Kupczynski's Contextual Locally Causal Probabilistic Models are
constrained by Bell's theorem
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.09930v8
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 04:08:04 GMT
- Title: Kupczynski's Contextual Locally Causal Probabilistic Models are
constrained by Bell's theorem
- Authors: Richard D. Gill and Justo Pastor Lambare
- Abstract summary: Kupczynski has argued that Bell's theorem can be circumvented if one takes correct account of contextual setting-dependent parameters describing measuring instruments.
We show that this is not true. Even if one takes account of contextuality in the way he suggests, the Bell-CHSH inequality can still be derived.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In a sequence of papers, Marian Kupczynski has argued that Bell's theorem can
be circumvented if one takes correct account of contextual setting-dependent
parameters describing measuring instruments. We show that this is not true.
Despite first appearances, Kupczynksi's concept of a contextual locally causal
probabilistic model is mathematically a special case of a Bell local hidden
variables model. Thus, even if one takes account of contextuality in the way he
suggests, the Bell-CHSH inequality can still be derived. Violation thereof by
quantum mechanics cannot be easily explained away: quantum mechanics and local
realism (including Kupczynski's claimed enlargement of the concept) are not
compatible with one another. Further inspection shows that Kupczynski is
actually falling back on the detection loophole. Since 2015, numerous
loophole-free experiments have been performed, in which the Bell-CHSH
inequality is violated, so despite any other possible imperfections of such
experiments, Kupczynski's escape route for local realism is not available
Related papers
- Kolmogorovian Censorship, Predictive Incompleteness, and the locality loophole in Bell experiments [0.0]
Kolmogorovian Censorship stipulates that quantum probabilities can be identified with classical, Kolmogorovian probabilities.
In a loophole-free Bell test, the remote random choices of measurements have the purpose to prevent this matching.
We argue that predictive incompleteness is the correct quantum way to understand the violation of Bell's inequalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-06T06:20:54Z) - Some consequences of Sica's approach to Bell's inequalities [55.2480439325792]
Louis Sica derived Bell's inequalities from the hypothesis that the time series of outcomes observed in one station does not change if the setting in the other station is changed.
In this paper, Sica's approach is extended to series with non ideal efficiency and to the actual time structure of experimental data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T13:59:52Z) - Response: Kupczynski Contextual Locally Causal Probabilistic Models are
constrained by Bell theorem [0.0]
In our contextual model, statistical independence is violated, thus it is not constrained by Bell Theorem.
In several Bell Tests, two time series of distant clicks are converted into finite samples containing pairs of non zero outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T20:09:01Z) - A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality [55.6970314129444]
We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality.
Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T13:15:48Z) - Is the Moon there if nobody looks: A reply to Gill and Lambare [0.0]
In a recent preprint Gill and Lambare criticize our paper published in Frontiers in Physics.
They define a probabilistic coupling, in which BI-CHSH hold for all finite samples.
A joint probability distribution of these random variables does not exist and may not be used to derive inequalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-16T14:59:24Z) - Explicit construction of Local Hidden Variables for any quantum theory
up to any desired accuracy [0.0]
The machinery of quantum mechanics is fully capable of describing a single realistic world.
Bell's theorem is not applicable in the cases considered.
The potential importance of our construction in model building is discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-07T12:19:57Z) - Non-Boolean Hidden Variables model reproduces Quantum Mechanics'
predictions for Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
Theory aimed to violate Bell's inequalities must start by giving up Boolean logic.
"Hard" problem is to predict the time values when single particles are detected.
"Soft" problem is to explain the violation of Bell's inequalities within (non-Boolean) Local Realism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-20T21:46:35Z) - Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality.
This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment.
It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z) - Using Randomness to decide among Locality, Realism and Ergodicity [91.3755431537592]
An experiment is proposed to find out, or at least to get an indication about, which one is false.
The results of such experiment would be important not only to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-06T19:26:32Z) - Bell's theorem for trajectories [62.997667081978825]
A trajectory is not an outcome of a quantum measurement, in the sense that there is no observable associated with it.
We show how to overcome this problem by considering a special case of our generic inequality that can be experimentally tested point-by-point in time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-03T01:40:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.