From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16548v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 22:45:06 GMT
• Title: From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate
• Authors: Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Emma Strubell, Kate Crawford,
• Abstract summary: Much of this debate has concentrated on direct impact without addressing the significant indirect effects. This paper examines how the problem of Jevons' Paradox applies to AI, whereby efficiency gains may paradoxically spur increased consumption. We argue that understanding these second-order impacts requires an interdisciplinary approach, combining lifecycle assessments with socio-economic analyses.
• Score: 69.05573887799203
• License:
• Abstract: As the climate crisis deepens, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a contested force: some champion its potential to advance renewable energy, materials discovery, and large-scale emissions monitoring, while others underscore its growing carbon footprint, water consumption, and material resource demands. Much of this debate has concentrated on direct impact -- energy and water usage in data centers, e-waste from frequent hardware upgrades -- without addressing the significant indirect effects. This paper examines how the problem of Jevons' Paradox applies to AI, whereby efficiency gains may paradoxically spur increased consumption. We argue that understanding these second-order impacts requires an interdisciplinary approach, combining lifecycle assessments with socio-economic analyses. Rebound effects undermine the assumption that improved technical efficiency alone will ensure net reductions in environmental harm. Instead, the trajectory of AI's impact also hinges on business incentives and market logics, governance and policymaking, and broader social and cultural norms. We contend that a narrow focus on direct emissions misrepresents AI's true climate footprint, limiting the scope for meaningful interventions. We conclude with recommendations that address rebound effects and challenge the market-driven imperatives fueling uncontrolled AI growth. By broadening the analysis to include both direct and indirect consequences, we aim to inform a more comprehensive, evidence-based dialogue on AI's role in the climate crisis.

Related papers

• Raising the Stakes: Performance Pressure Improves AI-Assisted Decision Making [57.53469908423318]
  We show the effects of performance pressure on AI advice reliance when laypeople complete a common AI-assisted task. We find that when the stakes are high, people use AI advice more appropriately than when stakes are lower, regardless of the presence of an AI explanation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:39:52Z)
• AI, Climate, and Regulation: From Data Centers to the AI Act [2.874893537471256]
  We aim to provide guidance on the climate-related regulation for data centers and AI specifically. We propose a specific interpretation of the AI Act to bring reporting on the previously unadressed energy consumption from AI inferences back into the scope. We argue for an interpretation of the AI Act that includes environmental concerns in the mandatory risk assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T08:43:53Z)
• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences. First, it is not sustainable, as its compute demands increase faster than model performance, leading to unreasonable economic requirements and a disproportionate environmental footprint. Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• AI, Climate, and Transparency: Operationalizing and Improving the AI Act [2.874893537471256]
  This paper critically examines the AI Act's provisions on climate-related transparency. We identify key shortcomings, including the exclusion of energy consumption during AI inference. We propose a novel interpretation to bring inference-related energy use back within the Act's scope.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T07:57:39Z)
• On the Opportunities of Green Computing: A Survey [80.21955522431168]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) has achieved significant advancements in technology and research with the development over several decades. The needs for high computing power brings higher carbon emission and undermines research fairness. To tackle the challenges of computing resources and environmental impact of AI, Green Computing has become a hot research topic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T11:16:41Z)
• Predictable Artificial Intelligence [77.1127726638209]
  This paper introduces the ideas and challenges of Predictable AI. It explores the ways in which we can anticipate key validity indicators of present and future AI ecosystems. We argue that achieving predictability is crucial for fostering trust, liability, control, alignment and safety of AI ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T21:36:21Z)
• AI For Global Climate Cooperation 2023 Competition Proceedings [77.07135605362795]
  No global authority can ensure compliance with international climate agreements. RICE-N supports modeling regional decision-making using AI agents. The IAM then models the climate-economic impact of those decisions into the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T20:05:42Z)
• Towards Sustainable Artificial Intelligence: An Overview of Environmental Protection Uses and Issues [0.0]
  This paper describes the paradox of an energy-consuming technology serving the ecological challenges of tomorrow. It draws on numerous examples from AI for Green players to present use cases and concrete examples. The environmental dimension is part of the broader ethical problem of AI, and addressing it is crucial for ensuring the sustainability of AI in the long term.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-22T14:31:48Z)
• Artificial Intelligence and Innovation to Reduce the Impact of Extreme Weather Events on Sustainable Production [1.290382979353427]
  unpredictability of extreme weather endangers sustainable production and life on land. Modern technologies such as Artificial Intelligent (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), blockchain, 3D printing, and virtual and augmented reality (VR and AR) are promising to reduce the risk and impact of extreme weather. However, research directions on how these technologies could help reduce the impact of extreme weather are unclear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T06:52:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.