Localized Latent Updates for Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.06556v1
• Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:15:20 GMT
• Title: Localized Latent Updates for Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models
• Authors: Moritz Ibing, Isaak Lim, Leif Kobbelt
• Abstract summary: In this work we suggest a lightweight adapter, that only updates the models predictions close to seen datapoints. We demonstrate the effectiveness and speed of this relatively simple approach in the context of few-shot learning, where our results both on classes seen and unseen during training are comparable with or improve on the state of the art.
• Score: 15.285292154680246
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Although massive pre-trained vision-language models like CLIP show impressive generalization capabilities for many tasks, still it often remains necessary to fine-tune them for improved performance on specific datasets. When doing so, it is desirable that updating the model is fast and that the model does not lose its capabilities on data outside of the dataset, as is often the case with classical fine-tuning approaches. In this work we suggest a lightweight adapter, that only updates the models predictions close to seen datapoints. We demonstrate the effectiveness and speed of this relatively simple approach in the context of few-shot learning, where our results both on classes seen and unseen during training are comparable with or improve on the state of the art.

Related papers

• POINTS: Improving Your Vision-language Model with Affordable Strategies [28.611705477757454]
  We train a robust baseline model using latest advancements in vision-language models. We filter pre-training data using perplexity, selecting the lowest perplexity data for training. During visual instruction tuning, we used model soup on different datasets when adding more datasets yielded marginal improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T13:41:37Z)
• Data-efficient Large Vision Models through Sequential Autoregression [58.26179273091461]
  We develop an efficient, autoregression-based vision model on a limited dataset. We demonstrate how this model achieves proficiency in a spectrum of visual tasks spanning both high-level and low-level semantic understanding. Our empirical evaluations underscore the model's agility in adapting to various tasks, heralding a significant reduction in the parameter footprint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T13:41:53Z)
• Robust Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models for Domain Generalization [6.7181844004432385]
  Foundation models have impressive zero-shot inference capabilities and robustness under distribution shifts. We present a new recipe for few-shot fine-tuning of the popular vision-language foundation model CLIP. Our experimentation demonstrates that, while zero-shot CLIP fails to match performance of trained vision models on more complex benchmarks, few-shot CLIP fine-tuning outperforms its vision-only counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T20:50:40Z)
• A Simple and Efficient Baseline for Data Attribution on Images [107.12337511216228]
  Current state-of-the-art approaches require a large ensemble of as many as 300,000 models to accurately attribute model predictions. In this work, we focus on a minimalist baseline, utilizing the feature space of a backbone pretrained via self-supervised learning to perform data attribution. Our method is model-agnostic and scales easily to large datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T17:29:46Z)
• Efficiently Robustify Pre-trained Models [18.392732966487582]
  robustness of large scale models towards real-world settings is still a less-explored topic. We first benchmark the performance of these models under different perturbations and datasets. We then discuss on how complete model fine-tuning based existing robustification schemes might not be a scalable option given very large scale networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T08:07:49Z)
• Revealing the Underlying Patterns: Investigating Dataset Similarity, Performance, and Generalization [0.0]
  Supervised deep learning models require significant amount of labeled data to achieve an acceptable performance on a specific task. We establish image-image, dataset-dataset, and image-dataset distances to gain insights into the model's behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T13:35:53Z)
• Retrieval-Enhanced Contrastive Vision-Text Models [61.783728119255365]
  We propose to equip vision-text models with the ability to refine their embedding with cross-modal retrieved information from a memory at inference time. Remarkably, we show that this can be done with a light-weight, single-layer, fusion transformer on top of a frozen CLIP. Our experiments validate that our retrieval-enhanced contrastive (RECO) training improves CLIP performance substantially on several challenging fine-grained tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-12T15:52:02Z)
• Beyond Transfer Learning: Co-finetuning for Action Localisation [64.07196901012153]
  We propose co-finetuning -- simultaneously training a single model on multiple upstream'' and downstream'' tasks. We demonstrate that co-finetuning outperforms traditional transfer learning when using the same total amount of data. We also show how we can easily extend our approach to multiple upstream'' datasets to further improve performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-08T10:25:47Z)
• Exploring Strategies for Generalizable Commonsense Reasoning with Pre-trained Models [62.28551903638434]
  We measure the impact of three different adaptation methods on the generalization and accuracy of models. Experiments with two models show that fine-tuning performs best, by learning both the content and the structure of the task, but suffers from overfitting and limited generalization to novel answers. We observe that alternative adaptation methods like prefix-tuning have comparable accuracy, but generalize better to unseen answers and are more robust to adversarial splits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-07T03:13:06Z)
• Models, Pixels, and Rewards: Evaluating Design Trade-offs in Visual Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [109.74041512359476]
  We study a number of design decisions for the predictive model in visual MBRL algorithms. We find that a range of design decisions that are often considered crucial, such as the use of latent spaces, have little effect on task performance. We show how this phenomenon is related to exploration and how some of the lower-scoring models on standard benchmarks will perform the same as the best-performing models when trained on the same training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T18:03:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.