Benchmarking Model Predictive Control Algorithms in Building Optimization Testing Framework (BOPTEST)

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13447v2
• Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:18:04 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking Model Predictive Control Algorithms in Building Optimization Testing Framework (BOPTEST)
• Authors: Saman Mostafavi, Chihyeon Song, Aayushman Sharma, Raman Goyal, Alejandro Brito,
• Abstract summary: We present a data-driven modeling and control framework for physics-based building emulators. Our approach consists of: (a) Offline training of differentiable surrogate models that accelerate model evaluations, provide cost-effective gradients, and maintain good predictive accuracy for the receding horizon in Model Predictive Control (MPC) We extensively evaluate the modeling and control performance using multiple surrogate models and optimization frameworks across various test cases available in the Building Optimization Testing Framework (BOPTEST)
• Score: 40.17692290400862
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present a data-driven modeling and control framework for physics-based building emulators. Our approach consists of: (a) Offline training of differentiable surrogate models that accelerate model evaluations, provide cost-effective gradients, and maintain good predictive accuracy for the receding horizon in Model Predictive Control (MPC), and (b) Formulating and solving nonlinear building HVAC MPC problems. We extensively evaluate the modeling and control performance using multiple surrogate models and optimization frameworks across various test cases available in the Building Optimization Testing Framework (BOPTEST). Our framework is compatible with other modeling techniques and can be customized with different control formulations, making it adaptable and future-proof for test cases currently under development for BOPTEST. This modularity provides a path towards prototyping predictive controllers in large buildings, ensuring scalability and robustness in real-world applications.

Related papers

• Towards Stable Machine Learning Model Retraining via Slowly Varying Sequences [6.067007470552307]
  We propose a methodology for finding sequences of machine learning models that are stable across retraining iterations. We develop a mixed-integer optimization formulation that is guaranteed to recover optimal models. Our method shows stronger stability than greedily trained models with a small, controllable sacrifice in predictive power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T22:45:38Z)
• Data-driven Nonlinear Model Reduction using Koopman Theory: Integrated Control Form and NMPC Case Study [56.283944756315066]
  We propose generic model structures combining delay-coordinate encoding of measurements and full-state decoding to integrate reduced Koopman modeling and state estimation. A case study demonstrates that our approach provides accurate control models and enables real-time capable nonlinear model predictive control of a high-purity cryogenic distillation column.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T11:54:54Z)
• Variational Exploration Module VEM: A Cloud-Native Optimization and Validation Tool for Geospatial Modeling and AI Workflows [0.0]
  Cloud-based deployments help to scale up these modeling and AI. We have developed the Variational Exploration Module which facilitates the optimization and validation of modeling deployed in the cloud. The flexibility and robustness of the model-agnostic module is demonstrated using real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-26T23:07:00Z)
• BEAR: Physics-Principled Building Environment for Control and Reinforcement Learning [9.66911049633598]
  "BEAR" is a physics-principled Building Environment for Control And Reinforcement Learning. It allows researchers to benchmark both model-based and model-free controllers using a broad collection of standard building models in Python without co-simulation using external building simulators. We demonstrate the compatibility and performance of BEAR with different controllers, including both model predictive control (MPC) and several state-of-the-art RL methods with two case studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-27T06:36:35Z)
• When to Update Your Model: Constrained Model-based Reinforcement Learning [50.74369835934703]
  We propose a novel and general theoretical scheme for a non-decreasing performance guarantee of model-based RL (MBRL) Our follow-up derived bounds reveal the relationship between model shifts and performance improvement. A further example demonstrates that learning models from a dynamically-varying number of explorations benefit the eventual returns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T17:57:43Z)
• Slimmable Domain Adaptation [112.19652651687402]
  We introduce a simple framework, Slimmable Domain Adaptation, to improve cross-domain generalization with a weight-sharing model bank. Our framework surpasses other competing approaches by a very large margin on multiple benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-14T06:28:04Z)
• A Nested Weighted Tchebycheff Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization Approach for Flexibility of Unknown Utopia Estimation in Expensive Black-box Design Problems [0.0]
  In existing work, a weighted Tchebycheff MOBO approach has been demonstrated which attempts to estimate the unknown utopia in formulating acquisition function. We propose a nested weighted Tchebycheff MOBO framework where we build a regression model selection procedure from an ensemble of models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-16T00:44:06Z)
• Evaluating model-based planning and planner amortization for continuous control [79.49319308600228]
  We take a hybrid approach, combining model predictive control (MPC) with a learned model and model-free policy learning. We find that well-tuned model-free agents are strong baselines even for high DoF control problems. We show that it is possible to distil a model-based planner into a policy that amortizes the planning without any loss of performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T12:00:40Z)
• Control as Hybrid Inference [62.997667081978825]
  We present an implementation of CHI which naturally mediates the balance between iterative and amortised inference. We verify the scalability of our algorithm on a continuous control benchmark, demonstrating that it outperforms strong model-free and model-based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-11T19:44:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.