Relative facts do not exist. Relational Quantum Mechanics is Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics. Response to the critique by Aur\'elien Drezet

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.09025v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 14:13:56 GMT
• Title: Relative facts do not exist. Relational Quantum Mechanics is Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics. Response to the critique by Aur\'elien Drezet
• Authors: Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek \.Zukowski
• Abstract summary: We point out that our critical analysis of RQM was precisely based on the most recent formulation of RQM, and that the theses in the critique are based on neither RQM assumptions nor on our arguments.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this comment we answer to the recent critique of our article [arXiv:2208.11793] about Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) by Aur\'elien Drezet [arXiv:2209.01237]. Here we point out that our critical analysis of RQM was precisely based on the most recent formulation of RQM, and that the theses found in the critique are based on neither RQM assumptions nor on our arguments.

Related papers

• Relational Quantum Mechanics with Cross-Perspective Links Postulate: an Internally Inconsistent Scheme [0.0]
  We discuss the status of relative facts in the context of the new amendment to RQM called cross-perspective links. We show that RQM with cross-perspective links axiom is an internally inconsistent hidden variable theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T08:12:37Z)
• Relational Quantum Mechanics is Still Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We show that a central concept in Quantum Mechanics, are inconsistent with Quantum Mechanics. Our work has been criticized by Cavalcanti, Di Biagio, Rovelli (CDR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T09:34:17Z)
• Work statistics, quantum signatures and enhanced work extraction in quadratic fermionic models [62.997667081978825]
  In quadratic fermionic models we determine a quantum correction to the work statistics after a sudden and a time-dependent driving. Such a correction lies in the non-commutativity of the initial quantum state and the time-dependent Hamiltonian. Thanks to the latter, one can assess the onset of non-classical signatures in the KDQ distribution of work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-27T13:42:40Z)
• Can a Bohmian be a Rovellian for all practical purposes? [0.0]
  We first show that the mathematical formalism of RQM is immune to recent critics concerning consistency. We also analyse the notion of interaction in RQM and provide a For All Practical Purposes (FAPP) reading of RQM comparing it with Bohmian mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T11:00:56Z)
• A critical analysis of `Relative facts do not exist. Relational quantum mechanics is incompatible with quantum mechanics' by Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek \'{Z}ukowski [0.0]
  We discuss a recent work by J.Lawrence et al.[arxiv.org/abs/2208.11793] criticizing relational quantum mechanics (RQM) and based on a famous nonlocality theorem. Here, we show that the claims presented in this recent work are unjustified and we debunk the analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-02T18:52:17Z)
• Symmetric Pruning in Quantum Neural Networks [111.438286016951]
  Quantum neural networks (QNNs) exert the power of modern quantum machines. QNNs with handcraft symmetric ansatzes generally experience better trainability than those with asymmetric ansatzes. We propose the effective quantum neural tangent kernel (EQNTK) to quantify the convergence of QNNs towards the global optima.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-30T08:17:55Z)
• On a gap in the proof of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma and its consequences for the reversibility of quantum resources [51.243733928201024]
  We show that the proof of the generalised quantum Stein's lemma is not correct due to a gap in the argument leading to Lemma III.9. This puts into question a number of established results in the literature, in particular the reversibility of quantum entanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T17:46:05Z)
• Quantum nonreciprocal interactions via dissipative gauge symmetry [18.218574433422535]
  One-way nonreciprocal interactions between two quantum systems are typically described by a cascaded quantum master equation. We present a new approach for obtaining nonreciprocal quantum interactions that is completely distinct from cascaded quantum systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T15:34:40Z)
• A reply to Rovelli's response to our "Assessing Relational Quantum Mechanics'' [0.0]
  We show that our assessment judges RQM on its own terms. We prove false Rovelli's claim that RQM provides a satisfactory, realistic, non-solipsistic description of the world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-13T02:36:45Z)
• Sampling Overhead Analysis of Quantum Error Mitigation: Uncoded vs. Coded Systems [69.33243249411113]
  We show that Pauli errors incur the lowest sampling overhead among a large class of realistic quantum channels. We conceive a scheme amalgamating QEM with quantum channel coding, and analyse its sampling overhead reduction compared to pure QEM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-15T15:51:27Z)
• Quantum-optimal-control-inspired ansatz for variational quantum algorithms [105.54048699217668]
  A central component of variational quantum algorithms (VQA) is the state-preparation circuit, also known as ansatz or variational form. Here, we show that this approach is not always advantageous by introducing ans"atze that incorporate symmetry-breaking unitaries. This work constitutes a first step towards the development of a more general class of symmetry-breaking ans"atze with applications to physics and chemistry problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-03T18:00:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.