Adapting to Continuous Covariate Shift via Online Density Ratio Estimation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02552v2
- Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 13:18:12 GMT
- Title: Adapting to Continuous Covariate Shift via Online Density Ratio Estimation
- Authors: Yu-Jie Zhang, Zhen-Yu Zhang, Peng Zhao, Masashi Sugiyama,
- Abstract summary: Dealing with distribution shifts is one of the central challenges for modern machine learning.
We propose an online method that can appropriately reuse historical information.
Our density ratio estimation method is proven to perform well by enjoying a dynamic regret bound.
- Score: 64.8027122329609
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Dealing with distribution shifts is one of the central challenges for modern machine learning. One fundamental situation is the covariate shift, where the input distributions of data change from training to testing stages while the input-conditional output distribution remains unchanged. In this paper, we initiate the study of a more challenging scenario -- continuous covariate shift -- in which the test data appear sequentially, and their distributions can shift continuously. Our goal is to adaptively train the predictor such that its prediction risk accumulated over time can be minimized. Starting with the importance-weighted learning, we show the method works effectively if the time-varying density ratios of test and train inputs can be accurately estimated. However, existing density ratio estimation methods would fail due to data scarcity at each time step. To this end, we propose an online method that can appropriately reuse historical information. Our density ratio estimation method is proven to perform well by enjoying a dynamic regret bound, which finally leads to an excess risk guarantee for the predictor. Empirical results also validate the effectiveness.
Related papers
- Robust Flow-based Conformal Inference (FCI) with Statistical Guarantee [4.821312633849745]
We develop a series of conformal inference methods, including building predictive sets and inferring outliers for complex and high-dimensional data.
We evaluate our method, robust flow-based conformal inference, on benchmark datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-22T04:17:30Z) - Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions.
In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data.
We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z) - Managing dataset shift by adversarial validation for credit scoring [5.560471251954645]
The inconsistency between the distribution of training data and the data that actually needs to be predicted is likely to cause poor model performance.
We propose a method based on adversarial validation to alleviate the dataset shift problem in credit scoring scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-19T07:07:15Z) - Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep
Learning [78.83598532168256]
Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties.
Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z) - Robust Correction of Sampling Bias Using Cumulative Distribution
Functions [19.551668880584973]
Varying domains and biased datasets can lead to differences between the training and the target distributions.
Current approaches for alleviating this often rely on estimating the ratio of training and target probability density functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-23T22:13:00Z) - Learning Calibrated Uncertainties for Domain Shift: A Distributionally
Robust Learning Approach [150.8920602230832]
We propose a framework for learning calibrated uncertainties under domain shifts.
In particular, the density ratio estimation reflects the closeness of a target (test) sample to the source (training) distribution.
We show that our proposed method generates calibrated uncertainties that benefit downstream tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-08T02:10:54Z) - DEMI: Discriminative Estimator of Mutual Information [5.248805627195347]
Estimating mutual information between continuous random variables is often intractable and challenging for high-dimensional data.
Recent progress has leveraged neural networks to optimize variational lower bounds on mutual information.
Our approach is based on training a classifier that provides the probability that a data sample pair is drawn from the joint distribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-05T04:19:27Z) - Robust Validation: Confident Predictions Even When Distributions Shift [19.327409270934474]
We describe procedures for robust predictive inference, where a model provides uncertainty estimates on its predictions rather than point predictions.
We present a method that produces prediction sets (almost exactly) giving the right coverage level for any test distribution in an $f$-divergence ball around the training population.
An essential component of our methodology is to estimate the amount of expected future data shift and build robustness to it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-10T17:09:16Z) - A One-step Approach to Covariate Shift Adaptation [82.01909503235385]
A default assumption in many machine learning scenarios is that the training and test samples are drawn from the same probability distribution.
We propose a novel one-step approach that jointly learns the predictive model and the associated weights in one optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-08T11:35:47Z) - Balance-Subsampled Stable Prediction [55.13512328954456]
We propose a novel balance-subsampled stable prediction (BSSP) algorithm based on the theory of fractional factorial design.
A design-theoretic analysis shows that the proposed method can reduce the confounding effects among predictors induced by the distribution shift.
Numerical experiments on both synthetic and real-world data sets demonstrate that our BSSP algorithm significantly outperforms the baseline methods for stable prediction across unknown test data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-08T07:01:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.