Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02001v1
• Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 17:13:48 GMT
• Title: Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Model
• Authors: Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Sylvain Viguier, Anne-Laure Ligozat
• Abstract summary: We quantify the carbon footprint of BLOOM, a 176-billion parameter language model, across its life cycle. We estimate that BLOOM's final training emitted approximately 24.7 tonnes ofcarboneqif we consider only the dynamic power consumption. We conclude with a discussion regarding the difficulty of precisely estimating the carbon footprint of machine learning models.
• Score: 72.65502770895417
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Progress in machine learning (ML) comes with a cost to the environment, given that training ML models requires significant computational resources, energy and materials. In the present article, we aim to quantify the carbon footprint of BLOOM, a 176-billion parameter language model, across its life cycle. We estimate that BLOOM's final training emitted approximately 24.7 tonnes of~\carboneq~if we consider only the dynamic power consumption, and 50.5 tonnes if we account for all processes ranging from equipment manufacturing to energy-based operational consumption. We also study the energy requirements and carbon emissions of its deployment for inference via an API endpoint receiving user queries in real-time. We conclude with a discussion regarding the difficulty of precisely estimating the carbon footprint of ML models and future research directions that can contribute towards improving carbon emissions reporting.

Related papers

• Generative AI for Low-Carbon Artificial Intelligence of Things with Large Language Models [67.0243099823109]
  Generative AI (GAI) holds immense potential to reduce carbon emissions of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) In this article, we explore the potential of GAI for carbon emissions reduction and propose a novel GAI-enabled solution for low-carbon AIoT. We propose a Large Language Model (LLM)-enabled carbon emission optimization framework, in which we design pluggable LLM and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T05:46:28Z)
• LLMCarbon: Modeling the end-to-end Carbon Footprint of Large Language Models [7.132822974156601]
  The carbon footprint of large language models (LLMs) is a significant concern, encompassing emissions from their training, inference, experimentation, and storage processes. We introduce textitcarb, an end-to-end carbon footprint projection model designed for both dense and MoE LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T14:50:04Z)
• A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Environments: Performance and Environmental Impact [62.997667081978825]
  This study seeks to address the demands of high-performance machine learning models with environmental sustainability. Traditional machine learning algorithms, such as Decision Trees and Random Forests, demonstrate robust efficiency and performance. However, superior outcomes were obtained with optimised configurations, albeit with a commensurate increase in resource consumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-01T15:18:00Z)
• Exploring the Carbon Footprint of Hugging Face's ML Models: A Repository Mining Study [8.409033836300761]
  The study includes the first repository mining study on the Hugging Face Hub API on carbon emissions. This study seeks to answer two research questions: (1) how do ML model creators measure and report carbon emissions on Hugging Face Hub?, and (2) what aspects impact the carbon emissions of training ML models?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T17:52:58Z)
• Machine Guided Discovery of Novel Carbon Capture Solvents [48.7576911714538]
  Machine learning offers a promising method for reducing the time and resource burdens of materials development. We have developed an end-to-end "discovery cycle" to select new aqueous amines compatible with the commercially viable acid gas scrubbing carbon capture. The prediction process shows 60% accuracy against experiment for both material parameters and 80% for a single parameter on an external test set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T18:32:38Z)
• Counting Carbon: A Survey of Factors Influencing the Emissions of Machine Learning [77.62876532784759]
  Machine learning (ML) requires using energy to carry out computations during the model training process. The generation of this energy comes with an environmental cost in terms of greenhouse gas emissions, depending on quantity used and the energy source. We present a survey of the carbon emissions of 95 ML models across time and different tasks in natural language processing and computer vision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T18:35:00Z)
• Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instances [91.28501520271972]
  We provide a framework for measuring software carbon intensity, and propose to measure operational carbon emissions. We evaluate a suite of approaches for reducing emissions on the Microsoft Azure cloud compute platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-10T17:04:04Z)
• The Carbon Footprint of Machine Learning Training Will Plateau, Then Shrink [14.427445867512366]
  Four best practices can reduce ML training energy by up to 100x and CO2 emissions up to 1000x. By following best practices, overall ML energy use held steady at 15% of Google's total energy use for the past three years. We recommend that ML papers include emissions explicitly to foster competition on more than just model quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:30:27Z)
• Curb Your Carbon Emissions: Benchmarking Carbon Emissions in Machine Translation [0.0]
  We study the carbon efficiency and look for alternatives to reduce the overall environmental impact of training models. In our work, we assess the performance of models for machine translation, across multiple language pairs. We examine the various components of these models to analyze aspects of our pipeline that can be optimized to reduce these carbon emissions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-26T12:30:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.