Thinking Hallucination for Video Captioning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.13853v1
• Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 06:15:42 GMT
• Title: Thinking Hallucination for Video Captioning
• Authors: Nasib Ullah, Partha Pratim Mohanta
• Abstract summary: In video captioning, there are two kinds of hallucination: object and action hallucination. We identify three main factors: (i) inadequate visual features extracted from pre-trained models, (ii) improper influences of source and target contexts during multi-modal fusion, and (iii) exposure bias in the training strategy. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on the MSR-Video to Text (MSR-VTT) and the Microsoft Research Video Description Corpus (MSVD) datasets.
• Score: 0.76146285961466
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the advent of rich visual representations and pre-trained language models, video captioning has seen continuous improvement over time. Despite the performance improvement, video captioning models are prone to hallucination. Hallucination refers to the generation of highly pathological descriptions that are detached from the source material. In video captioning, there are two kinds of hallucination: object and action hallucination. Instead of endeavoring to learn better representations of a video, in this work, we investigate the fundamental sources of the hallucination problem. We identify three main factors: (i) inadequate visual features extracted from pre-trained models, (ii) improper influences of source and target contexts during multi-modal fusion, and (iii) exposure bias in the training strategy. To alleviate these problems, we propose two robust solutions: (a) the introduction of auxiliary heads trained in multi-label settings on top of the extracted visual features and (b) the addition of context gates, which dynamically select the features during fusion. The standard evaluation metrics for video captioning measures similarity with ground truth captions and do not adequately capture object and action relevance. To this end, we propose a new metric, COAHA (caption object and action hallucination assessment), which assesses the degree of hallucination. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on the MSR-Video to Text (MSR-VTT) and the Microsoft Research Video Description Corpus (MSVD) datasets, especially by a massive margin in CIDEr score.

Related papers

• PerturboLLaVA: Reducing Multimodal Hallucinations with Perturbative Visual Training [56.172959986096316]
  This paper aims to address the challenge of hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) HalFscore is a novel metric built upon the language graph and is designed to evaluate both the accuracy and completeness of dense captions at a granular level. PerturboLLaVA significantly improves the fidelity of generated captions, outperforming existing approaches in handling multimodal hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T07:07:03Z)
• Towards a Systematic Evaluation of Hallucinations in Large-Vision Language Models [57.58426038241812]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in complex multimodal tasks. These models still suffer from hallucinations when required to implicitly recognize or infer diverse visual entities from images. We propose a novel visual question answering (VQA) benchmark that employs contextual reasoning prompts as hallucination attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-29T23:56:01Z)
• Cracking the Code of Hallucination in LVLMs with Vision-aware Head Divergence [69.86946427928511]
  We investigate the internal mechanisms driving hallucination in large vision-language models (LVLMs) We introduce Vision-aware Head Divergence (VHD), a metric that quantifies the sensitivity of attention head outputs to visual context. We propose Vision-aware Head Reinforcement (VHR), a training-free approach to mitigate hallucination by enhancing the role of vision-aware attention heads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T15:29:30Z)
• VaLiD: Mitigating the Hallucination of Large Vision Language Models by Visual Layer Fusion Contrastive Decoding [38.23310445372371]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in multimodal task reasoning. They often generate responses that appear plausible yet do not accurately reflect the visual content, a phenomenon known as hallucination. Recent approaches have introduced training-free methods to mitigate hallucinations by adjusting the decoding strategy during the inference stage. We propose a novel hallucination-mitigation method from the visual encoding perspective: textbfVisutextbfal textbfLayer Fustextbfion Contrastive textbfD
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-24T13:42:02Z)
• From Pixels to Tokens: Revisiting Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models [15.401221354325672]
  Hallucinations in large vision models (LVLMs) are a significant challenge, i.e., generating objects that are not presented in the visual input. Recent studies often attribute hallucinations to a lack of understanding of visual input, yet ignore a more fundamental issue: the model's inability to extract or decouple visual features. In this paper, we revisit the hallucinations in LVLMs from an architectural perspective, investigating whether the primary cause lies in the visual encoder (feature extraction) or the modal alignment module (feature decoupling)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T11:46:32Z)
• VideoHallucer: Evaluating Intrinsic and Extrinsic Hallucinations in Large Video-Language Models [59.05674402770661]
  This work introduces VideoHallucer, the first comprehensive benchmark for hallucination detection in large video-language models (LVLMs) VideoHallucer categorizes hallucinations into two main types: intrinsic and extrinsic, offering further subcategories for detailed analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T06:21:59Z)
• Alleviating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Hallucination-Induced Optimization [123.54980913741828]
  Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated exceptional abilities in understanding multimodal data. They invariably suffer from hallucinations, leading to a disconnect between the generated text and the corresponding images. Almost all current visual contrastive decoding methods attempt to mitigate these hallucinations by introducing visual uncertainty information. However, they struggle to precisely induce the hallucinatory tokens, which severely limits their effectiveness in mitigating hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T08:46:31Z)
• Detecting and Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Fine-Grained AI Feedback [48.065569871444275]
  We propose detecting and mitigating hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) via fine-grained AI feedback. We generate a small-size hallucination annotation dataset by proprietary models. Then, we propose a detect-then-rewrite pipeline to automatically construct preference dataset for training hallucination mitigating model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T14:46:10Z)
• Hallucination Augmented Contrastive Learning for Multimodal Large Language Model [53.65682783591723]
  Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have been shown to efficiently integrate natural language with visual information to handle multi-modal tasks. However, MLLMs still face a fundamental limitation of hallucinations, where they tend to generate erroneous or fabricated information. In this paper, we address hallucinations in MLLMs from a novel perspective of representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T04:05:15Z)
• Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decoding [125.05295513481035]
  We introduce Visual Contrastive Decoding (VCD), a simple and training-free method that contrasts output distributions derived from original and distorted visual inputs. The proposed VCD effectively reduces the over-reliance on statistical bias and unimodal priors, two essential causes of object hallucinations. Our experiments show that VCD, without either additional training or the usage of external tools, significantly mitigates the object hallucination issue across different LVLM families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T16:26:35Z)
• Mitigating Hallucination in Visual Language Models with Visual Supervision [33.05550629039951]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) suffer from hallucination a lot. Key problem lies in its weak ability to comprehend detailed content in a multi-modal context. In this paper, we bring more detailed vision annotations and more discriminative vision models to facilitate the training of LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T09:30:02Z)
• Plausible May Not Be Faithful: Probing Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Pre-training [66.0036211069513]
  Large-scale vision-language pre-trained models are prone to hallucinate non-existent visual objects when generating text. We show that models achieving better scores on standard metrics could hallucinate objects more frequently. Surprisingly, we find that patch-based features perform the best and smaller patch resolution yields a non-trivial reduction in object hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T10:27:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.