Model Evaluation in Medical Datasets Over Time

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07165v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 07:53:36 GMT
• Title: Model Evaluation in Medical Datasets Over Time
• Authors: Helen Zhou, Yuwen Chen, Zachary C. Lipton
• Abstract summary: We introduce the Evaluation on Medical datasets Over Time (EMDOT) framework and Python package, which evaluates the performance of a model class over time. We compare two training strategies: (1) using all historical data, and (2) using a window of the most recent data. We note changes in performance over time, and identify possible explanations for these shocks.
• Score: 26.471486383140526
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning models deployed in healthcare systems face data drawn from continually evolving environments. However, researchers proposing such models typically evaluate them in a time-agnostic manner, with train and test splits sampling patients throughout the entire study period. We introduce the Evaluation on Medical Datasets Over Time (EMDOT) framework and Python package, which evaluates the performance of a model class over time. Across five medical datasets and a variety of models, we compare two training strategies: (1) using all historical data, and (2) using a window of the most recent data. We note changes in performance over time, and identify possible explanations for these shocks.

Related papers

• Membership Inference Attacks Against Time-Series Models [0.8437187555622164]
  Time-series data that contains personal information, particularly in the medical field, presents serious privacy concerns. We explore existing techniques on time-series models, and introduce new features, focusing on seasonality. Our results enhance the effectiveness of MIAs in identifying membership, improving the understanding of privacy risks in medical data applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T07:34:49Z)
• A Data-Centric Perspective on Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Tabular Data [9.57464542357693]
  This paper demonstrates that model-centric evaluations are biased, as real-world modeling pipelines often require dataset-specific preprocessing and feature engineering. We select 10 relevant datasets from Kaggle competitions and implement expert-level preprocessing pipelines for each dataset. After dataset-specific feature engineering, model rankings change considerably, performance differences decrease, and the importance of model selection reduces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T09:54:39Z)
• Distilled Datamodel with Reverse Gradient Matching [74.75248610868685]
  We introduce an efficient framework for assessing data impact, comprising offline training and online evaluation stages. Our proposed method achieves comparable model behavior evaluation while significantly speeding up the process compared to the direct retraining method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T09:16:14Z)
• Recent Advances in Predictive Modeling with Electronic Health Records [71.19967863320647]
  utilizing EHR data for predictive modeling presents several challenges due to its unique characteristics. Deep learning has demonstrated its superiority in various applications, including healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T00:31:01Z)
• MADS: Modulated Auto-Decoding SIREN for time series imputation [9.673093148930874]
  We propose MADS, a novel auto-decoding framework for time series imputation, built upon implicit neural representations. We evaluate our model on two real-world datasets, and show that it outperforms state-of-the-art methods for time series imputation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-03T09:08:47Z)
• Evaluating Model Performance in Medical Datasets Over Time [26.471486383140526]
  This work proposes the Evaluation on Medical datasets Over Time (EMDOT) framework. Inspired by the concept of backtesting, EMDOT simulates possible training procedures that practitioners might have been able to execute at each point in time. We show how depending on the dataset, using all historical data may be ideal in many cases, whereas using a window of the most recent data could be advantageous in others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T19:16:00Z)
• Synthetic Model Combination: An Instance-wise Approach to Unsupervised Ensemble Learning [92.89846887298852]
  Consider making a prediction over new test data without any opportunity to learn from a training set of labelled data. Give access to a set of expert models and their predictions alongside some limited information about the dataset used to train them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T10:20:31Z)
• Pre-training transformer-based framework on large-scale pediatric claims data for downstream population-specific tasks [3.1580072841682734]
  This study presents the Claim Pre-Training (Claim-PT) framework, a generic pre-training model that first trains on the entire pediatric claims dataset. The effective knowledge transfer is completed through the task-aware fine-tuning stage. We conducted experiments on a real-world claims dataset with more than one million patient records.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T15:25:41Z)
• Deep learning-based COVID-19 pneumonia classification using chest CT images: model generalizability [54.86482395312936]
  Deep learning (DL) classification models were trained to identify COVID-19-positive patients on 3D computed tomography (CT) datasets from different countries. We trained nine identical DL-based classification models by using combinations of the datasets with a 72% train, 8% validation, and 20% test data split. The models trained on multiple datasets and evaluated on a test set from one of the datasets used for training performed better.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-18T21:14:52Z)
• Adversarial Sample Enhanced Domain Adaptation: A Case Study on Predictive Modeling with Electronic Health Records [57.75125067744978]
  We propose a data augmentation method to facilitate domain adaptation. adversarially generated samples are used during domain adaptation. Results confirm the effectiveness of our method and the generality on different tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-13T03:20:20Z)
• Temporal Phenotyping using Deep Predictive Clustering of Disease Progression [97.88605060346455]
  We develop a deep learning approach for clustering time-series data, where each cluster comprises patients who share similar future outcomes of interest. Experiments on two real-world datasets show that our model achieves superior clustering performance over state-of-the-art benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T20:48:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.