Nobody Wants to Work Anymore: An Analysis of r/antiwork and the Interplay between Social and Mainstream Media during the Great Resignation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07796v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:27:14 GMT
• Title: Nobody Wants to Work Anymore: An Analysis of r/antiwork and the Interplay between Social and Mainstream Media during the Great Resignation
• Authors: Alan Medlar, Yang Liu, Dorota Glowacka
• Abstract summary: r/antiwork is a Reddit community that focuses on the discussion of worker exploitation, labour rights and related left-wing political ideas. In late 2021, r/antiwork became the fastest growing community on Reddit, coinciding with what the mainstream media began referring to as the Great Resignation. We investigate how the r/antiwork community was affected by the exponential increase in subscribers and the media coverage that chronicled its rise.
• Score: 9.299167002524653
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: r/antiwork is a Reddit community that focuses on the discussion of worker exploitation, labour rights and related left-wing political ideas (e.g. universal basic income). In late 2021, r/antiwork became the fastest growing community on Reddit, coinciding with what the mainstream media began referring to as the Great Resignation. This same media coverage was attributed with popularising the subreddit and, therefore, accelerating its growth. In this article, we explore how the r/antiwork community was affected by the exponential increase in subscribers and the media coverage that chronicled its rise. We investigate how subreddit activity changed over time, the behaviour of heavy and light users, and how the topical nature of the discourse evolved with the influx of new subscribers. We report that, despite the continuing rise of subscribers well into 2022, activity on the subreddit collapsed after January 25th 2022, when a moderator's Fox news interview was widely criticised. While many users never commented again, longer running trends of users' posting and commenting behaviour did not change. Finally, while many users expressed their discontent at the changing nature of the subreddit as it became more popular, we found no evidence of major shifts in the topical content of discussion over the period studied, with the exception of the introduction of topics related to seasonal events (e.g. holidays, such as Thanksgiving) and ongoing developments in the news (e.g. working from home and the curtailing of reproductive rights in the United States).

Related papers

• Explainability and Hate Speech: Structured Explanations Make Social Media Moderators Faster [72.84926097773578]
  We investigate the effect of explanations on the speed of real-world moderators. Our experiments show that while generic explanations do not affect their speed and are often ignored, structured explanations lower moderators' decision making time by 7.4%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T14:23:10Z)
• Impact of Stricter Content Moderation on Parler's Users' Discourse [1.7863534204867277]
  We studied the moderation changes performed by Parler and their effect on the toxicity of its content. Our quasi-experimental time series analysis indicates that after the change in Parler's moderation, the severe forms of toxicity immediately decreased and sustained. We found an increase in the factuality of the news sites being shared, as well as a decrease in the number of conspiracy or pseudoscience sources being shared.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T04:09:39Z)
• Analyzing Norm Violations in Live-Stream Chat [49.120561596550395]
  We study the first NLP study dedicated to detecting norm violations in conversations on live-streaming platforms. We define norm violation categories in live-stream chats and annotate 4,583 moderated comments from Twitch. Our results show that appropriate contextual information can boost moderation performance by 35%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T05:58:27Z)
• Online conspiracy communities are more resilient to deplatforming [2.9767849911461504]
  We compare the shift in behavior of users affected by the ban of two large communities on Reddit, GreatAwakening and FatPeopleHate. We estimate how many users migrate, finding that users in the conspiracy community are much more likely to leave Reddit altogether and join Voat. Few migrating zealots drive the growth of the new GreatAwakening community on Voat, while this effect is absent for FatPeopleHate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T18:08:51Z)
• Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
  We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z)
• On the Relation Between Opinion Change and Information Consumption on Reddit [22.387666772159974]
  We study the relationship between one user's opinion change episode and subsequent behavioral change on an online social media, Reddit. We find that people who report an opinion change are significantly more likely to change their future participation in a specific subset of online communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-25T13:34:16Z)
• Hate speech, Censorship, and Freedom of Speech: The Changing Policies of Reddit [0.0]
  This paper examines the shift in focus on content policies and user attitudes on the social media platform Reddit. We do this by focusing on comments from general Reddit users from five posts made by admins (moderators) on updates to Reddit Content Policy. All five concern the nature of what kind of content is allowed to be posted on Reddit, and which measures will be taken against content that violates these policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-18T00:46:58Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Do Platform Migrations Compromise Content Moderation? Evidence from r/The_Donald and r/Incels [20.41491269475746]
  We report the results of a large-scale observational study of how problematic online communities progress following community-level moderation measures. Our results suggest that, in both cases, moderation measures significantly decreased posting activity on the new platform. In spite of that, users in one of the studied communities showed increases in signals associated with toxicity and radicalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T16:03:06Z)
• Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterspeech in Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis [51.39895377836919]
  COVID-19 has sparked racism and hate on social media targeted towards Asian communities. We study the evolution and spread of anti-Asian hate speech through the lens of Twitter. We create COVID-HATE, the largest dataset of anti-Asian hate and counterspeech spanning 14 months.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-25T21:58:09Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.