Generalization and Informativeness of Weighted Conformal Risk Control Under Covariate Shift

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11413v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 11:26:36 GMT
• Title: Generalization and Informativeness of Weighted Conformal Risk Control Under Covariate Shift
• Authors: Matteo Zecchin, Fredrik Hellström, Sangwoo Park, Shlomo Shamai, Osvaldo Simeone,
• Abstract summary: Weighted conformal risk control (W-CRC) uses data collected during the training phase to convert point predictions into prediction sets with valid risk guarantees at test time. While W-CRC provides statistical reliability, its efficiency -- measured by the size of the prediction sets -- can only be assessed at test time.
• Score: 40.43703709267958
• License:
• Abstract: Predictive models are often required to produce reliable predictions under statistical conditions that are not matched to the training data. A common type of training-testing mismatch is covariate shift, where the conditional distribution of the target variable given the input features remains fixed, while the marginal distribution of the inputs changes. Weighted conformal risk control (W-CRC) uses data collected during the training phase to convert point predictions into prediction sets with valid risk guarantees at test time despite the presence of a covariate shift. However, while W-CRC provides statistical reliability, its efficiency -- measured by the size of the prediction sets -- can only be assessed at test time. In this work, we relate the generalization properties of the base predictor to the efficiency of W-CRC under covariate shifts. Specifically, we derive a bound on the inefficiency of the W-CRC predictor that depends on algorithmic hyperparameters and task-specific quantities available at training time. This bound offers insights on relationships between the informativeness of the prediction sets, the extent of the covariate shift, and the size of the calibration and training sets. Experiments on fingerprinting-based localization validate the theoretical results.

Related papers

• Provably Reliable Conformal Prediction Sets in the Presence of Data Poisoning [53.42244686183879]
  Conformal prediction provides model-agnostic and distribution-free uncertainty quantification. Yet, conformal prediction is not reliable under poisoning attacks where adversaries manipulate both training and calibration data. We propose reliable prediction sets (RPS): the first efficient method for constructing conformal prediction sets with provable reliability guarantees under poisoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T15:37:11Z)
• Risk and cross validation in ridge regression with correlated samples [72.59731158970894]
  We provide training examples for the in- and out-of-sample risks of ridge regression when the data points have arbitrary correlations. We demonstrate that in this setting, the generalized cross validation estimator (GCV) fails to correctly predict the out-of-sample risk. We further extend our analysis to the case where the test point has nontrivial correlations with the training set, a setting often encountered in time series forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T17:27:29Z)
• Training-Conditional Coverage Bounds under Covariate Shift [2.3072402651280517]
  We study the training-conditional coverage properties of a range of conformal prediction methods. Results for the split conformal method are almost assumption-free, while the results for the full conformal and jackknife+ methods rely on strong assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T15:07:16Z)
• Domain-adaptive and Subgroup-specific Cascaded Temperature Regression for Out-of-distribution Calibration [16.930766717110053]
  We propose a novel meta-set-based cascaded temperature regression method for post-hoc calibration. We partition each meta-set into subgroups based on predicted category and confidence level, capturing diverse uncertainties. A regression network is then trained to derive category-specific and confidence-level-specific scaling, achieving calibration across meta-sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T14:35:57Z)
• Adapting to Continuous Covariate Shift via Online Density Ratio Estimation [64.8027122329609]
  Dealing with distribution shifts is one of the central challenges for modern machine learning. We propose an online method that can appropriately reuse historical information. Our density ratio estimation method is proven to perform well by enjoying a dynamic regret bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T04:03:33Z)
• A Learning Based Hypothesis Test for Harmful Covariate Shift [3.1406146587437904]
  Machine learning systems in high-risk domains need to identify when predictions should not be made on out-of-distribution test examples. In this work, we use the discordance between an ensemble of classifiers trained to agree on training data and disagree on test data to determine when a model should be removed from the deployment setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T04:15:24Z)
• Learning Calibrated Uncertainties for Domain Shift: A Distributionally Robust Learning Approach [150.8920602230832]
  We propose a framework for learning calibrated uncertainties under domain shifts. In particular, the density ratio estimation reflects the closeness of a target (test) sample to the source (training) distribution. We show that our proposed method generates calibrated uncertainties that benefit downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T02:10:54Z)
• Robust Validation: Confident Predictions Even When Distributions Shift [19.327409270934474]
  We describe procedures for robust predictive inference, where a model provides uncertainty estimates on its predictions rather than point predictions. We present a method that produces prediction sets (almost exactly) giving the right coverage level for any test distribution in an $f$-divergence ball around the training population. An essential component of our methodology is to estimate the amount of expected future data shift and build robustness to it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T17:09:16Z)
• Balance-Subsampled Stable Prediction [55.13512328954456]
  We propose a novel balance-subsampled stable prediction (BSSP) algorithm based on the theory of fractional factorial design. A design-theoretic analysis shows that the proposed method can reduce the confounding effects among predictors induced by the distribution shift. Numerical experiments on both synthetic and real-world data sets demonstrate that our BSSP algorithm significantly outperforms the baseline methods for stable prediction across unknown test data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T07:01:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.