Privacy Dashboards for Citizens and corresponding GDPR Services for Small Data Holders: A Literature Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00325v4
• Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:17:10 GMT
• Title: Privacy Dashboards for Citizens and corresponding GDPR Services for Small Data Holders: A Literature Review
• Authors: Nico Puhlmann, Alex Wiesmaier, Patrick Weber, Andreas Heinemann,
• Abstract summary: We present a literature review on solutions promising relief in the form of privacy dashboards for citizens and services for small data holders. This is ought to be a step towards both enabling citizens to exercise their rights and supporting small data holders to comply with their duties.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Citizens have gained many rights with the GDPR, e.g. the right to get a copy of their personal data. In practice, however, this is fraught with problems for citizens and small data holders. We present a literature review on solutions promising relief in the form of privacy dashboards for citizens and GDPR services for small data holders. Covered topics are analyzed, categorized and compared. This is ought to be a step towards both enabling citizens to exercise their GDPR rights and supporting small data holders to comply with their GDPR duties.

Related papers

• A BERT-based Empirical Study of Privacy Policies' Compliance with GDPR [9.676166100354282]
  This study aims to address challenge of compliance analysis between privacy policies for 5G networks. We manually collected privacy policies from almost 70 different MNOs and we utilized an automated BERT-based model for classification. In addition, we present first empirical evidence on the readability of privacy policies for 5G network. we adopted incorporates various established readability metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T11:47:52Z)
• GDPR: Is it worth it? Perceptions of workers who have experienced its implementation [1.9662978733004604]
  We investigate how cost and effort is viewed by workers and citizens. Participants recognise their rights when prompted but know little about their regulator. They have observed concrete changes to practices in their workplaces and appreciate trade-offs. The very people who consider it to be positive for their company consider it to be positive for privacy and not pointless bureaucratic regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T16:18:35Z)
• SoK: The Gap Between Data Rights Ideals and Reality [46.14715472341707]
  Do rights-based privacy laws effectively empower individuals over their data? This paper scrutinizes these approaches by reviewing empirical studies, news articles, and blog posts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T21:52:51Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• Algorithmic Fairness Datasets: the Story so Far [68.45921483094705]
  Data-driven algorithms are studied in diverse domains to support critical decisions, directly impacting people's well-being. A growing community of researchers has been investigating the equity of existing algorithms and proposing novel ones, advancing the understanding of risks and opportunities of automated decision-making for historically disadvantaged populations. Progress in fair Machine Learning hinges on data, which can be appropriately used only if adequately documented. Unfortunately, the algorithmic fairness community suffers from a collective data documentation debt caused by a lack of information on specific resources (opacity) and scatteredness of available information (sparsity)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T17:25:46Z)
• Automated Detection of GDPR Disclosure Requirements in Privacy Policies using Deep Active Learning [3.659023646021795]
  Most privacy policies are verbose, full of jargon, and vaguely describe companies' data practices and users' rights. In this paper, we create a privacy policy dataset of 1,080 websites labeled with the 18 requirements. We develop a Convolutional Network (CNN) based model which can classify the privacy policies with an accuracy of 89.2%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-08T01:28:27Z)
• "It may be a pain in the backside but..." Insights into the impact of GDPR on business after three years [2.5567566997688043]
  General Data Protection Regulation ( Ireland) came into effect in May. Aim of study is to investigate if is all pain and no gain for business. We find threat threat fines has focused corporate mind and made business more privacy aware. Many implementation challenges remain. New business development and intra-company communication is more constrained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T16:44:21Z)
• Decision Making with Differential Privacy under a Fairness Lens [65.16089054531395]
  The U.S. Census Bureau releases data sets and statistics about groups of individuals that are used as input to a number of critical decision processes. To conform to privacy and confidentiality requirements, these agencies are often required to release privacy-preserving versions of the data. This paper studies the release of differentially private data sets and analyzes their impact on some critical resource allocation tasks under a fairness perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-16T21:04:19Z)
• Second layer data governance for permissioned blockchains: the privacy management challenge [58.720142291102135]
  In pandemic situations, such as the COVID-19 and Ebola outbreak, the action related to sharing health data is crucial to avoid the massive infection and decrease the number of deaths. In this sense, permissioned blockchain technology emerges to empower users to get their rights providing data ownership, transparency, and security through an immutable, unified, and distributed database ruled by smart contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T13:19:38Z)
• GDPR: When the Right to Access Personal Data Becomes a Threat [63.732639864601914]
  We examine more than 300 data controllers performing for each of them a request to access personal data. We find that 50.4% of the data controllers that handled the request, have flaws in the procedure of identifying the users. With the undesired and surprising result that, in its present deployment, has actually decreased the privacy of the users of web services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T22:01:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.