Explanations Based on Item Response Theory (eXirt): A Model-Specific Method to Explain Tree-Ensemble Model in Trust Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.09933v3
• Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:08:04 GMT
• Title: Explanations Based on Item Response Theory (eXirt): A Model-Specific Method to Explain Tree-Ensemble Model in Trust Perspective
• Authors: José Ribeiro, Lucas Cardoso, Raíssa Silva, Vitor Cirilo, Níkolas Carneiro, Ronnie Alves,
• Abstract summary: Methods such as Ciu, Dalex, Eli5, Lofo, Shap and Skater emerged to explain black box models. Xirt is able to generate global explanations of tree-ensemble models and also local explanations of instances of models through IRT.
• Score: 0.4749981032986242
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, XAI researchers have been formalizing proposals and developing new methods to explain black box models, with no general consensus in the community on which method to use to explain these models, with this choice being almost directly linked to the popularity of a specific method. Methods such as Ciu, Dalex, Eli5, Lofo, Shap and Skater emerged with the proposal to explain black box models through global rankings of feature relevance, which based on different methodologies, generate global explanations that indicate how the model's inputs explain its predictions. In this context, 41 datasets, 4 tree-ensemble algorithms (Light Gradient Boosting, CatBoost, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting), and 6 XAI methods were used to support the launch of a new XAI method, called eXirt, based on Item Response Theory - IRT and aimed at tree-ensemble black box models that use tabular data referring to binary classification problems. In the first set of analyses, the 164 global feature relevance ranks of the eXirt were compared with 984 ranks of the other XAI methods present in the literature, seeking to highlight their similarities and differences. In a second analysis, exclusive explanations of the eXirt based on Explanation-by-example were presented that help in understanding the model trust. Thus, it was verified that eXirt is able to generate global explanations of tree-ensemble models and also local explanations of instances of models through IRT, showing how this consolidated theory can be used in machine learning in order to obtain explainable and reliable models.

Related papers

• Towards consistency of rule-based explainer and black box model -- fusion of rule induction and XAI-based feature importance [0.0]
  Rule-based models offer a human-understandable representation, i.e. they are interpretable. The generation of such explanations involves the approximation of a black box model by a rule-based model. It has not been investigated whether the rule-based model makes decisions in the same way as the black box model it approximates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T07:56:29Z)
• How Reliable and Stable are Explanations of XAI Methods? [0.4749981032986242]
  Black box models are increasingly being used in the daily lives of human beings living in society. There has been the emergence of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods aimed at generating additional explanations regarding how the model makes certain predictions. It was found that current XAI methods are sensitive to perturbations, with the exception of one specific method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T13:47:41Z)
• Reasoning with trees: interpreting CNNs using hierarchies [3.6763102409647526]
  We introduce a framework that uses hierarchical segmentation techniques for faithful and interpretable explanations of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) Our method constructs model-based hierarchical segmentations that maintain the model's reasoning fidelity. Experiments show that our framework, xAiTrees, delivers highly interpretable and faithful model explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T06:45:19Z)
• Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing. This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z)
• Explaining Explainability: Towards Deeper Actionable Insights into Deep Learning through Second-order Explainability [70.60433013657693]
  Second-order explainable AI (SOXAI) was recently proposed to extend explainable AI (XAI) from the instance level to the dataset level. We demonstrate for the first time, via example classification and segmentation cases, that eliminating irrelevant concepts from the training set based on actionable insights from SOXAI can enhance a model's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T23:24:01Z)
• Learning with Explanation Constraints [91.23736536228485]
  We provide a learning theoretic framework to analyze how explanations can improve the learning of our models. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach over a large array of synthetic and real-world experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T15:06:47Z)
• Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Shap Explanations for machine learning models [0.0]
  We propose a methodology that we define as Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Shap Explanations (LIMASE) This proposed technique uses Shapley values under the LIME paradigm to achieve the following (a) explain prediction of any model by using a locally faithful and interpretable decision tree model on which the Tree Explainer is used to calculate the shapley values and give visually interpretable explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-10T10:07:27Z)
• Explanation-by-Example Based on Item Response Theory [0.0]
  This research explores the Item Response Theory (IRT) as a tool to explaining the models and measuring the level of reliability of the Explanation-by-Example approach. From the test set, 83.8% of the errors are from instances in which the IRT points out the model as unreliable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T14:36:33Z)
• Beyond Explaining: Opportunities and Challenges of XAI-Based Model Improvement [75.00655434905417]
  Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is an emerging research field bringing transparency to highly complex machine learning (ML) models. This paper offers a comprehensive overview over techniques that apply XAI practically for improving various properties of ML models. We show empirically through experiments on toy and realistic settings how explanations can help improve properties such as model generalization ability or reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T15:44:28Z)
• Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations [64.85696493596821]
  In computer vision applications, generative counterfactual methods indicate how to perturb a model's input to change its prediction. We propose a counterfactual method that learns a perturbation in a disentangled latent space that is constrained using a diversity-enforcing loss. Our model improves the success rate of producing high-quality valuable explanations when compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T12:57:34Z)
• Explainable Matrix -- Visualization for Global and Local Interpretability of Random Forest Classification Ensembles [78.6363825307044]
  We propose Explainable Matrix (ExMatrix), a novel visualization method for Random Forest (RF) interpretability. It employs a simple yet powerful matrix-like visual metaphor, where rows are rules, columns are features, and cells are rules predicates. ExMatrix applicability is confirmed via different examples, showing how it can be used in practice to promote RF models interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-08T21:03:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.