Probabilities of Causation: Role of Observational Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.08874v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 09:10:11 GMT
• Title: Probabilities of Causation: Role of Observational Data
• Authors: Ang Li, Judea Pearl
• Abstract summary: We discuss the conditions that observational data are worth considering to improve the quality of the bounds. We also apply the proposed theorems to the unit selection problem defined by Li and Pearl.
• Score: 20.750773939911685
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Probabilities of causation play a crucial role in modern decision-making. Pearl defined three binary probabilities of causation, the probability of necessity and sufficiency (PNS), the probability of sufficiency (PS), and the probability of necessity (PN). These probabilities were then bounded by Tian and Pearl using a combination of experimental and observational data. However, observational data are not always available in practice; in such a case, Tian and Pearl's Theorem provided valid but less effective bounds using pure experimental data. In this paper, we discuss the conditions that observational data are worth considering to improve the quality of the bounds. More specifically, we defined the expected improvement of the bounds by assuming the observational distributions are uniformly distributed on their feasible interval. We further applied the proposed theorems to the unit selection problem defined by Li and Pearl.

Related papers

• Intervention and Conditioning in Causal Bayesian Networks [23.225006087292765]
  We show that by making simple yet often realistic independence assumptions, it is possible to estimate the probability of an interventional formula. In many cases of interest, when the assumptions are appropriate, these probability estimates can be evaluated using observational data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T15:55:38Z)
• Approximating Counterfactual Bounds while Fusing Observational, Biased and Randomised Data Sources [64.96984404868411]
  We address the problem of integrating data from multiple, possibly biased, observational and interventional studies. We show that the likelihood of the available data has no local maxima. We then show how the same approach can address the general case of multiple datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T11:28:24Z)
• Causal inference for the expected number of recurrent events in the presence of a terminal event [0.0]
  We study causal inference and efficient estimation for the expected number of recurrent events in the presence of a terminal event. No absolute continuity assumption is made on the underlying probability distributions of failure, censoring, or the observed data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T21:31:25Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Probabilities of Causation: Adequate Size of Experimental and Observational Samples [17.565045120151865]
  Tian and Pearl derived sharp bounds for the probability of necessity and sufficiency (PNS), the probability of sufficiency (PS), and the probability of necessity (PN) using experimental and observational data. The assumption is that one is in possession of a large enough sample to permit an accurate estimation of the experimental and observational distributions. We present a method for determining the sample size needed for such estimation, when a given confidence interval (CI) is specified.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-10T21:59:49Z)
• Data-Driven Influence Functions for Optimization-Based Causal Inference [105.5385525290466]
  We study a constructive algorithm that approximates Gateaux derivatives for statistical functionals by finite differencing. We study the case where probability distributions are not known a priori but need to be estimated from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-29T16:16:22Z)
• Probabilities of Causation with Nonbinary Treatment and Effect [20.750773939911685]
  Tian and Pearl derived sharp bounds for the probability of necessity and sufficiency. We provide theoretical bounds for all types of probabilities of causation to multivalued treatments and effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-19T23:54:47Z)
• Bounding Counterfactuals under Selection Bias [60.55840896782637]
  We propose a first algorithm to address both identifiable and unidentifiable queries. We prove that, in spite of the missingness induced by the selection bias, the likelihood of the available data is unimodal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-26T10:33:10Z)
• Nested Counterfactual Identification from Arbitrary Surrogate Experiments [95.48089725859298]
  We study the identification of nested counterfactuals from an arbitrary combination of observations and experiments. Specifically, we prove the counterfactual unnesting theorem (CUT), which allows one to map arbitrary nested counterfactuals to unnested ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T12:51:04Z)
• Causes of Effects: Learning individual responses from population data [23.593582720307207]
  We study the problem of individualization and its applications in medicine. For example, the probability of benefiting from a treatment concerns an individual having a favorable outcome if treated and an unfavorable outcome if untreated. We analyze and expand on existing research by applying bounds to the probability of necessity and sufficiency (PNS) along with graphical criteria and practical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T12:38:11Z)
• Latent Causal Invariant Model [128.7508609492542]
  Current supervised learning can learn spurious correlation during the data-fitting process. We propose a Latent Causal Invariance Model (LaCIM) which pursues causal prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.