An Analytics of Culture: Modeling Subjectivity, Scalability, Contextuality, and Temporality

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07460v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 15:42:27 GMT
• Title: An Analytics of Culture: Modeling Subjectivity, Scalability, Contextuality, and Temporality
• Authors: Nanne van Noord, Melvin Wevers, Tobias Blanke, Julia Noordegraaf, Marcel Worring
• Abstract summary: There is a bidirectional relationship between culture and AI; AI models are increasingly used to analyse culture, thereby shaping our understanding of culture. On the other hand, the models are trained on collections of cultural artifacts thereby implicitly, and not always correctly, encoding expressions of culture. This creates a tension that both limits the use of AI for analysing culture and leads to problems in AI with respect to cultural complex issues such as bias.
• Score: 13.638494941763637
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: There is a bidirectional relationship between culture and AI; AI models are increasingly used to analyse culture, thereby shaping our understanding of culture. On the other hand, the models are trained on collections of cultural artifacts thereby implicitly, and not always correctly, encoding expressions of culture. This creates a tension that both limits the use of AI for analysing culture and leads to problems in AI with respect to cultural complex issues such as bias. One approach to overcome this tension is to more extensively take into account the intricacies and complexities of culture. We structure our discussion using four concepts that guide humanistic inquiry into culture: subjectivity, scalability, contextuality, and temporality. We focus on these concepts because they have not yet been sufficiently represented in AI research. We believe that possible implementations of these aspects into AI research leads to AI that better captures the complexities of culture. In what follows, we briefly describe these four concepts and their absence in AI research. For each concept, we define possible research challenges.

Related papers

• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  Recent advances in AI have resulted in technology that can support humans in scientific discovery and decision support but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals. The responsible use of AI increasingly shows the need for human-AI teaming. A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models [53.626808086522985]
  We focus on extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in two text generation tasks. We evaluate model outputs when an explicit cue of culture, specifically nationality, is perturbed in the prompts. We find weak correlations between text similarity of outputs for different countries and the cultural values of these countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T14:03:27Z)
• CulturePark: Boosting Cross-cultural Understanding in Large Language Models [63.452948673344395]
  This paper introduces CulturePark, an LLM-powered multi-agent communication framework for cultural data collection. It generates high-quality cross-cultural dialogues encapsulating human beliefs, norms, and customs. We evaluate these models across three downstream tasks: content moderation, cultural alignment, and cultural education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T01:49:02Z)
• What You Use is What You Get: Unforced Errors in Studying Cultural Aspects in Agile Software Development [2.9418191027447906]
  Investigating the influence of cultural characteristics is challenging due to the multi-faceted concept of culture. Cultural and social aspects are of high importance for their successful use in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T20:08:37Z)
• How Culture Shapes What People Want From AI [0.0]
  There is an urgent need to incorporate the perspectives of culturally diverse groups into AI developments. We present a novel conceptual framework for research that aims to expand, reimagine, and reground mainstream visions of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T07:08:19Z)
• Massively Multi-Cultural Knowledge Acquisition & LM Benchmarking [48.21982147529661]
  This paper introduces a novel approach for massively multicultural knowledge acquisition. Our method strategically navigates from densely informative Wikipedia documents on cultural topics to an extensive network of linked pages. Our work marks an important step towards deeper understanding and bridging the gaps of cultural disparities in AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T18:16:54Z)
• Cultural Bias and Cultural Alignment of Large Language Models [0.9374652839580183]
  We conduct a disaggregated evaluation of cultural bias for five widely used large language models. All models exhibit cultural values resembling English-speaking and Protestant European countries. We suggest using cultural prompting and ongoing evaluation to reduce cultural bias in the output of generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T16:45:56Z)
• Not All Countries Celebrate Thanksgiving: On the Cultural Dominance in Large Language Models [89.94270049334479]
  This paper identifies a cultural dominance issue within large language models (LLMs) LLMs often provide inappropriate English-culture-related answers that are not relevant to the expected culture when users ask in non-English languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T05:38:23Z)
• Towards a Praxis for Intercultural Ethics in Explainable AI [1.90365714903665]
  This article introduces the concept of an intercultural ethics approach to AI explainability. It examines how cultural nuances impact the adoption and use of technology, the factors that impede how technical concepts such as AI are explained, and how integrating an intercultural ethics approach in the development of XAI can improve user understanding and facilitate efficient usage of these methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T07:15:58Z)
• Cultural Incongruencies in Artificial Intelligence [5.817158625734485]
  We describe a set of cultural dependencies and incongruencies in the context of AI-based language and vision technologies. Problems arise when these technologies interact with globally diverse societies and cultures, with different values and interpretive practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-19T18:45:02Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.