Generative AI in Evidence-Based Software Engineering: A White Paper

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17440v3
• Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:11:24 GMT
• Title: Generative AI in Evidence-Based Software Engineering: A White Paper
• Authors: Matteo Esposito, Andrea Janes, Davide Taibi, Valentina Lenarduzzi,
• Abstract summary: In less than a year practitioners and researchers witnessed a rapid and wide implementation of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Textual GAIs capabilities enable researchers worldwide to explore new generative scenarios simplifying and hastening all timeconsuming text generation and analysis tasks. Based on our current investigation we will follow up the vision with the creation and empirical validation of a comprehensive suite of models to effectively support EBSE researchers.
• Score: 10.489725182789885
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Context. In less than a year practitioners and researchers witnessed a rapid and wide implementation of Generative Artificial Intelligence. The daily availability of new models proposed by practitioners and researchers has enabled quick adoption. Textual GAIs capabilities enable researchers worldwide to explore new generative scenarios simplifying and hastening all timeconsuming text generation and analysis tasks. Motivation. The exponentially growing number of publications in our field with the increased accessibility to information due to digital libraries makes conducting systematic literature reviews and mapping studies an effort and timeinsensitive task Stemmed from this challenge we investigated and envisioned the role of GAIs in evidencebased software engineering. Future Directions. Based on our current investigation we will follow up the vision with the creation and empirical validation of a comprehensive suite of models to effectively support EBSE researchers

Related papers

• O1 Replication Journey: A Strategic Progress Report -- Part 1 [52.062216849476776]
  This paper introduces a pioneering approach to artificial intelligence research, embodied in our O1 Replication Journey. Our methodology addresses critical challenges in modern AI research, including the insularity of prolonged team-based projects. We propose the journey learning paradigm, which encourages models to learn not just shortcuts, but the complete exploration process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T15:13:01Z)
• Recent Advances in Generative AI and Large Language Models: Current Status, Challenges, and Perspectives [10.16399860867284]
  The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) has marked a new era of Natural Language Processing (NLP) This paper explores the current state of these cutting-edge technologies, demonstrating their remarkable advancements and wide-ranging applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T18:48:35Z)
• SurveyAgent: A Conversational System for Personalized and Efficient Research Survey [50.04283471107001]
  This paper introduces SurveyAgent, a novel conversational system designed to provide personalized and efficient research survey assistance to researchers. SurveyAgent integrates three key modules: Knowledge Management for organizing papers, Recommendation for discovering relevant literature, and Query Answering for engaging with content on a deeper level. Our evaluation demonstrates SurveyAgent's effectiveness in streamlining research activities, showcasing its capability to facilitate how researchers interact with scientific literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T15:01:51Z)
• A Survey of Neural Code Intelligence: Paradigms, Advances and Beyond [84.95530356322621]
  This survey presents a systematic review of the advancements in code intelligence. It covers over 50 representative models and their variants, more than 20 categories of tasks, and an extensive coverage of over 680 related works. Building on our examination of the developmental trajectories, we further investigate the emerging synergies between code intelligence and broader machine intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T08:54:56Z)
• Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature [0.0]
  We present a survey of AI techniques proposed in the last 15 years to help researchers conduct systematic analyses of scientific literature. We describe the tasks currently supported, the types of algorithms applied, and available tools proposed in 34 primary studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T19:12:49Z)
• Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Survey [89.71273968283616]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in text understanding and generation. We present an extensive overview by categorizing these works in terms of various IE subtasks and techniques. We empirically analyze the most advanced methods and discover the emerging trend of IE tasks with LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-29T14:25:22Z)
• Detection of Fake Generated Scientific Abstracts [0.9525711971667679]
  The academic community has expressed concerns regarding the difficulty of discriminating between what is real and what is artificially generated. In this study, we utilize the GPT-3 model to generate scientific paper abstracts through Artificial Intelligence. We explore various text representation methods when combined with Machine Learning models with the aim of identifying machine-written text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-12T20:20:22Z)
• The Semantic Reader Project: Augmenting Scholarly Documents through AI-Powered Interactive Reading Interfaces [54.2590226904332]
  We describe the Semantic Reader Project, a effort across multiple institutions to explore automatic creation of dynamic reading interfaces for research papers. Ten prototype interfaces have been developed and more than 300 participants and real-world users have shown improved reading experiences. We structure this paper around challenges scholars and the public face when reading research papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T02:47:09Z)
• Automated Mining of Leaderboards for Empirical AI Research [0.0]
  This study presents a comprehensive approach for generating Leaderboards for knowledge-graph-based scholarly information organization. Specifically, we investigate the problem of automated Leaderboard construction using state-of-the-art transformer models, viz. Bert, SciBert, and XLNet. As a result, a vast share of empirical AI research can be organized in the next-generation digital libraries as knowledge graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-31T10:00:52Z)
• A Survey of Knowledge Tracing: Models, Variants, and Applications [70.69281873057619]
  Knowledge Tracing is one of the fundamental tasks for student behavioral data analysis. We present three types of fundamental KT models with distinct technical routes. We discuss potential directions for future research in this rapidly growing field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-06T13:05:55Z)
• Generating Knowledge Graphs by Employing Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Techniques within the Scholarly Domain [1.9004296236396943]
  We present a new architecture that takes advantage of Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning methods for extracting entities and relationships from research publications. Within this research work, we i) tackle the challenge of knowledge extraction by employing several state-of-the-art Natural Language Processing and Text Mining tools. We generated a scientific knowledge graph including 109,105 triples, extracted from 26,827 abstracts of papers within the Semantic Web domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-28T08:31:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.