All Real Projective Measurements Can be Self-tested
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00974v2
- Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2023 10:37:55 GMT
- Title: All Real Projective Measurements Can be Self-tested
- Authors: Ranyiliu Chen, Laura Man\v{c}inska, Jurij Vol\v{c}i\v{c}
- Abstract summary: We show that every real projective measurement can be self-tested.
We employ the idea that existing self-tests can be extended to verify additional untrusted measurements.
We develop a new technique of iterative self-testing, which involves using post-hoc self-testing in a sequential manner.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Self-testing is the strongest form of quantum functionality verification
which allows a classical user to deduce the quantum state and measurements used
to produce measurement statistics. While self-testing of quantum states is
well-understood, self-testing of measurements, especially in high dimensions,
has remained more elusive. We demonstrate the first general result in this
direction by showing that every real projective measurement can be self-tested.
The standard definition of self-testing only allows for the certification of
real measurements. Therefore, our work effectively broadens the scope of
self-testable projective measurements to their full potential. To reach this
result, we employ the idea that existing self-tests can be extended to verify
additional untrusted measurements. This is known as `post-hoc self-testing'. We
formalize the method of post-hoc self-testing and establish a sufficient
condition for its application. Using this condition we construct self-tests for
all real projective measurements. Inspired by our construction, we develop a
new technique of iterative self-testing, which involves using post-hoc
self-testing in a sequential manner. Starting from any established self-test,
we fully characterize the set of measurements that can be verified via
iterative self-testing. This provides a clear methodology for constructing new
self-tests from pre-existing ones.
Related papers
- Certifying classes of $d$-outcome measurements with quantum steering [49.1574468325115]
We provide a construction of a family of steering inequalities tailored to large classes of $d$-outcomes projective measurements.
We prove that the maximal quantum violation of those inequalities can be used for certification of those measurements and the maximally entangled state of two qudits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-27T15:32:53Z) - Precise Error Rates for Computationally Efficient Testing [75.63895690909241]
We revisit the question of simple-versus-simple hypothesis testing with an eye towards computational complexity.
An existing test based on linear spectral statistics achieves the best possible tradeoff curve between type I and type II error rates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-01T04:41:16Z) - A mathematical foundation for self-testing: Lifting common assumptions [0.0]
We study the phenomenon of self-testing from the first principles, aiming to place this versatile concept on a rigorous mathematical footing.
We identify a quantum correlation which is a self-test only if certain assumptions are made.
Remarkably, this is also the first example of a correlation that cannot be implemented using projective measurements on a bipartite state of full Schmidt rank.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T11:41:31Z) - Constant-sized self-tests for maximally entangled states and single projective measurements [0.0]
Self-testing is a powerful certification of quantum systems relying on measured, classical statistics.
This paper considers self-testing in bipartite Bell scenarios with small number of inputs and outputs, but with quantum states and measurements of arbitrarily large dimension.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-23T13:43:56Z) - Sequential Kernelized Independence Testing [101.22966794822084]
We design sequential kernelized independence tests inspired by kernelized dependence measures.
We demonstrate the power of our approaches on both simulated and real data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-14T18:08:42Z) - Self-testing of different entanglement resources via fixed measurement
settings [4.2168438426143595]
We show that a family of two-qubit entangled states can be self-tested by the same measurement settings.
Our results can be applied to various quantum information processing tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-23T12:14:51Z) - Quantum networks self-test all entangled states [0.0]
Certifying quantum properties with minimal assumptions is a fundamental problem in quantum information science.
We introduce a framework for network-assisted self-testing and use it to self-test any pure entangled quantum state of an arbitrary number of systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-13T15:38:12Z) - MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentation [131.28104376280197]
We study the problem of test time robustification, i.e., using the test input to improve model robustness.
Recent prior works have proposed methods for test time adaptation, however, they each introduce additional assumptions.
We propose a simple approach that can be used in any test setting where the model is probabilistic and adaptable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-18T17:55:11Z) - Sample-efficient device-independent quantum state verification and
certification [68.8204255655161]
Authentication of quantum sources is a crucial task in building reliable and efficient protocols for quantum-information processing.
We develop a systematic approach to device-independent verification of quantum states free of IID assumptions in the finite copy regime.
We show that device-independent verification can be performed with optimal sample efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-12T17:48:04Z) - On the optimal certification of von Neumann measurements [55.41644538483948]
certification of quantum measurements can be viewed as the extension of quantum hypotheses testing.
We show the connection between the certification of quantum channels or von Neumann measurements and the notion of $q$-numerical range.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-14T22:38:23Z) - A universal scheme for robust self-testing in the prepare-and-measure
scenario [0.0]
We consider the problem of certification of arbitrary ensembles of pure states and projective measurements.
We propose a universal and intuitive scheme based on establishing perfect correlations between target states and suitably-chosen projective measurements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-02T17:06:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.