Related papers: Envisioning a Human-AI collaborative system to transform policies into decision models

Envisioning a Human-AI collaborative system to transform policies into decision models

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.06882v1
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 18:29:48 GMT
Title: Envisioning a Human-AI collaborative system to transform policies into decision models
Authors: Vanessa Lopez, Gabriele Picco, Inge Vejsbjerg, Thanh Lam Hoang, Yufang Hou, Marco Luca Sbodio, John Segrave-Daly, Denisa Moga, Sean Swords, Miao Wei and Eoin Carroll
Abstract summary: We explore the enormous potential of AI to assist government agencies and policy experts in scaling the production of both human-readable and machine executable policy rules. We present an initial emerging approach to shorten the route from policy documents to executable, interpretable and standardised decision models using AI, NLP and Knowledge Graphs. Despite the many open domain challenges, in this position paper we explore the enormous potential of AI to assist government agencies and policy experts in scaling the production of both human-readable and machine executable policy rules.
Score: 7.9231719294492065
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: Regulations govern many aspects of citizens' daily lives. Governments and businesses routinely automate these in the form of coded rules (e.g., to check a citizen's eligibility for specific benefits). However, the path to automation is long and challenging. To address this, recent global initiatives for digital government, proposing to simultaneously express policy in natural language for human consumption as well as computationally amenable rules or code, are gathering broad public-sector interest. We introduce the problem of semi-automatically building decision models from eligibility policies for social services, and present an initial emerging approach to shorten the route from policy documents to executable, interpretable and standardised decision models using AI, NLP and Knowledge Graphs. Despite the many open domain challenges, in this position paper we explore the enormous potential of AI to assist government agencies and policy experts in scaling the production of both human-readable and machine executable policy rules, while improving transparency, interpretability, traceability and accountability of the decision making.

Related papers

Generative AI Needs Adaptive Governance [0.0]
generative AI challenges the notions of governance, trust, and human agency. This paper argues that generative AI calls for adaptive governance. We outline actors, roles, as well as both shared and actors-specific policy activities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T23:47:14Z)
Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence [51.967584623262674]
Governments and companies have started to leverage compute as a means to govern AI. compute-based policies and technologies have the potential to assist in these areas, but there is significant variation in their readiness for implementation. naive or poorly scoped approaches to compute governance carry significant risks in areas like privacy, economic impacts, and centralization of power.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-13T21:10:21Z)
Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage. Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4. This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z)
Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Humans through Public Policy [0.0]
This essay outlines research on AI that learn structures in policy data that can be leveraged for downstream tasks. We believe this represents the "comprehension" phase of AI and policy, but leveraging policy as a key source of human values to align AI requires "understanding" policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-25T21:31:14Z)
Think About the Stakeholders First! Towards an Algorithmic Transparency Playbook for Regulatory Compliance [14.043062659347427]
Laws are being proposed and passed by governments around the world to regulate Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems implemented into the public and private sectors. Many of these regulations address the transparency of AI systems, and related citizen-aware issues like allowing individuals to have the right to an explanation about how an AI system makes a decision that impacts them. We propose a novel stakeholder-first approach that assists technologists in designing transparent, regulatory compliant systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-10T09:39:00Z)
Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
Beyond Ads: Sequential Decision-Making Algorithms in Law and Public Policy [2.762239258559568]
We explore the promises and challenges of employing sequential decision-making algorithms in law and public policy. Our main thesis is that law and public policy pose distinct methodological challenges that the machine learning community has not yet addressed. We discuss a wide range of potential applications of sequential decision-making algorithms in regulation and governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-13T17:45:21Z)
Building a Foundation for Data-Driven, Interpretable, and Robust Policy Design using the AI Economist [67.08543240320756]
We show that the AI Economist framework enables effective, flexible, and interpretable policy design using two-level reinforcement learning and data-driven simulations. We find that log-linear policies trained using RL significantly improve social welfare, based on both public health and economic outcomes, compared to past outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-06T01:30:41Z)
An Automatic Attribute Based Access Control Policy Extraction from Access Logs [5.142415132534397]
An attribute-based access control (ABAC) model provides a more flexible approach for addressing the authorization needs of complex and dynamic systems. We present a methodology for automatically learning ABAC policy rules from access logs of a system to simplify the policy development process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-16T15:08:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.