Characterizing and quantifying the incompatibility of quantum instruments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.02621v2
• Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 05:55:47 GMT
• Title: Characterizing and quantifying the incompatibility of quantum instruments
• Authors: Arindam Mitra, M\'at\'e Farkas
• Abstract summary: We introduce -- similarly to the case of measurements and channels -- the incompatibility of quantum instruments and derive universal bounds on it. We prove that post-processing of quantum instruments is a free operation for parallel compatibility. We provide families of instruments for which our bounds are tight, and families of compatible indecomposable instruments.
• Score: 5.1398743023989555
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Incompatibility of quantum devices is one of the cornerstones of quantum theory, and the incompatibility of quantum measurements and channels has been linked to quantum advantage in certain information theoretic tasks. In this work, we focus on the less well-explored question of the incompatibility of quantum instruments, that is, devices that describe the measurement process in its entirety, accounting for both the classical measurement outcome and the quantum post-measurement state. In particular, we focus on the recently introduced notion of parallel compatibility of instruments, which has been argued to be a natural notion of instrument compatibility. We introduce -- similarly to the case of measurements and channels -- the incompatibility robustness of quantum instruments and derive universal bounds on it. We then prove that post-processing of quantum instruments is a free operation for parallel compatibility. Last, we provide families of instruments for which our bounds are tight, and families of compatible indecomposable instruments.

Related papers

• Entanglement measurement based on convex hull properties [0.0]
  We will propose a scheme for measuring quantum entanglement, which starts with treating the set of quantum separable states as a convex hull of quantum separable pure states. Although a large amount of data is required in the measurement process, this method is not only applicable to 2-qubit quantum states, but also a entanglement measurement method that can be applied to any dimension and any fragment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T08:03:35Z)
• Enhanced Entanglement in the Measurement-Altered Quantum Ising Chain [46.99825956909532]
  Local quantum measurements do not simply disentangle degrees of freedom, but may actually strengthen the entanglement in the system. This paper explores how a finite density of local measurement modifies a given state's entanglement structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T09:51:00Z)
• Witnessing Quantum Incompatibility Structures in High-Dimensional Multimeasurement Systems [10.275541065101345]
  Quantum incompatibility is the phenomenon that some quantum measurements cannot be performed simultaneously. We propose a modified quantum state discrimination protocol that decomposes complex compatibility structures into pairwise ones. We experimentally demonstrate our results and connect them with quantum steering, quantum simulability and quantum communications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T09:12:51Z)
• Measurement-induced entanglement and teleportation on a noisy quantum processor [105.44548669906976]
  We investigate measurement-induced quantum information phases on up to 70 superconducting qubits. We use a duality mapping, to avoid mid-circuit measurement and access different manifestations of the underlying phases. Our work demonstrates an approach to realize measurement-induced physics at scales that are at the limits of current NISQ processors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T18:41:53Z)
• Incompatibility of quantum instruments [0.0]
  Quantum instruments describe outcome probability as well as state change induced by measurement of a quantum system. We derive implications of instrument compatibility for the induced POVMs and channels. We prove equivalence between instrument compatibility and postprocessing of certain instruments, which we term complementary instruments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T17:54:51Z)
• Anticipative measurements in hybrid quantum-classical computation [68.8204255655161]
  We present an approach where the quantum computation is supplemented by a classical result. Taking advantage of its anticipation also leads to a new type of quantum measurements, which we call anticipative. In an anticipative quantum measurement the combination of the results from classical and quantum computations happens only in the end.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-12T15:47:44Z)
• Quantifying incompatibility of quantum measurements through non-commutativity [0.0]
  Incompatible measurements are an important distinction between quantum mechanics and classical theories. We explore a family of incompatibility measures based on non-commutativity. We show that they satisfy some natural information-processing requirements. We also consider the behavior of our measures under different types of compositions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-20T16:37:10Z)
• Characterizing quantum instruments: from non-demolition measurements to quantum error correction [48.43720700248091]
  In quantum information processing quantum operations are often processed alongside measurements which result in classical data. Non-unitary dynamical processes can take place on the system, for which common quantum channel descriptions fail to describe the time evolution. Quantum measurements are correctly treated by means of so-called quantum instruments capturing both classical outputs and post-measurement quantum states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T18:00:13Z)
• On the compatibility of quantum instruments [5.1398743023989555]
  We argue that the notion of traditional compatibility is incomplete, and prove that while parallel compatibility captures measurement and channel compatibility, traditional compatibility does not. We propose parallel compatibility as the conceptually complete definition of compatibility of quantum instruments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-03T06:04:49Z)
• Experimental violations of Leggett-Garg's inequalities on a quantum computer [77.34726150561087]
  We experimentally observe the violations of Leggett-Garg-Bell's inequalities on single and multi-qubit systems. Our analysis highlights the limits of nowadays quantum platforms, showing that the above-mentioned correlation functions deviate from theoretical prediction as the number of qubits and the depth of the circuit grow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:35:15Z)
• Efficient criteria of quantumness for a large system of qubits [58.720142291102135]
  We discuss the dimensionless combinations of basic parameters of large, partially quantum coherent systems. Based on analytical and numerical calculations, we suggest one such number for a system of qubits undergoing adiabatic evolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-30T23:50:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.