Team Plan Recognition: A Review of the State of the Art

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13288v1
• Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 21:01:14 GMT
• Title: Team Plan Recognition: A Review of the State of the Art
• Authors: Loren Rieffer-Champlin
• Abstract summary: There is an increasing need to develop artificial intelligence systems that assist groups of humans working on coordinated tasks. This article reviews the literature on team plan recognition and surveys the most recent logic-based approaches for implementing it.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: There is an increasing need to develop artificial intelligence systems that assist groups of humans working on coordinated tasks. These systems must recognize and understand the plans and relationships between actions for a team of humans working toward a common objective. This article reviews the literature on team plan recognition and surveys the most recent logic-based approaches for implementing it. First, we provide some background knowledge, including a general definition of plan recognition in a team setting and a discussion of implementation challenges. Next, we explain our reasoning for focusing on logic-based methods. Finally, we survey recent approaches from two primary classes of logic-based methods (plan library-based and domain theory-based). We aim to bring more attention to this sparse but vital topic and inspire new directions for implementing team plan recognition.

Related papers

• Large Language Models for Planning: A Comprehensive and Systematic Survey [29.168219253281453]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance on certain planning tasks.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive review of LLM-based planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T08:44:53Z)
• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making. With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems. We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• A Desideratum for Conversational Agents: Capabilities, Challenges, and Future Directions [51.96890647837277]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have propelled conversational AI from traditional dialogue systems into sophisticated agents capable of autonomous actions, contextual awareness, and multi-turn interactions with users. This survey paper presents a desideratum for next-generation Conversational Agents - what has been achieved, what challenges persist, and what must be done for more scalable systems that approach human-level intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T21:01:25Z)
• DHP: Discrete Hierarchical Planning for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning Agents [2.1438108757511958]
  Our key contribution is a Discrete Hierarchical Planning (DHP) method, an alternative to traditional distance-based approaches. We provide theoretical foundations for the method and demonstrate its effectiveness through extensive empirical evaluations. We evaluate our method on long-horizon visual planning tasks in a 25-room environment, where it significantly outperforms previous benchmarks at success rate and average episode length.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T03:05:55Z)
• Introduction to AI Planning [0.0]
  The notes begin by introducing the state model and move on to exploring classical planning. The most extensive section is dedicated to Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning. The lecture notes end with a bonus chapter on the Planning Domain Definition (PDDL) Language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T10:38:04Z)
• Domain Adaptation in Intent Classification Systems: A Review [24.783606027583474]
  Dialogue agents, which perform specific tasks, are part of the long-term goal of NLP researchers to build intelligent agents that communicate with humans in natural language. We conduct a thorough technical review of the datasets, domains, tasks, and methods needed to train the intent classification part of dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T15:59:05Z)
• Learning adaptive planning representations with natural language guidance [90.24449752926866]
  This paper describes Ada, a framework for automatically constructing task-specific planning representations. Ada interactively learns a library of planner-compatible high-level action abstractions and low-level controllers adapted to a particular domain of planning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T23:35:31Z)
• Towards Goal-oriented Intelligent Tutoring Systems in Online Education [69.06930979754627]
  We propose a new task, named Goal-oriented Intelligent Tutoring Systems (GITS) GITS aims to enable the student's mastery of a designated concept by strategically planning a customized sequence of exercises and assessment. We propose a novel graph-based reinforcement learning framework, named Planning-Assessment-Interaction (PAI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T12:37:16Z)
• Planning as In-Painting: A Diffusion-Based Embodied Task Planning Framework for Environments under Uncertainty [56.30846158280031]
  Task planning for embodied AI has been one of the most challenging problems. We propose a task-agnostic method named 'planning as in-painting' The proposed framework achieves promising performances in various embodied AI tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-02T10:07:17Z)
• A Planning Ontology to Represent and Exploit Planning Knowledge for Performance Efficiency [6.87593454486392]
  We consider the problem of automated planning, where the objective is to find a sequence of actions that will move an agent from an initial state of the world to a desired goal state. We hypothesize that given a large number of available planners and diverse planning domains; they carry essential information that can be leveraged to identify suitable planners and improve their performance for a domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T14:51:07Z)
• Learning to Reason over Scene Graphs: A Case Study of Finetuning GPT-2 into a Robot Language Model for Grounded Task Planning [45.51792981370957]
  We investigate the applicability of a smaller class of large language models (LLMs) in robotic task planning by learning to decompose tasks into subgoal specifications for a planner to execute sequentially. Our method grounds the input of the LLM on the domain that is represented as a scene graph, enabling it to translate human requests into executable robot plans. Our findings suggest that the knowledge stored in an LLM can be effectively grounded to perform long-horizon task planning, demonstrating the promising potential for the future application of neuro-symbolic planning methods in robotics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T18:14:32Z)
• Planning and Learning: Path-Planning for Autonomous Vehicles, a Review of the Literature [5.015229992316947]
  This short review aims to make the reader familiar with state-of-the-art works relating to planning, scheduling and learning. First, we study state-of-the-art planning algorithms. Then we explore in more detail graph neural networks, a recent variant of neural networks suited for processing graph-structured inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-26T20:56:18Z)
• Long-Horizon Planning and Execution with Functional Object-Oriented Networks [79.94575713911189]
  We introduce the idea of exploiting object-level knowledge as a FOON for task planning and execution. Our approach automatically transforms FOON into PDDL and leverages off-the-shelf planners, action contexts, and robot skills. We demonstrate our approach on long-horizon tasks in CoppeliaSim and show how learned action contexts can be extended to never-before-seen scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-12T19:29:35Z)
• Neuro-Symbolic Causal Language Planning with Commonsense Prompting [67.06667162430118]
  Language planning aims to implement complex high-level goals by decomposition into simpler low-level steps. Previous methods require either manual exemplars or annotated programs to acquire such ability from large language models. This paper proposes Neuro-Symbolic Causal Language Planner (CLAP) that elicits procedural knowledge from the LLMs with commonsense-infused prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T22:09:52Z)
• AR-LSAT: Investigating Analytical Reasoning of Text [57.1542673852013]
  We study the challenge of analytical reasoning of text and introduce a new dataset consisting of questions from the Law School Admission Test from 1991 to 2016. We analyze what knowledge understanding and reasoning abilities are required to do well on this task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T02:53:32Z)
• The Emerging Landscape of Explainable AI Planning and Decision Making [38.2760494588758]
  We provide a comprehensive outline of the different threads of work in Explainable AI Planning (XAIP) We hope that the survey will provide guidance to new researchers in automated planning towards the role of explanations in the effective design of human-in-the-loop systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-26T18:40:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.