A probabilistic autoencoder for causal discovery
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.04235v1
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:33:16 GMT
- Title: A probabilistic autoencoder for causal discovery
- Abstract summary: The paper addresses the problem of finding the causal direction between two associated variables.
The proposed solution is to build an autoencoder of their joint distribution and to maximize its estimation capacity.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The paper addresses the problem of finding the causal direction between two
associated variables. The proposed solution is to build an autoencoder of their
joint distribution and to maximize its estimation capacity relative to both the
marginal distributions. It is shown that the resulting two capacities cannot,
in general, be equal. This leads to a new criterion for causal discovery: the
higher capacity is consistent with the unconstrained choice of a distribution
representing the cause while the lower capacity reflects the constraints
imposed by the mechanism on the distribution of the effect. Estimation capacity
is defined as the ability of the auto-encoder to represent arbitrary datasets.
A regularization term forces it to decide which one of the variables to model
in a more generic way i.e., while maintaining higher model capacity. The causal
direction is revealed by the constraints encountered while encoding the data
instead of being measured as a property of the data itself. The idea is
implemented and tested using a restricted Boltzmann machine.
Related papers
- Representational Capacity: Geometric Limits on Feature Representation in Transformer Language Models [51.56484100374058]
We develop a framework for estimating how many near-orthogonal directions a model can support.<n>Applying this metric across dozens of open-source models reveals two classes: models with high $varepsilon$ whose embeddings lack near-orthogonal structure, and models with low $varepsilon$ that maintain it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-01T18:28:56Z) - Variational Distributional Neuron [0.0]
A compute unit formulated as a VAE brick carries a prior, an amortized posterior and a local ELBO.<n>We analyze "collapse" modes and the conditions for a "living neuron"<n>We then extend the contribution over time via autoregressive priors over the latent, per unit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-20T14:35:53Z) - Decoupling the Effect of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Human Label Variation Perspective [60.45433515408158]
We show that long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) serves as a decisive decision-maker for the top option but fails to function as a granular distribution calibrator for ambiguous tasks.<n>We observe a distinct "decoupled mechanism": while CoT improves distributional alignment, final accuracy is dictated by CoT content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T16:26:40Z) - Statistical Inference for Conditional Group Distributionally Robust Optimization with Cross-Entropy Loss [9.054486124506521]
We study multi-source unsupervised domain adaptation, where labeled data are drawn from multiple source domains and only unlabeled data from a target domain.<n>We propose a novel Conditional Conditional Optimization (CG-DRO) framework that learns a classifier by minimizing the worst-case cross-entropy loss over the convex combinations of the conditional outcome distributions from the sources.<n>We establish fast statistical convergence rates for the estimator by constructing two surrogate minimax optimization problems that serve as theoretical bridges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-14T04:21:23Z) - Invariant Representations via Wasserstein Correlation Maximization [0.6554326244334866]
This work investigates the use of Wasserstein correlation for unsupervised representation learning.<n>We find that an (auto)encoder trained to maximize correlation between the input and distributions instead acts as a compressor.<n>We also establish various theoretical results for optimal transport-based dependence measures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-16T21:11:51Z) - Nested Stochastic Gradient Descent for (Generalized) Sinkhorn Distance-Regularized Distributionally Robust Optimization [4.989068568135242]
Distributionally robust shift optimization (DRO) is a powerful technique to robust models against data distribution.
This paper aims to solve regularized non DRO problems, where the uncertainty is modeled by a so-called generalized approximation function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-29T01:01:02Z) - Disentangled Latent Spaces for Reduced Order Models using Deterministic Autoencoders [0.0]
More interpretability can be gained by disentangling the latent variables and analyzing the resulting modes.
Probabilistic autoencoders ($beta$-VAEs) are frequently used in computational fluid dynamics.
We show that competitive results can be achieved using non-probabilistic autoencoder approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T16:09:57Z) - Complexity Matters: Rethinking the Latent Space for Generative Modeling [65.64763873078114]
In generative modeling, numerous successful approaches leverage a low-dimensional latent space, e.g., Stable Diffusion.
In this study, we aim to shed light on this under-explored topic by rethinking the latent space from the perspective of model complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-17T07:12:29Z) - Optimal Regularization for a Data Source [8.38093977965175]
It is common to augment criteria that enforce data fidelity with a regularizer that promotes quantity in the solution.
In this paper we seek a systematic understanding of the power and the limitations of convex regularization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-27T20:11:59Z) - Neuro-Symbolic Entropy Regularization [78.16196949641079]
In structured prediction, the goal is to jointly predict many output variables that together encode a structured object.
One approach -- entropy regularization -- posits that decision boundaries should lie in low-probability regions.
We propose a loss, neuro-symbolic entropy regularization, that encourages the model to confidently predict a valid object.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-25T06:23:10Z) - Understanding Interlocking Dynamics of Cooperative Rationalization [90.6863969334526]
Selective rationalization explains the prediction of complex neural networks by finding a small subset of the input that is sufficient to predict the neural model output.
We reveal a major problem with such cooperative rationalization paradigm -- model interlocking.
We propose a new rationalization framework, called A2R, which introduces a third component into the architecture, a predictor driven by soft attention as opposed to selection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-26T17:39:18Z) - Inferential Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks [9.859829604054127]
We introduce a novel inferential Wasserstein GAN (iWGAN) model, which is a principled framework to fuse auto-encoders and WGANs.
The iWGAN greatly mitigates the symptom of mode collapse, speeds up the convergence, and is able to provide a measurement of quality check for each individual sample.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-13T00:43:21Z) - Low-rank Characteristic Tensor Density Estimation Part II: Compression
and Latent Density Estimation [31.631861197477185]
Learning generative probabilistic models is a core problem in machine learning.
This paper proposes a joint dimensionality reduction and non-parametric density estimation framework.
We demonstrate that the proposed model achieves very promising results on regression tasks, sampling, and anomaly detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-20T00:38:56Z) - Latent Causal Invariant Model [128.7508609492542]
Current supervised learning can learn spurious correlation during the data-fitting process.
We propose a Latent Causal Invariance Model (LaCIM) which pursues causal prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-04T10:00:27Z) - General stochastic separation theorems with optimal bounds [68.8204255655161]
Phenomenon of separability was revealed and used in machine learning to correct errors of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems and analyze AI instabilities.
Errors or clusters of errors can be separated from the rest of the data.
The ability to correct an AI system also opens up the possibility of an attack on it, and the high dimensionality induces vulnerabilities caused by the same separability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-11T13:12:41Z) - Generalizing Variational Autoencoders with Hierarchical Empirical Bayes [6.273154057349038]
We present Hierarchical Empirical Bayes Autoencoder (HEBAE), a computationally stable framework for probabilistic generative models.
Our key contributions are two-fold. First, we make gains by placing a hierarchical prior over the encoding distribution, enabling us to adaptively balance the trade-off between minimizing the reconstruction loss function and avoiding over-regularization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-20T18:18:39Z) - A Critical View of the Structural Causal Model [89.43277111586258]
We show that one can identify the cause and the effect without considering their interaction at all.
We propose a new adversarial training method that mimics the disentangled structure of the causal model.
Our multidimensional method outperforms the literature methods on both synthetic and real world datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-23T22:52:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.