Causal Machine Learning for Moderation Effects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.08290v2
• Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:30:31 GMT
• Title: Causal Machine Learning for Moderation Effects
• Authors: Nora Bearth, Michael Lechner,
• Abstract summary: We propose a new parameter, the balanced group average treatment effect (BGATE) By taking the difference of two BGATEs, we can analyse heterogeneity more meaningfully than by comparing two GATEs. Adding additional identifying assumptions allows specific balanced differences in treatment effects between groups to be interpreted causally.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: It is valuable for any decision maker to know the impact of decisions (treatments) on average and for subgroups. The causal machine learning literature has recently provided tools for estimating group average treatment effects (GATE) to understand treatment heterogeneity better. This paper addresses the challenge of interpreting such differences in treatment effects between groups while accounting for variations in other covariates. We propose a new parameter, the balanced group average treatment effect (BGATE), which measures a GATE with a specific distribution of a priori-determined covariates. By taking the difference of two BGATEs, we can analyse heterogeneity more meaningfully than by comparing two GATEs. The estimation strategy for this parameter is based on double/debiased machine learning for discrete treatments in an unconfoundedness setting, and the estimator is shown to be $\sqrt{N}$-consistent and asymptotically normal under standard conditions. Adding additional identifying assumptions allows specific balanced differences in treatment effects between groups to be interpreted causally, leading to the causal balanced group average treatment effect. We explore the finite sample properties in a small-scale simulation study and demonstrate the usefulness of these parameters in an empirical example.

Related papers

• A Bayesian Classification Trees Approach to Treatment Effect Variation with Noncompliance [0.5356944479760104]
  Estimating varying treatment effects in randomized trials with noncompliance is inherently challenging. Existing flexible machine learning methods are highly sensitive to the weak instruments problem. We present a Bayesian Causal Forest model for binary response variables in scenarios with noncompliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T18:33:55Z)
• CURLS: Causal Rule Learning for Subgroups with Significant Treatment Effect [22.012322558109574]
  In causal inference, estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) is critical for identifying how different subgroups respond to interventions. We propose CURLS, a novel rule learning method leveraging HTE, which can effectively describe subgroups with significant treatment effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T06:36:27Z)
• Proximal Causal Learning of Conditional Average Treatment Effects [0.0]
  We propose a tailored two-stage loss function for learning heterogeneous treatment effects. Our proposed estimator can be implemented by off-the-shelf loss-minimizing machine learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T02:56:36Z)
• Generalization bounds and algorithms for estimating conditional average treatment effect of dosage [13.867315751451494]
  We investigate the task of estimating the conditional average causal effect of treatment-dosage pairs from a combination of observational data and assumptions on the causal relationships in the underlying system. This has been a longstanding challenge for fields of study such as epidemiology or economics that require a treatment-dosage pair to make decisions. We show empirically new state-of-the-art performance results across several benchmark datasets for this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-29T15:26:59Z)
• Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment Effects [62.44901952244514]
  The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is the best point prediction of individual causal effects. In aggregate analyses, this is usually addressed by measuring distributional treatment effect (DTE) We provide a new robust and model-agnostic methodology for learning the conditional DTE (CDTE) for a wide class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T17:40:31Z)
• Treatment Effect Risk: Bounds and Inference [58.442274475425144]
  Since the average treatment effect measures the change in social welfare, even if positive, there is a risk of negative effect on, say, some 10% of the population. In this paper we consider how to nonetheless assess this important risk measure, formalized as the conditional value at risk (CVaR) of the ITE distribution. Some bounds can also be interpreted as summarizing a complex CATE function into a single metric and are of interest independently of being a bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T17:21:26Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• Variance Minimization in the Wasserstein Space for Invariant Causal Prediction [72.13445677280792]
  In this work, we show that the approach taken in ICP may be reformulated as a series of nonparametric tests that scales linearly in the number of predictors. Each of these tests relies on the minimization of a novel loss function that is derived from tools in optimal transport theory. We prove under mild assumptions that our method is able to recover the set of identifiable direct causes, and we demonstrate in our experiments that it is competitive with other benchmark causal discovery algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T22:30:47Z)
• Double machine learning for sample selection models [0.12891210250935145]
  This paper considers the evaluation of discretely distributed treatments when outcomes are only observed for a subpopulation due to sample selection or outcome attrition. We make use of (a) Neyman-orthogonal, doubly robust, and efficient score functions, which imply the robustness of treatment effect estimation to moderate regularization biases in the machine learning-based estimation of the outcome, treatment, or sample selection models and (b) sample splitting (or cross-fitting) to prevent overfitting bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-30T19:40:21Z)
• Robust Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Uncertainty Quantification [84.53697297858146]
  Subgroup analysis of treatment effects plays an important role in applications from medicine to public policy to recommender systems. Most of the current methods of subgroup analysis begin with a particular algorithm for estimating individualized treatment effects (ITE) This paper develops a new method for subgroup analysis, R2P, that addresses all these weaknesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T14:50:02Z)
• Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
  We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication. We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance. We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.