Contextual Causal Bayesian Optimisation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.12412v1
• Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 10:36:10 GMT
• Title: Contextual Causal Bayesian Optimisation
• Authors: Vahan Arsenyan, Antoine Grosnit, Haitham Bou-Ammar
• Abstract summary: We show that, in general, utilising a subset of observational variables as a context to choose the values of interventional variables leads to lower cumulative regrets. We propose a general framework of contextual causal Bayesian optimisation that efficiently searches through combinations of controlled and contextual variables. We analytically show that well-established methods, such as contextual BO (CoBO) or CaBO, are not able to achieve the optimum in some cases.
• Score: 3.649440235324259
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Causal Bayesian optimisation (CaBO) combines causality with Bayesian optimisation (BO) and shows that there are situations where the optimal reward is not achievable if causal knowledge is ignored. While CaBO exploits causal relations to determine the set of controllable variables to intervene on, it does not exploit purely observational variables and marginalises them. We show that, in general, utilising a subset of observational variables as a context to choose the values of interventional variables leads to lower cumulative regrets. We propose a general framework of contextual causal Bayesian optimisation that efficiently searches through combinations of controlled and contextual variables, known as policy scopes, and identifies the one yielding the optimum. We highlight the difficulties arising from the application of the causal acquisition function currently used in CaBO to select the policy scope in contextual settings and propose a multi-armed bandits based selection mechanism. We analytically show that well-established methods, such as contextual BO (CoBO) or CaBO, are not able to achieve the optimum in some cases, and empirically show that the proposed method achieves sub-linear regret in various environments and under different configurations.

Related papers

• Multi-Objective Causal Bayesian Optimization [2.5311562666866494]
  We propose Multi-Objective Causal Bayesian Optimization (MO-CBO) to identify optimal interventions within a known multi-target causal graph. We show that MO-CBO can be decomposed into several traditional multi-objective optimization tasks. The proposed method will be validated on both synthetic and real-world causal graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T17:26:16Z)
• Indiscriminate Disruption of Conditional Inference on Multivariate Gaussians [60.22542847840578]
  Despite advances in adversarial machine learning, inference for Gaussian models in the presence of an adversary is notably understudied. We consider a self-interested attacker who wishes to disrupt a decisionmaker's conditional inference and subsequent actions by corrupting a set of evidentiary variables. To avoid detection, the attacker also desires the attack to appear plausible wherein plausibility is determined by the density of the corrupted evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T17:46:55Z)
• Optimal Baseline Corrections for Off-Policy Contextual Bandits [61.740094604552475]
  We aim to learn decision policies that optimize an unbiased offline estimate of an online reward metric. We propose a single framework built on their equivalence in learning scenarios. Our framework enables us to characterize the variance-optimal unbiased estimator and provide a closed-form solution for it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T12:52:22Z)
• Risk-Controlling Model Selection via Guided Bayesian Optimization [35.53469358591976]
  We find a configuration that adheres to user-specified limits on certain risks while being useful with respect to other conflicting metrics. Our method identifies a set of optimal configurations residing in a designated region of interest. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on a range of tasks with multiple desiderata, including low error rates, equitable predictions, handling spurious correlations, managing rate and distortion in generative models, and reducing computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T07:29:44Z)
• Likelihood Ratio Confidence Sets for Sequential Decision Making [51.66638486226482]
  We revisit the likelihood-based inference principle and propose to use likelihood ratios to construct valid confidence sequences. Our method is especially suitable for problems with well-specified likelihoods. We show how to provably choose the best sequence of estimators and shed light on connections to online convex optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T00:10:21Z)
• Model-based Causal Bayesian Optimization [74.78486244786083]
  We introduce the first algorithm for Causal Bayesian Optimization with Multiplicative Weights (CBO-MW) We derive regret bounds for CBO-MW that naturally depend on graph-related quantities. Our experiments include a realistic demonstration of how CBO-MW can be used to learn users' demand patterns in a shared mobility system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T13:02:36Z)
• Learning Relevant Contextual Variables Within Bayesian Optimization [17.18588266529801]
  We propose a Sensitivity-Analysis-Driven Contextual BO (SADCBO) method against alternatives on both synthetic and real-world experiments. We learn the relevance of contextual variables by sensitivity analysis of the posterior surrogate model. We empirically evaluate our proposed Sensitivity-Analysis-Driven Contextual BO (SADCBO) method against alternatives on both synthetic and real-world experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T14:45:03Z)
• Model-based Causal Bayesian Optimization [78.120734120667]
  We propose model-based causal Bayesian optimization (MCBO) MCBO learns a full system model instead of only modeling intervention-reward pairs. Unlike in standard Bayesian optimization, our acquisition function cannot be evaluated in closed form.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T14:28:21Z)
• Bayesian Optimization with Conformal Prediction Sets [44.565812181545645]
  Conformal prediction is an uncertainty quantification method with coverage guarantees even for misspecified models. We propose conformal Bayesian optimization, which directs queries towards regions of search space where the model predictions have guaranteed validity. In many cases we find that query coverage can be significantly improved without harming sample-efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T17:01:05Z)
• Generalizing Bayesian Optimization with Decision-theoretic Entropies [102.82152945324381]
  We consider a generalization of Shannon entropy from work in statistical decision theory. We first show that special cases of this entropy lead to popular acquisition functions used in BO procedures. We then show how alternative choices for the loss yield a flexible family of acquisition functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T04:43:58Z)
• Continuous Mean-Covariance Bandits [39.820490484375156]
  We propose a novel Continuous Mean-Covariance Bandit model to take into account option correlation. In CMCB, there is a learner who sequentially chooses weight vectors on given options and observes random feedback according to the decisions. We propose novel algorithms with optimal regrets (within logarithmic factors) and provide matching lower bounds to validate their optimalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-24T06:37:05Z)
• Causal Bayesian Optimization [8.958125394444679]
  We study the problem of globally optimizing a variable of interest that is part of a causal model in which a sequence of interventions can be performed. Our approach combines ideas from causal inference, uncertainty quantification and sequential decision making. We show how knowing the causal graph significantly improves the ability to reason about optimal decision making strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-24T13:20:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.