Artificial Intelligence and Innovation to Reduce the Impact of Extreme
Weather Events on Sustainable Production
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.08962v1
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 06:52:39 GMT
- Title: Artificial Intelligence and Innovation to Reduce the Impact of Extreme
Weather Events on Sustainable Production
- Authors: Derrick Effah, Chunguang Bai, and Matthew Quayson
- Abstract summary: unpredictability of extreme weather endangers sustainable production and life on land.
Modern technologies such as Artificial Intelligent (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), blockchain, 3D printing, and virtual and augmented reality (VR and AR) are promising to reduce the risk and impact of extreme weather.
However, research directions on how these technologies could help reduce the impact of extreme weather are unclear.
- Score: 1.290382979353427
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Frequent occurrences of extreme weather events substantially impact the lives
of the less privileged in our societies, particularly in agriculture-inclined
economies. The unpredictability of extreme fires, floods, drought, cyclones,
and others endangers sustainable production and life on land (SDG goal 15),
which translates into food insecurity and poorer populations. Fortunately,
modern technologies such as Artificial Intelligent (AI), the Internet of Things
(IoT), blockchain, 3D printing, and virtual and augmented reality (VR and AR)
are promising to reduce the risk and impact of extreme weather in our
societies. However, research directions on how these technologies could help
reduce the impact of extreme weather are unclear. This makes it challenging to
emploring digital technologies within the spheres of extreme weather. In this
paper, we employed the Delphi Best Worst method and Machine learning approaches
to identify and assess the push factors of technology. The BWM evaluation
revealed that predictive nature was AI's most important criterion and role,
while the mass-market potential was the less important criterion. Based on this
outcome, we tested the predictive ability of machine elarning on a publilcly
available dataset to affrm the predictive rols of AI. We presented the
managerial and methodological implications of the study, which are crucial for
research and practice. The methodology utilized in this study could aid
decision-makers in devising strategies and interventions to safeguard
sustainable production. This will also facilitate allocating scarce resources
and investment in improving AI techniques to reduce the adverse impacts of
extreme events. Correspondingly, we put forward the limitations of this, which
necessitate future research.
Related papers
- Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences.
First, it is not sustainable, as its compute demands increase faster than model performance, leading to unreasonable economic requirements and a disproportionate environmental footprint.
Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z) - Misrepresented Technological Solutions in Imagined Futures: The Origins and Dangers of AI Hype in the Research Community [0.060998359915727114]
We look at the origins and risks of AI hype to the research community and society more broadly.
We propose a set of measures that researchers, regulators, and the public can take to mitigate these risks and reduce the prevalence of unfounded claims about the technology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-08T20:47:17Z) - Mapping the individual, social, and biospheric impacts of Foundation Models [0.39843531413098965]
This paper offers a critical framework to account for the social, political, and environmental dimensions of foundation models and generative AI.
We identify 14 categories of risks and harms and map them according to their individual, social, and biospheric impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-24T10:05:40Z) - Control Risk for Potential Misuse of Artificial Intelligence in Science [85.91232985405554]
We aim to raise awareness of the dangers of AI misuse in science.
We highlight real-world examples of misuse in chemical science.
We propose a system called SciGuard to control misuse risks for AI models in science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-11T18:50:57Z) - Artificial Intelligence in Sustainable Vertical Farming [0.0]
The paper provides a comprehensive exploration of the role of AI in sustainable vertical farming.
The review synthesizes the current state of AI applications, encompassing machine learning, computer vision, the Internet of Things (IoT), and robotics.
The implications extend beyond efficiency gains, considering economic viability, reduced environmental impact, and increased food security.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-17T22:15:41Z) - On the Opportunities of Green Computing: A Survey [80.21955522431168]
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has achieved significant advancements in technology and research with the development over several decades.
The needs for high computing power brings higher carbon emission and undermines research fairness.
To tackle the challenges of computing resources and environmental impact of AI, Green Computing has become a hot research topic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-01T11:16:41Z) - Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems.
There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them.
Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z) - Predictable Artificial Intelligence [77.1127726638209]
This paper introduces the ideas and challenges of Predictable AI.
It explores the ways in which we can anticipate key validity indicators of present and future AI ecosystems.
We argue that achieving predictability is crucial for fostering trust, liability, control, alignment and safety of AI ecosystems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T21:36:21Z) - Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time.
We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups.
If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z) - A Survey on AI Sustainability: Emerging Trends on Learning Algorithms
and Research Challenges [35.317637957059944]
We review major trends in machine learning approaches that can address the sustainability problem of AI.
We will highlight the major limitations of existing studies and propose potential research challenges and directions for the development of next generation of sustainable AI techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-08T09:38:35Z) - Remote sensing, AI and innovative prediction methods for adapting cities
to the impacts of the climate change [0.0]
I propose an AI-based framework which might be useful for extracting indicators from remote sensing images.
I underline that this is an open field and an ongoing research for many scientists, therefore I offer an in depth discussion on the challenges and limitations of AI-based methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-06T15:55:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.