Exploring Strategies for Generalizable Commonsense Reasoning with Pre-trained Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.02837v1
• Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 03:13:06 GMT
• Title: Exploring Strategies for Generalizable Commonsense Reasoning with Pre-trained Models
• Authors: Kaixin Ma, Filip Ilievski, Jonathan Francis, Satoru Ozaki, Eric Nyberg, Alessandro Oltramari
• Abstract summary: We measure the impact of three different adaptation methods on the generalization and accuracy of models. Experiments with two models show that fine-tuning performs best, by learning both the content and the structure of the task, but suffers from overfitting and limited generalization to novel answers. We observe that alternative adaptation methods like prefix-tuning have comparable accuracy, but generalize better to unseen answers and are more robust to adversarial splits.
• Score: 62.28551903638434
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Commonsense reasoning benchmarks have been largely solved by fine-tuning language models. The downside is that fine-tuning may cause models to overfit to task-specific data and thereby forget their knowledge gained during pre-training. Recent works only propose lightweight model updates as models may already possess useful knowledge from past experience, but a challenge remains in understanding what parts and to what extent models should be refined for a given task. In this paper, we investigate what models learn from commonsense reasoning datasets. We measure the impact of three different adaptation methods on the generalization and accuracy of models. Our experiments with two models show that fine-tuning performs best, by learning both the content and the structure of the task, but suffers from overfitting and limited generalization to novel answers. We observe that alternative adaptation methods like prefix-tuning have comparable accuracy, but generalize better to unseen answers and are more robust to adversarial splits.

Related papers

• A Hitchhiker's Guide to Scaling Law Estimation [56.06982415792523]
  Scaling laws predict the loss of a target machine learning model by extrapolating from easier-to-train models with fewer parameters or smaller training sets. We estimate more than 1000 scaling laws, then derive a set of best practices for estimating scaling laws in new model families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T17:59:10Z)
• Gradual Learning: Optimizing Fine-Tuning with Partially Mastered Knowledge in Large Language Models [51.20499954955646]
  Large language models (LLMs) acquire vast amounts of knowledge from extensive text corpora during the pretraining phase. In later stages such as fine-tuning and inference, the model may encounter knowledge not covered in the initial training. We propose a two-stage fine-tuning strategy to improve the model's overall test accuracy and knowledge retention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T08:35:16Z)
• LEVI: Generalizable Fine-tuning via Layer-wise Ensemble of Different Views [28.081794908107604]
  Fine-tuning is used to leverage the power of pre-trained foundation models in new downstream tasks. Recent studies have observed challenges in the generalization of fine-tuned models to unseen distributions. We propose a novel generalizable fine-tuning method LEVI, where the pre-trained model is adaptively ensembled layer-wise with a small task-specific model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T08:16:40Z)
• Fantastic Gains and Where to Find Them: On the Existence and Prospect of General Knowledge Transfer between Any Pretrained Model [74.62272538148245]
  We show that for arbitrary pairings of pretrained models, one model extracts significant data context unavailable in the other. We investigate if it is possible to transfer such "complementary" knowledge from one model to another without performance degradation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:46Z)
• Few-shot Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning: A Fair Comparison and Evaluation [35.72916406365469]
  We compare the generalization of few-shot fine-tuning and in-context learning to challenge datasets. Our results show that fine-tuned language models can in fact generalize well out-of-domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T13:55:17Z)
• Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models [51.8162883997512]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained language models has become the prevalent paradigm for building downstream NLP models. This creates a barrier to fusing knowledge across individual models to yield a better single model. We propose a dataless knowledge fusion method that merges models in their parameter space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T20:46:43Z)
• Investigating Ensemble Methods for Model Robustness Improvement of Text Classifiers [66.36045164286854]
  We analyze a set of existing bias features and demonstrate there is no single model that works best for all the cases. By choosing an appropriate bias model, we can obtain a better robustness result than baselines with a more sophisticated model design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T17:52:10Z)
• Evaluating the Impact of Model Scale for Compositional Generalization in Semantic Parsing [38.770055054268965]
  Recent work has shown considerable improvements on many NLP tasks from model scaling. Fine-tuning generally has flat or negative scaling curves on out-of-distribution compositional generalization. In-context learning has positive scaling curves, but is generally outperformed by much smaller fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T17:57:39Z)
• Uncertainty Estimation for Language Reward Models [5.33024001730262]
  Language models can learn a range of capabilities from unsupervised training on text corpora. It is often easier for humans to choose between options than to provide labeled data, and prior work has achieved state-of-the-art performance by training a reward model from such preference comparisons. We seek to address these problems via uncertainty estimation, which can improve sample efficiency and robustness using active learning and risk-averse reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T20:13:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.