Navigating the reporting guideline environment for computational pathology: A review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.09985v1
• Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 23:17:51 GMT
• Title: Navigating the reporting guideline environment for computational pathology: A review
• Authors: Clare McGenity, Darren Treanor
• Abstract summary: The aim of this work is to highlight resources and reporting guidelines available to researchers working in computational pathology. Items were compiled to create a summary for easy identification of useful resources and guidance. Over 70 published resources applicable to pathology AI research were identified.
• Score: 0.685316573653194
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The application of new artificial intelligence (AI) discoveries is transforming healthcare research. However, the standards of reporting are variable in this still evolving field, leading to potential research waste. The aim of this work is to highlight resources and reporting guidelines available to researchers working in computational pathology. The EQUATOR Network library of reporting guidelines and extensions was systematically searched up to August 2022 to identify applicable resources. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used and guidance was screened for utility at different stages of research and for a range of study types. Items were compiled to create a summary for easy identification of useful resources and guidance. Over 70 published resources applicable to pathology AI research were identified. Guidelines were divided into key categories, reflecting current study types and target areas for AI research: Literature & Research Priorities, Discovery, Clinical Trial, Implementation and Post-Implementation & Guidelines. Guidelines useful at multiple stages of research and those currently in development were also highlighted. Summary tables with links to guidelines for these groups were developed, to assist those working in cancer AI research with complete reporting of research. Issues with replication and research waste are recognised problems in AI research. Reporting guidelines can be used as templates to ensure the essential information needed to replicate research is included within journal articles and abstracts. Reporting guidelines are available and useful for many study types, but greater awareness is needed to encourage researchers to utilise them and for journals to adopt them. This review and summary of resources highlights guidance to researchers, aiming to improve completeness of reporting.

Related papers

• How Mature is Requirements Engineering for AI-based Systems? A Systematic Mapping Study on Practices, Challenges, and Future Research Directions [5.6818729232602205]
  It is unclear if existing RE methods are sufficient or if new ones are needed to address these challenges. Existing RE4AI research focuses mainly on requirements analysis and elicitation, with most practices applied in these areas. We identified requirements specification, explainability, and the gap between machine learning engineers and end-users as the most prevalent challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T11:28:16Z)
• Diagnostic Reasoning in Natural Language: Computational Model and Application [68.47402386668846]
  We investigate diagnostic abductive reasoning (DAR) in the context of language-grounded tasks (NL-DAR) We propose a novel modeling framework for NL-DAR based on Pearl's structural causal models. We use the resulting dataset to investigate the human decision-making process in NL-DAR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T06:55:37Z)
• Generative AI in Evidence-Based Software Engineering: A White Paper [10.489725182789885]
  In less than a year practitioners and researchers witnessed a rapid and wide implementation of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Textual GAIs capabilities enable researchers worldwide to explore new generative scenarios simplifying and hastening all timeconsuming text generation and analysis tasks. Based on our current investigation we will follow up the vision with the creation and empirical validation of a comprehensive suite of models to effectively support EBSE researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T17:16:17Z)
• A Survey Forest Diagram : Gain a Divergent Insight View on a Specific Research Topic [2.699900017799093]
  The use of Generative AI for information retrieval and question-answering has become popular for conducting research surveys. This study aims to develop an in-depth Survey Forest Diagram that guides novice researchers in divergent thinking about the research topic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T08:17:37Z)
• SurveyAgent: A Conversational System for Personalized and Efficient Research Survey [50.04283471107001]
  This paper introduces SurveyAgent, a novel conversational system designed to provide personalized and efficient research survey assistance to researchers. SurveyAgent integrates three key modules: Knowledge Management for organizing papers, Recommendation for discovering relevant literature, and Query Answering for engaging with content on a deeper level. Our evaluation demonstrates SurveyAgent's effectiveness in streamlining research activities, showcasing its capability to facilitate how researchers interact with scientific literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T15:01:51Z)
• The Efficiency Spectrum of Large Language Models: An Algorithmic Survey [54.19942426544731]
  The rapid growth of Large Language Models (LLMs) has been a driving force in transforming various domains. This paper examines the multi-faceted dimensions of efficiency essential for the end-to-end algorithmic development of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T16:00:25Z)
• De-identification of clinical free text using natural language processing: A systematic review of current approaches [48.343430343213896]
  Natural language processing has repeatedly demonstrated its feasibility in automating the de-identification process. Our study aims to provide systematic evidence on how the de-identification of clinical free text has evolved in the last thirteen years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T13:20:41Z)
• Reasoning with Language Model Prompting: A Survey [86.96133788869092]
  Reasoning, as an essential ability for complex problem-solving, can provide back-end support for various real-world applications. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of cutting-edge research on reasoning with language model prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T16:32:42Z)
• Research Trends and Applications of Data Augmentation Algorithms [77.34726150561087]
  We identify the main areas of application of data augmentation algorithms, the types of algorithms used, significant research trends, their progression over time and research gaps in data augmentation literature. We expect readers to understand the potential of data augmentation, as well as identify future research directions and open questions within data augmentation research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T11:38:32Z)
• Knowledge Graph Induction enabling Recommending and Trend Analysis: A Corporate Research Community Use Case [11.907821975089064]
  We present a use case of how a corporate research community, IBM Research, utilizes Semantic Web technologies to induce a unified Knowledge Graph. We identify a set of common patterns for exploiting the induced knowledge and exposed them as APIs. Those patterns were born out of user research which identified the most valuable use cases or user pain points to be alleviated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-11T20:51:28Z)
• A Comprehensive Attempt to Research Statement Generation [39.8491923428562]
  We propose the research statement generation task which aims to summarize one's research achievements. We construct an RSG dataset with 62 research statements and the corresponding 1,203 publications. Our method outperforms all the baselines with better content coverage and coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-25T03:57:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.