Assessing the Capacity of Transformer to Abstract Syntactic Representations: A Contrastive Analysis Based on Long-distance Agreement

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.04523v1
• Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 19:10:46 GMT
• Title: Assessing the Capacity of Transformer to Abstract Syntactic Representations: A Contrastive Analysis Based on Long-distance Agreement
• Abstract summary: The long-distance agreement is increasingly used to assess the syntactic generalization of Neural Language Models. Much work has shown that transformers are capable of high accuracy in varied agreement tasks. This work contrasts how they handle two superficially similar but theoretically distinct agreement phenomena.
• Score: 4.995343972237368
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The long-distance agreement, evidence for syntactic structure, is increasingly used to assess the syntactic generalization of Neural Language Models. Much work has shown that transformers are capable of high accuracy in varied agreement tasks, but the mechanisms by which the models accomplish this behavior are still not well understood. To better understand transformers' internal working, this work contrasts how they handle two superficially similar but theoretically distinct agreement phenomena: subject-verb and object-past participle agreement in French. Using probing and counterfactual analysis methods, our experiments show that i) the agreement task suffers from several confounders which partially question the conclusions drawn so far and ii) transformers handle subject-verb and object-past participle agreements in a way that is consistent with their modeling in theoretical linguistics.

Related papers

• Causal Drawbridges: Characterizing Gradient Blocking of Syntactic Islands in Transformer LMs [11.31435294855236]
  We show how causal interventions in Transformer models provide insights into English syntax by focusing on a long-standing challenge for syntactic theory: syntactic islands.<n>We show that modern Transformer language models replicate human judgments across this gradient.<n>We derive a novel linguistic hypothesis: the conjunction "and" is represented differently in extractable versus non-extractable constructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T15:03:33Z)
• Diverging Transformer Predictions for Human Sentence Processing: A Comprehensive Analysis of Agreement Attraction Effects [6.1335559884409685]
  Transformers underlie almost all state-of-the-art language models in computational linguistics.<n>We use a surprisal-based linking mechanism to evaluate eleven autoregressive transformers of varying sizes and architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T14:27:46Z)
• On the Entity-Level Alignment in Crosslingual Consistency [62.33186691736433]
  SubSub and SubInj integrate English translations of subjects into prompts across languages, leading to substantial gains in factual recall accuracy and consistency.<n>These interventions reinforce the entity representation alignment in the conceptual space through model's internal pivot-language processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T16:26:50Z)
• How do Transformers Learn Implicit Reasoning? [67.02072851088637]
  We study how implicit multi-hop reasoning emerges by training transformers from scratch in a controlled symbolic environment.<n>We find that training with atomic triples is not necessary but accelerates learning, and that second-hop generalization relies on query-level exposure to specific compositional structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:02:49Z)
• Characterizing the Expressivity of Transformer Language Models [56.598551673153366]
  We provide an exact characterization of fixed-precision transformers with strict future masking and soft attention.<n>We show that these models are precisely as expressive as a specific fragment of linear temporal logic.<n>We further relate this logic to established classes in formal language theory, automata theory, and algebra.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T16:30:30Z)
• Comateformer: Combined Attention Transformer for Semantic Sentence Matching [11.746010399185437]
  We propose a novel semantic sentence matching model named Combined Attention Network based on Transformer model (Comateformer) In Comateformer model, we design a novel transformer-based quasi-attention mechanism with compositional properties. Our proposed approach builds on the intuition of similarity and dissimilarity (negative affinity) when calculating dual affinity scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T06:18:07Z)
• Explaining Text Similarity in Transformer Models [52.571158418102584]
  Recent advances in explainable AI have made it possible to mitigate limitations by leveraging improved explanations for Transformers. We use BiLRP, an extension developed for computing second-order explanations in bilinear similarity models, to investigate which feature interactions drive similarity in NLP models. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of different semantic similarity tasks and models, highlighting how novel explainable AI methods enable in-depth analyses and corpus-level insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:11:31Z)
• How Do Transformers Learn Topic Structure: Towards a Mechanistic Understanding [56.222097640468306]
  We provide mechanistic understanding of how transformers learn "semantic structure" We show, through a combination of mathematical analysis and experiments on Wikipedia data, that the embedding layer and the self-attention layer encode the topical structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T21:42:17Z)
• Visual Comparison of Language Model Adaptation [55.92129223662381]
  adapters are lightweight alternatives for model adaptation. In this paper, we discuss several design and alternatives for interactive, comparative visual explanation methods. We show that, for instance, an adapter trained on the language debiasing task according to context-0 embeddings introduces a new type of bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T09:25:28Z)
• Are Transformers a Modern Version of ELIZA? Observations on French Object Verb Agreement [5.448283690603357]
  We show that it is possible to achieve high accuracy on this agreement task with simple surfaces. Our fine-grained analyses of results on the long-range French object-verb agreement show that contrary to LSTMs, Transformers are able to capture a non-trivial amount of grammatical structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-21T12:33:11Z)
• Did the Cat Drink the Coffee? Challenging Transformers with Generalized Event Knowledge [59.22170796793179]
  Transformers Language Models (TLMs) were tested on a benchmark for the textitdynamic estimation of thematic fit Our results show that TLMs can reach performances that are comparable to those achieved by SDM. However, additional analysis consistently suggests that TLMs do not capture important aspects of event knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-22T20:52:26Z)
• Accounting for Agreement Phenomena in Sentence Comprehension with Transformer Language Models: Effects of Similarity-based Interference on Surprisal and Attention [4.103438743479001]
  We advance an explanation of similarity-based interference effects in subject-verb and reflexive pronoun agreement processing. We show that surprisal of the verb or reflexive pronoun predicts facilitatory interference effects in ungrammatical sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T20:46:54Z)
• Understanding Synonymous Referring Expressions via Contrastive Features [105.36814858748285]
  We develop an end-to-end trainable framework to learn contrastive features on the image and object instance levels. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the proposed algorithm on several benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-20T17:56:24Z)
• Syntactic Perturbations Reveal Representational Correlates of Hierarchical Phrase Structure in Pretrained Language Models [22.43510769150502]
  It is not entirely clear what aspects of sentence-level syntax are captured by vector-based language representations. We show that Transformers build sensitivity to larger parts of the sentence along their layers, and that hierarchical phrase structure plays a role in this process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T16:30:31Z)
• Assessing Phrasal Representation and Composition in Transformers [13.460125148455143]
  Deep transformer models have pushed performance on NLP tasks to new limits. We present systematic analysis of phrasal representations in state-of-the-art pre-trained transformers. We find that phrase representation in these models relies heavily on word content, with little evidence of nuanced composition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T04:59:39Z)
• Is Supervised Syntactic Parsing Beneficial for Language Understanding? An Empirical Investigation [71.70562795158625]
  Traditional NLP has long held (supervised) syntactic parsing necessary for successful higher-level semantic language understanding (LU) Recent advent of end-to-end neural models, self-supervised via language modeling (LM), and their success on a wide range of LU tasks, questions this belief. We empirically investigate the usefulness of supervised parsing for semantic LU in the context of LM-pretrained transformer networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-15T21:03:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.