A response to criticisms on "CMB Constraints Cast a Shadow on CSL Model"

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.04067v3
• Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 05:09:38 GMT
• Title: A response to criticisms on "CMB Constraints Cast a Shadow on CSL Model"
• Authors: Jerome Martin, Vincent Vennin
• Abstract summary: We explain why the arguments presented in [G. R. Bengochea, G. Leon, P. Pearle, and D. Sudarsky, arXiv:2008.05285, see also arXiv:2006.05313] are either incorrect or a confirmation of the robustness of our results.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Our recent letter "Cosmic Microwave Background Constraints Cast a Shadow On Continuous Spontaneous Localization Models" [arXiv:1906.04405] has recently been criticised in [G. R. Bengochea, G. Leon, P. Pearle, and D. Sudarsky, arXiv:2008.05285, see also arXiv:2006.05313]. In this reply, we explain why the arguments presented in those articles are either incorrect or a confirmation of the robustness of our results.

Related papers

• A No-Go Theorem for ψ-ontic Models? Yes! Response to Criticisms [0.0]
  The essay aims to respond to such objections and to show once again that the theorem proved in our paper is correct, and therefore true - contrary to Gao's claims.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-26T11:41:13Z)
• Kochen-Specker for many qubits and the classical limit [55.2480439325792]
  It is shown that quantum and classical predictions converge as the number of qubits is increases to the macroscopic scale. This way to explain the classical limit concurs with, and improves, a result previously reported for GHZ states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T22:30:58Z)
• New physics in spin entanglement [44.99833362998488]
  We propose a theory that preserves spin-summed scattering and decay rates at tree level while affecting particle spins. This is achieved by breaking the Lorentz group in a non-local way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T18:00:17Z)
• Estimating the Causal Effect of Early ArXiving on Paper Acceptance [56.538813945721685]
  We estimate the effect of arXiving a paper before the reviewing period (early arXiving) on its acceptance to the conference. Our results suggest that early arXiving may have a small effect on a paper's chances of acceptance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-24T07:45:38Z)
• Krylov complexity in quantum field theory, and beyond [44.99833362998488]
  We study Krylov complexity in various models of quantum field theory. We find that the exponential growth of Krylov complexity satisfies the conjectural inequality, which generalizes the Maldacena-Shenker-Stanford bound on chaos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-29T19:00:00Z)
• Reply to "Masanes-Galley-M\"uller and the State-Update Postulate" [0.0]
  We argue that the criticism is unfounded. In particular, and in contrast to Stacey's claims, our proof does not assume linearity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-07T13:38:42Z)
• A critical analysis of `Relative facts do not exist. Relational quantum mechanics is incompatible with quantum mechanics' by Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek \'{Z}ukowski [0.0]
  We discuss a recent work by J.Lawrence et al.[arxiv.org/abs/2208.11793] criticizing relational quantum mechanics (RQM) and based on a famous nonlocality theorem. Here, we show that the claims presented in this recent work are unjustified and we debunk the analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-02T18:52:17Z)
• Reply to Galilean invariance without superluminal particles [0.0]
  In a recent comment [arXiv:2112.05658], Grudka and W'ojcik object to some of our earlier claims concerning a link between fundamental postulates of quantum theory and special relativity extended to superluminal frames of reference. In this short reply we refute these criticisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T15:12:25Z)
• Reply to arXiv:2111.13357 ("The Quantum Eraser Non-Paradox'') [0.0]
  We argue that we have forgotten to consider superpositions of detector eigenstates. We also note that no one has ever observed such detector superpositions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-01T11:55:02Z)
• ArXiving Before Submission Helps Everyone [38.09600429721343]
  We analyze the pros and cons of arXiving papers. We see no reasons why anyone but the authors should decide whether to arXiv or not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-11T22:26:44Z)
• De-anonymization of authors through arXiv submissions during double-blind review [33.15282901539867]
  We investigate the effects of releasing arXiv preprints of papers undergoing a double-blind review process. We find statistically significant evidence of positive correlation between percentage acceptance and papers with high reputation released on arXiv.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-01T01:40:06Z)
• Comment on "Cosmic Microwave Background Constraints Cast a Shadow On Continuous Spontaneous Localization Models" [0.0]
  We argue that, for most natural choices, the direct application of the continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) theory to the inflationary case is ruled out by observational data. We point out that such results are based on the consideration of a rather narrow set of choices for the application of the theory to the cosmological context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T00:44:25Z)
• Fractional Underdamped Langevin Dynamics: Retargeting SGD with Momentum under Heavy-Tailed Gradient Noise [39.9241638707715]
  We show that FULD has similarities with enatural and egradient methods on their role in deep learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T18:04:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.