"A Special Operation": A Quantitative Approach to Dissecting and Comparing Different Media Ecosystems' Coverage of the Russo-Ukrainian War

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03016v4
• Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 15:42:35 GMT
• Title: "A Special Operation": A Quantitative Approach to Dissecting and Comparing Different Media Ecosystems' Coverage of the Russo-Ukrainian War
• Authors: Hans W. A. Hanley, Deepak Kumar, Zakir Durumeric
• Abstract summary: The coverage of the Russian invasion of Ukraine has varied widely between Western, Russian, and Chinese media ecosystems. We find that while the Western press outlets have focused on the military and humanitarian aspects of the war, Russian media have focused on the purported justifications for the "special military operation" We measure the degree to which Russian media has influenced Chinese coverage across Chinese outlets' news articles, Weibo accounts, and Twitter accounts.
• Score: 5.567674129101803
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The coverage of the Russian invasion of Ukraine has varied widely between Western, Russian, and Chinese media ecosystems with propaganda, disinformation, and narrative spins present in all three. By utilizing the normalized pointwise mutual information metric, differential sentiment analysis, word2vec models, and partially labeled Dirichlet allocation, we present a quantitative analysis of the differences in coverage amongst these three news ecosystems. We find that while the Western press outlets have focused on the military and humanitarian aspects of the war, Russian media have focused on the purported justifications for the "special military operation" such as the presence in Ukraine of "bio-weapons" and "neo-nazis", and Chinese news media have concentrated on the conflict's diplomatic and economic consequences. Detecting the presence of several Russian disinformation narratives in the articles of several Chinese outlets, we finally measure the degree to which Russian media has influenced Chinese coverage across Chinese outlets' news articles, Weibo accounts, and Twitter accounts. Our analysis indicates that since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Chinese state media outlets have increasingly cited Russian outlets as news sources and spread Russian disinformation narratives.

Related papers

• News and Misinformation Consumption in Europe: A Longitudinal Cross-Country Perspective [49.1574468325115]
  This study investigated information consumption in four European countries. It analyzed three years of Twitter activity from news outlet accounts in France, Germany, Italy, and the UK. Results indicate that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, although unreliable content is still present across all countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T16:22:10Z)
• Opponents and proponents of the war in Ukraine in Russian social media: who are they? [0.0]
  I compare the political identities, values, and interests of social media users in Russia who hold a strong position for or against the war in Ukraine. I found that proponents of the war tend to have a weaker political identity. The values of the proponents more frequently align with those promoted by the Russian government.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T12:21:49Z)
• Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
  We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
• Partial Mobilization: Tracking Multilingual Information Flows Amongst Russian Media Outlets and Telegram [5.161088104035108]
  We study how 16 Russian media outlets interacted with and utilized 732 Telegram channels throughout 2022. We show that news outlets not only propagate existing narratives through Telegram but that they source material from the messaging platform. For example, across the websites in our study, between 2.3% (ura.news) and 26.7% (ukraina.ru) of articles discussed content that originated/resulted from activity on Telegram.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T22:27:40Z)
• Automated multilingual detection of Pro-Kremlin propaganda in newspapers and Telegram posts [5.886782001771578]
  The full-scale conflict between the Russian Federation and Ukraine generated an unprecedented amount of news articles and social media data. This study analyses how the media affected and mirrored public opinion during the first month of the war using news articles and Telegram news channels in Ukrainian, Russian, Romanian and English. We propose and compare two methods of multilingual automated pro-Kremlin propaganda identification, based on Transformers and linguistic features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T14:25:37Z)
• Computational Assessment of Hyperpartisanship in News Titles [55.92100606666497]
  We first adopt a human-guided machine learning framework to develop a new dataset for hyperpartisan news title detection. Overall the Right media tends to use proportionally more hyperpartisan titles. We identify three major topics including foreign issues, political systems, and societal issues that are suggestive of hyperpartisanship in news titles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T05:56:58Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• Happenstance: Utilizing Semantic Search to Track Russian State Media Narratives about the Russo-Ukrainian War On Reddit [5.567674129101803]
  We study Russian state media narratives touted by the Russian government to English-speaking audiences. We first perform sentence-level topic analysis using the large-language model MPNet on articles published by ten different pro-Russian propaganda websites. Using MPNet and a semantic search algorithm, we map these subreddits' comments to the set of topics extracted from our set of Russian websites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T16:54:53Z)
• A Few Observations About State-Centric Online Propaganda [0.7106986689736826]
  This paper presents a few observations about pro-Kremlin propaganda between 2015 and early 2021 with a dataset from the East Stratcom Task Force (ESTF) Instead of focusing on misinformation and disinformation, the observations are motivated by classical propaganda research and the ongoing transformation of media systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T14:22:52Z)
• Cross-Domain Learning for Classifying Propaganda in Online Contents [67.10699378370752]
  We present an approach to leverage cross-domain learning, based on labeled documents and sentences from news and tweets, as well as political speeches with a clear difference in their degrees of being propagandistic. Our experiments demonstrate the usefulness of this approach, and identify difficulties and limitations in various configurations of sources and targets for the transfer step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:19:13Z)
• Russian trolls speaking Russian: Regional Twitter operations and MH17 [68.8204255655161]
  In 2018, Twitter released data on accounts identified as Russian trolls. We analyze the Russian-language operations of these trolls. We find that trolls' information campaign on the MH17 crash was the largest in terms of tweet count.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T19:48:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.