Probing for Incremental Parse States in Autoregressive Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09748v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:15:31 GMT
• Title: Probing for Incremental Parse States in Autoregressive Language Models
• Authors: Tiwalayo Eisape, Vineet Gangireddy, Roger P. Levy, Yoon Kim
• Abstract summary: Next-word predictions from autoregressive neural language models show remarkable sensitivity to syntax. This work evaluates the extent to which this behavior arises as a result of a learned ability to maintain implicit representations of incremental syntactic structures.
• Score: 9.166953511173903
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Next-word predictions from autoregressive neural language models show remarkable sensitivity to syntax. This work evaluates the extent to which this behavior arises as a result of a learned ability to maintain implicit representations of incremental syntactic structures. We extend work in syntactic probing to the incremental setting and present several probes for extracting incomplete syntactic structure (operationalized through parse states from a stack-based parser) from autoregressive language models. We find that our probes can be used to predict model preferences on ambiguous sentence prefixes and causally intervene on model representations and steer model behavior. This suggests implicit incremental syntactic inferences underlie next-word predictions in autoregressive neural language models.

Related papers

• Counterfactual Generation from Language Models [64.55296662926919]
  We show that counterfactual reasoning is conceptually distinct from interventions. We propose a framework for generating true string counterfactuals. Our experiments demonstrate that the approach produces meaningful counterfactuals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T17:57:30Z)
• Token-wise Decomposition of Autoregressive Language Model Hidden States for Analyzing Model Predictions [9.909170013118775]
  This work presents a linear decomposition of final hidden states from autoregressive language models based on each initial input token. Using the change in next-word probability as a measure of importance, this work first examines which context words make the biggest contribution to language model predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T23:55:32Z)
• When Does Syntax Mediate Neural Language Model Performance? Evidence from Dropout Probes [27.70448935595472]
  We show that models encode syntactic information redundantly and introduce a new probe design that guides probes to consider all syntactic information present in embeddings. We find evidence for the use of syntax in models where prior methods did not, allowing us to boost model performance by injecting syntactic information into representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-20T18:09:36Z)
• Pathologies of Pre-trained Language Models in Few-shot Fine-tuning [50.3686606679048]
  We show that pre-trained language models with few examples show strong prediction bias across labels. Although few-shot fine-tuning can mitigate the prediction bias, our analysis shows models gain performance improvement by capturing non-task-related features. These observations alert that pursuing model performance with fewer examples may incur pathological prediction behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T15:55:18Z)
• On The Ingredients of an Effective Zero-shot Semantic Parser [95.01623036661468]
  We analyze zero-shot learning by paraphrasing training examples of canonical utterances and programs from a grammar. We propose bridging these gaps using improved grammars, stronger paraphrasers, and efficient learning methods. Our model achieves strong performance on two semantic parsing benchmarks (Scholar, Geo) with zero labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T21:41:16Z)
• On the Lack of Robust Interpretability of Neural Text Classifiers [14.685352584216757]
  We assess the robustness of interpretations of neural text classifiers based on pretrained Transformer encoders. Both tests show surprising deviations from expected behavior, raising questions about the extent of insights that practitioners may draw from interpretations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T18:31:02Z)
• Infusing Finetuning with Semantic Dependencies [62.37697048781823]
  We show that, unlike syntax, semantics is not brought to the surface by today's pretrained models. We then use convolutional graph encoders to explicitly incorporate semantic parses into task-specific finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T01:27:24Z)
• Explicitly Modeling Syntax in Language Models with Incremental Parsing and a Dynamic Oracle [88.65264818967489]
  We propose a new syntax-aware language model: Syntactic Ordered Memory (SOM) The model explicitly models the structure with an incremental and maintains the conditional probability setting of a standard language model. Experiments show that SOM can achieve strong results in language modeling, incremental parsing and syntactic generalization tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-21T17:39:15Z)
• Explaining and Improving Model Behavior with k Nearest Neighbor Representations [107.24850861390196]
  We propose using k nearest neighbor representations to identify training examples responsible for a model's predictions. We show that kNN representations are effective at uncovering learned spurious associations. Our results indicate that the kNN approach makes the finetuned model more robust to adversarial inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-18T16:55:25Z)
• Linguistically inspired morphological inflection with a sequence to sequence model [19.892441884896893]
  Our research question is whether a neural network would be capable of learning inflectional morphemes for inflection production. We are using an inflectional corpus and a single layer seq2seq model to test this hypothesis. Our character-morpheme-based model creates inflection by predicting the stem character-to-character and the inflectional affixes as character blocks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-04T08:58:42Z)
• Overestimation of Syntactic Representationin Neural Language Models [16.765097098482286]
  One popular method for determining a model's ability to induce syntactic structure trains a model on strings generated according to a template then tests the model's ability to distinguish such strings from superficially similar ones with different syntax. We illustrate a fundamental problem with this approach by reproducing positive results from a recent paper with two non-syntactic baseline language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-10T15:13:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.