstract summary: We consider data episodes among treatment groups in counterfactual inference as meta-learning tasks. We train a meta-learner from a set of source treatment groups with sufficient samples and update the model by gradient descent with limited samples in target treatment. We perform experiments on two real-world datasets to evaluate inference accuracy and generalization ability.
• Score: 41.06974193338288
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We regularly consider answering counterfactual questions in practice, such as "Would people with diabetes take a turn for the better had they choose another medication?". Observational studies are growing in significance in answering such questions due to their widespread accumulation and comparatively easier acquisition than Randomized Control Trials (RCTs). Recently, some works have introduced representation learning and domain adaptation into counterfactual inference. However, most current works focus on the setting of binary treatments. None of them considers that different treatments' sample sizes are imbalanced, especially data examples in some treatment groups are relatively limited due to inherent user preference. In this paper, we design a new algorithmic framework for counterfactual inference, which brings an idea from Meta-learning for Estimating Individual Treatment Effects (MetaITE) to fill the above research gaps, especially considering multiple imbalanced treatments. Specifically, we regard data episodes among treatment groups in counterfactual inference as meta-learning tasks. We train a meta-learner from a set of source treatment groups with sufficient samples and update the model by gradient descent with limited samples in target treatment. Moreover, we introduce two complementary losses. One is the supervised loss on multiple source treatments. The other loss which aligns latent distributions among various treatment groups is proposed to reduce the discrepancy. We perform experiments on two real-world datasets to evaluate inference accuracy and generalization ability. Experimental results demonstrate that the model MetaITE matches/outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

Related papers

• Causal Machine Learning for Moderation Effects [0.0]
  We propose a new parameter, the balanced group average treatment effect (BGATE) By taking the difference of two BGATEs, we can analyse heterogeneity more meaningfully than by comparing two GATEs. Adding additional identifying assumptions allows specific balanced differences in treatment effects between groups to be interpreted causally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T11:34:59Z)
• Adversarially Balanced Representation for Continuous Treatment Effect Estimation [6.469020202994118]
  In this paper, we consider the more practical and challenging scenario in which the treatment is a continuous variable. We propose the adversarial counterfactual regression network (ACFR) that adversarially minimizes the representation imbalance in terms of KL divergence. Our experimental evaluation on semi-synthetic datasets demonstrates the empirical superiority of ACFR over a range of state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-17T00:46:16Z)
• The Blessings of Multiple Treatments and Outcomes in Treatment Effect Estimation [53.81860494566915]
  Existing studies leveraged proxy variables or multiple treatments to adjust for confounding bias. In many real-world scenarios, there is greater interest in studying the effects on multiple outcomes. We show that parallel studies of multiple outcomes involved in this setting can assist each other in causal identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T14:33:48Z)
• Rethinking Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation: A Variance-Reduction Perspective [51.70661197256033]
  We propose ARCO, a semi-supervised contrastive learning framework with stratified group theory for medical image segmentation. We first propose building ARCO through the concept of variance-reduced estimation and show that certain variance-reduction techniques are particularly beneficial in pixel/voxel-level segmentation tasks. We experimentally validate our approaches on eight benchmarks, i.e., five 2D/3D medical and three semantic segmentation datasets, with different label settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T13:50:25Z)
• Comparison of meta-learners for estimating multi-valued treatment heterogeneous effects [2.294014185517203]
  Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATE) estimation is one of the main challenges in causal inference with observational data. Nonparametric estimators called meta-learners have been developed to estimate the CATE with the main advantage of not restraining the estimation to a specific supervised learning method. This paper looks into meta-learners for estimating the heterogeneous effects of multi-valued treatments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-29T16:46:21Z)
• Multi-Task Adversarial Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation in Basket Trials [12.266020657495618]
  We describe causal inference for application in a novel clinical design called basket trial. We propose a multi-task adversarial learning (MTAL) method to estimate potential outcomes across different tumor types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T02:41:26Z)
• To Impute or not to Impute? -- Missing Data in Treatment Effect Estimation [84.76186111434818]
  We identify a new missingness mechanism, which we term mixed confounded missingness (MCM), where some missingness determines treatment selection and other missingness is determined by treatment selection. We show that naively imputing all data leads to poor performing treatment effects models, as the act of imputation effectively removes information necessary to provide unbiased estimates. Our solution is selective imputation, where we use insights from MCM to inform precisely which variables should be imputed and which should not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-04T12:08:31Z)
• BITES: Balanced Individual Treatment Effect for Survival data [0.0]
  Estimating the effects of interventions on patient outcome is one of the key aspects of personalized medicine. Time-to-event data is rarely used for treatment optimization. We suggest an approach named BITES, which combines a treatment-specific semi-parametric Cox loss with a treatment-balanced deep neural network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-05T10:39:31Z)
• Learning Decomposed Representation for Counterfactual Inference [53.36586760485262]
  The fundamental problem in treatment effect estimation from observational data is confounder identification and balancing. Most of the previous methods realized confounder balancing by treating all observed pre-treatment variables as confounders, ignoring further identifying confounders and non-confounders. We propose a synergistic learning framework to 1) identify confounders by learning representations of both confounders and non-confounders, 2) balance confounder with sample re-weighting technique, and simultaneously 3) estimate the treatment effect in observational studies via counterfactual inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T09:50:42Z)
• Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
  We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication. We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance. We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.