Certified machine learning: Rigorous a posteriori error bounds for PDE defined PINNs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03426v1
• Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:49:18 GMT
• Title: Certified machine learning: Rigorous a posteriori error bounds for PDE defined PINNs
• Authors: Birgit Hillebrecht, Benjamin Unger
• Abstract summary: We present a rigorous upper bound on the prediction error of physics-informed neural networks. We apply this to four problems: the transport equation, the heat equation, the Navier-Stokes equation and the Klein-Gordon equation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Prediction error quantification in machine learning has been left out of most methodological investigations of neural networks, for both purely data-driven and physics-informed approaches. Beyond statistical investigations and generic results on the approximation capabilities of neural networks, we present a rigorous upper bound on the prediction error of physics-informed neural networks. This bound can be calculated without the knowledge of the true solution and only with a priori available information about the characteristics of the underlying dynamical system governed by a partial differential equation. We apply this a posteriori error bound exemplarily to four problems: the transport equation, the heat equation, the Navier-Stokes equation and the Klein-Gordon equation.

Related papers

• Exact and approximate error bounds for physics-informed neural networks [1.236974227340167]
  We report important progress in calculating error bounds of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) solutions of nonlinear first-order ODEs. We give a general expression that describes the error of the solution that the PINN-based method provides for a nonlinear first-order ODE. We propose a technique to calculate an approximate bound for the general case and an exact bound for a particular case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T05:15:28Z)
• Spectral-Bias and Kernel-Task Alignment in Physically Informed Neural Networks [4.604003661048267]
  Physically informed neural networks (PINNs) are a promising emerging method for solving differential equations. We propose a comprehensive theoretical framework that sheds light on this important problem. We derive an integro-differential equation that governs PINN prediction in the large data-set limit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T18:00:02Z)
• Evaluating Error Bound for Physics-Informed Neural Networks on Linear Dynamical Systems [1.2891210250935146]
  This paper shows that one can mathematically derive explicit error bounds for physics-informed neural networks trained on a class of linear systems of differential equations. Our work shows a link between network residuals, which is known and used as loss function, and the absolute error of solution, which is generally unknown.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-03T20:23:43Z)
• Certified machine learning: A posteriori error estimation for physics-informed neural networks [0.0]
  PINNs are known to be robust for smaller training sets, derive better generalization problems, and are faster to train. We show that using PINNs in comparison with purely data-driven neural networks is not only favorable for training performance but allows us to extract significant information on the quality of the approximated solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-31T14:23:04Z)
• Error estimates for physics informed neural networks approximating the Navier-Stokes equations [6.445605125467574]
  We show that the underlying PDE residual can be made arbitrarily small for tanh neural networks with two hidden layers. The total error can be estimated in terms of the training error, network size and number of quadrature points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T14:26:17Z)
• Learning Physics-Informed Neural Networks without Stacked Back-propagation [82.26566759276105]
  We develop a novel approach that can significantly accelerate the training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks. In particular, we parameterize the PDE solution by the Gaussian smoothed model and show that, derived from Stein's Identity, the second-order derivatives can be efficiently calculated without back-propagation. Experimental results show that our proposed method can achieve competitive error compared to standard PINN training but is two orders of magnitude faster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T18:07:54Z)
• Training Feedback Spiking Neural Networks by Implicit Differentiation on the Equilibrium State [66.2457134675891]
  Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are brain-inspired models that enable energy-efficient implementation on neuromorphic hardware. Most existing methods imitate the backpropagation framework and feedforward architectures for artificial neural networks. We propose a novel training method that does not rely on the exact reverse of the forward computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T07:46:54Z)
• Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks [55.83255669840384]
  Recent work in scientific machine learning has developed so-called physics-informed neural network (PINN) models. We demonstrate that, while existing PINN methodologies can learn good models for relatively trivial problems, they can easily fail to learn relevant physical phenomena even for simple PDEs. We show that these possible failure modes are not due to the lack of expressivity in the NN architecture, but that the PINN's setup makes the loss landscape very hard to optimize.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-02T16:06:45Z)
• Conditional physics informed neural networks [85.48030573849712]
  We introduce conditional PINNs (physics informed neural networks) for estimating the solution of classes of eigenvalue problems. We show that a single deep neural network can learn the solution of partial differential equations for an entire class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-06T18:29:14Z)
• Relaxing the Constraints on Predictive Coding Models [62.997667081978825]
  Predictive coding is an influential theory of cortical function which posits that the principal computation the brain performs is the minimization of prediction errors. Standard implementations of the algorithm still involve potentially neurally implausible features such as identical forward and backward weights, backward nonlinear derivatives, and 1-1 error unit connectivity. In this paper, we show that these features are not integral to the algorithm and can be removed either directly or through learning additional sets of parameters with Hebbian update rules without noticeable harm to learning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-02T15:21:37Z)
• Multipole Graph Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations [57.90284928158383]
  One of the main challenges in using deep learning-based methods for simulating physical systems is formulating physics-based data. We propose a novel multi-level graph neural network framework that captures interaction at all ranges with only linear complexity. Experiments confirm our multi-graph network learns discretization-invariant solution operators to PDEs and can be evaluated in linear time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T21:56:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.