Information Governance as a Socio-Technical Process in the Development of Trustworthy Healthcare AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10007v1
• Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 10:21:46 GMT
• Title: Information Governance as a Socio-Technical Process in the Development of Trustworthy Healthcare AI
• Authors: Nigel Rees, Kelly Holding, Mark Sujan
• Abstract summary: Information Governance (IG) processes govern the use of personal confidential data. Legal basis for data sharing is explicit only for the purpose of delivering patient care. IG work should start early in the design life cycle and will likely continue throughout.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In order to develop trustworthy healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) prospective and ergonomics studies that consider the complexity and reality of real-world applications of AI systems are needed. To achieve this, technology developers and deploying organisations need to form collaborative partnerships. This entails access to healthcare data, which frequently might also include potentially identifiable data such as audio recordings of calls made to an ambulance service call centre. Information Governance (IG) processes have been put in place to govern the use of personal confidential data. However, navigating IG processes in the formative stages of AI development and pre-deployment can be challenging, because the legal basis for data sharing is explicit only for the purpose of delivering patient care, i.e., once a system is put into service. In this paper we describe our experiences of managing IG for the assurance of healthcare AI, using the example of an out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest recognition software within the context of the Welsh Ambulance Service. We frame IG as a socio-technical process. IG processes for the development of trustworthy healthcare AI rely on information governance work, which entails dialogue, negotiation, and trade-offs around the legal basis for data sharing, data requirements and data control. Information governance work should start early in the design life cycle and will likely continue throughout. This includes a focus on establishing and building relationships, as well as a focus on organisational readiness deeper understanding of both AI technologies as well as their safety assurance requirements.

Related papers

• Governing Through the Cloud: The Intermediary Role of Compute Providers in AI Regulation [14.704747149179047]
  We argue that compute providers should have legal obligations and ethical responsibilities associated with AI development and deployment. Compute providers can play an essential role in a regulatory ecosystem via four key capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T13:08:16Z)
• FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare [73.78776682247187]
  Concerns have been raised about the technical, clinical, ethical and legal risks associated with medical AI. This work describes the FUTURE-AI guideline as the first international consensus framework for guiding the development and deployment of trustworthy AI tools in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T10:49:05Z)
• Organizational Governance of Emerging Technologies: AI Adoption in Healthcare [43.02293389682218]
  The Health AI Partnership aims to better define the requirements for adequate organizational governance of AI systems in healthcare settings. This is one of the most detailed qualitative analyses to date of the current governance structures and processes involved in AI adoption by health systems in the United States. We hope these findings can inform future efforts to build capabilities to promote the safe, effective, and responsible adoption of emerging technologies in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T18:30:47Z)
• The Design and Implementation of a National AI Platform for Public Healthcare in Italy: Implications for Semantics and Interoperability [62.997667081978825]
  The Italian National Health Service is adopting Artificial Intelligence through its technical agencies. Such a vast programme requires special care in formalising the knowledge domain. Questions have been raised about the impact that AI could have on patients, practitioners, and health systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T08:00:02Z)
• MedPerf: Open Benchmarking Platform for Medical Artificial Intelligence using Federated Evaluation [110.31526448744096]
  We argue that unlocking this potential requires a systematic way to measure the performance of medical AI models on large-scale heterogeneous data. We are building MedPerf, an open framework for benchmarking machine learning in the medical domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T18:09:41Z)
• Towards Compliant Data Management Systems for Healthcare ML [6.057289837472806]
  We review how data flows within machine learning projects in healthcare from source to storage to use in training algorithms and beyond. Our objective is to design tools to detect and track sensitive data across machines and users across the life cycle of a project. We build a prototype of the solution that demonstrates the difficulties in this domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-15T15:27:51Z)
• Trustworthy AI Inference Systems: An Industry Research View [58.000323504158054]
  We provide an industry research view for approaching the design, deployment, and operation of trustworthy AI inference systems. We highlight opportunities and challenges in AI systems using trusted execution environments. We outline areas of further development that require the global collective attention of industry, academia, and government researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T23:05:55Z)
• Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims [59.64274607533249]
  AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable. This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems. We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)
• From Bit To Bedside: A Practical Framework For Artificial Intelligence Product Development In Healthcare [0.0]
  We present a decision perspective framework, for the development of AI-driven biomedical products. We focus on issues related to Clinical validation, Regulatory affairs, Data strategy and Algorithmic development. Our framework should be seen as a template for innovation frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-23T14:42:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.