Causal Effect Estimation: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00848v1
• Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 03:25:04 GMT
• Title: Causal Effect Estimation: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities
• Authors: Zhixuan Chu, Jianmin Huang, Ruopeng Li, Wei Chu, Sheng Li
• Abstract summary: Causal inference has numerous real-world applications in many domains, such as health care, marketing, political science, and online advertising. Treatment effect estimation, a fundamental problem in causal inference, has been extensively studied in statistics for decades.
• Score: 18.649420489201464
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Causal inference has numerous real-world applications in many domains, such as health care, marketing, political science, and online advertising. Treatment effect estimation, a fundamental problem in causal inference, has been extensively studied in statistics for decades. However, traditional treatment effect estimation methods may not well handle large-scale and high-dimensional heterogeneous data. In recent years, an emerging research direction has attracted increasing attention in the broad artificial intelligence field, which combines the advantages of traditional treatment effect estimation approaches (e.g., propensity score, matching, and reweighing) and advanced machine learning approaches (e.g., representation learning, adversarial learning, and graph neural networks). Although the advanced machine learning approaches have shown extraordinary performance in treatment effect estimation, it also comes with a lot of new topics and new research questions. In view of the latest research efforts in the causal inference field, we provide a comprehensive discussion of challenges and opportunities for the three core components of the treatment effect estimation task, i.e., treatment, covariates, and outcome. In addition, we showcase the promising research directions of this topic from multiple perspectives.

Related papers

• Reduced-Rank Multi-objective Policy Learning and Optimization [57.978477569678844]
  In practice, causal researchers do not have a single outcome in mind a priori. In government-assisted social benefit programs, policymakers collect many outcomes to understand the multidimensional nature of poverty. We present a data-driven dimensionality-reduction methodology for multiple outcomes in the context of optimal policy learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T08:16:30Z)
• The Blessings of Multiple Treatments and Outcomes in Treatment Effect Estimation [53.81860494566915]
  Existing studies leveraged proxy variables or multiple treatments to adjust for confounding bias. In many real-world scenarios, there is greater interest in studying the effects on multiple outcomes. We show that parallel studies of multiple outcomes involved in this setting can assist each other in causal identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T14:33:48Z)
• Continual Causal Effect Estimation: Challenges and Opportunities [11.343298687766579]
  A further understanding of cause and effect within observational data is critical across many domains. The existing methods mainly focus on source-specific and stationary observational data. In the era of big data, we face new challenges in causal inference with observational data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-03T09:57:50Z)
• Data-Driven Causal Effect Estimation Based on Graphical Causal Modelling: A Survey [30.115088044583953]
  We review data-driven methods on causal effect estimation using graphical causal modelling. We identify and discuss the challenges faced by data-driven causal effect estimation. We hope this review will motivate more researchers to design better data-driven methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-20T03:25:58Z)
• Data-Centric Epidemic Forecasting: A Survey [56.99209141838794]
  This survey delves into various data-driven methodological and practical advancements. We enumerate the large number of epidemiological datasets and novel data streams that are relevant to epidemic forecasting. We also discuss experiences and challenges that arise in real-world deployment of these forecasting systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T16:15:11Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• Estimating Individual Treatment Effects using Non-Parametric Regression Models: a Review [0.0]
  We introduce the setup and the issues related to conducting causal inference with observational or non-fully randomized data. We develop a unifying taxonomy of the existing state-of-the-art frameworks that allow for individual treatment effects estimation. We conclude by demonstrating the use of some of the methods on an empirical analysis of the school meal program data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-14T14:26:55Z)
• A Survey on Causal Inference [64.45536158710014]
  Causal inference is a critical research topic across many domains, such as statistics, computer science, education, public policy and economics. Various causal effect estimation methods for observational data have sprung up.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-05T21:35:29Z)
• Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
  We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication. We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance. We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.