What Do We Mean When We Talk about Trust in Social Media? A Systematic Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03671v1
• Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 18:45:43 GMT
• Title: What Do We Mean When We Talk about Trust in Social Media? A Systematic Review
• Abstract summary: Trust in social media is a complex concept, and there is conflicting evidence about the antecedents and implications of trusting social media content, users, and platforms. We conducted a systematic review to identify themes and challenges in this field. We contribute a synthesis of how trust in social media is defined, conceptualized, and measured, a summary of trust antecedents in social media, an understanding of how trust in social media impacts behaviors and attitudes, and directions for future work.
• Score: 18.634186284628694
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Do people trust social media? If so, why, in what contexts, and how does that trust impact their lives? Researchers, companies, and journalists alike have increasingly investigated these questions, which are fundamental to understanding social media interactions and their implications for society. However, trust in social media is a complex concept, and there is conflicting evidence about the antecedents and implications of trusting social media content, users, and platforms. More problematic is that we lack basic agreement as to what trust means in the context of social media. Addressing these challenges, we conducted a systematic review to identify themes and challenges in this field. Through our analysis of 70 papers, we contribute a synthesis of how trust in social media is defined, conceptualized, and measured, a summary of trust antecedents in social media, an understanding of how trust in social media impacts behaviors and attitudes, and directions for future work.

Related papers

• Trust as a Situated User State in Social LLM-Based Chatbots: A Longitudinal Study of Snapchat's My AI [0.0]
  Trust is shaped by perceived ability, conversational behavior, human-likeness, transparency, privacy concerns, and trust in the host platform.<n>Our findings show that trust is shaped by perceived ability, conversational behavior, human-likeness, transparency, privacy concerns, and trust in the host platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T10:22:41Z)
• SoMe: A Realistic Benchmark for LLM-based Social Media Agents [64.05026384906915]
  SoMe is a benchmark designed to evaluate social media agents equipped with various agent tools for accessing and analyzing social media data.<n>SoMe comprises a diverse collection of 8 social media agent tasks, 9,164,284 posts, 6,591 user profiles, and 25,686 reports from various social media platforms and external websites.<n>By extensive quantitative and qualitative analysis, we provide the first overview into the performance of mainstream agentic LLMs in realistic social media environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T08:36:09Z)
• Anti-establishment sentiment on TikTok: Implications for understanding influence(rs) and expertise on social media [3.2580463372881234]
  This study analyzes the prevalence of anti-establishment sentiment (AES) on the social media platform TikTok.<n>We find that AES is most prevalent in conspiracy theory content, and relatively rare in content related to the other two topics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T15:13:35Z)
• Community Moderation and the New Epistemology of Fact Checking on Social Media [124.26693978503339]
  Social media platforms have traditionally relied on independent fact-checking organizations to identify and flag misleading content.<n>X (formerly Twitter) and Meta have shifted towards community-driven content moderation by launching their own versions of crowd-sourced fact-checking.<n>We examine the current approaches to misinformation detection across major platforms, explore the emerging role of community-driven moderation, and critically evaluate both the promises and challenges of crowd-checking at scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T14:50:18Z)
• Trust and Friction: Negotiating How Information Flows Through Decentralized Social Media [1.1306212771477646]
  Decentralized social media protocols enable users in independent, user-hosted servers to interact with each other while they self-govern. This community-based model of social media governance opens up new opportunities for tailored decision-making about information flows. We conducted a semi-structured interview with 23 users of the Fediverse, a decentralized social media network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T00:29:32Z)
• Conceptualizing Trustworthiness and Trust in Communications [17.69113057959175]
  We present a novel holistic approach on how to tackle trustworthiness systematically in the context of communications. We propose a first attempt to incorporate objective system properties and subjective beliefs to establish trustworthiness-based trust, in particular in the context of the future Tactile Internet connecting robotic devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T06:11:13Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Trust and Believe -- Should We? Evaluating the Trustworthiness of Twitter Users [5.695742189917657]
  Fake news on social media is a major problem with far-reaching negative repercussions on both individuals and society. In this work, we create a model through which we hope to offer a solution that will instill trust in social network communities. Our model analyses the behaviour of 50,000 politicians on Twitter and assigns an influence score for each evaluated user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T06:57:19Z)
• Social media emotion macroscopes reflect emotional experiences in society at large [0.12656629989060433]
  Social media generate data on human behaviour at large scales and over long periods of time. Recent research has shown weak correlations between social media emotions and affect questionnaires at the individual level. No research has tested the validity of social media emotion macroscopes to track the temporal evolution of emotions at the level of a whole society.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T09:40:42Z)
• SOK: Seeing and Believing: Evaluating the Trustworthiness of Twitter Users [4.609388510200741]
  Currently, there is no automated way of determining which news or users are credible and which are not. In this work, we created a model which analysed the behaviour of50,000 politicians on Twitter. We classified the political Twitter users as either trusted or untrusted using random forest, multilayer perceptron, and support vector machine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-16T17:39:32Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Analysing Social Media Network Data with R: Semi-Automated Screening of Users, Comments and Communication Patterns [0.0]
  Communication on social media platforms is increasingly widespread across societies. Fake news, hate speech and radicalizing elements are part of this modern form of communication. A basic understanding of these mechanisms and communication patterns could help to counteract negative forms of communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-26T14:52:01Z)
• Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI [55.4046755826066]
  We discuss a model of trust inspired by, but not identical to, sociology's interpersonal trust (i.e., trust between people) We incorporate a formalization of 'contractual trust', such that trust between a user and an AI is trust that some implicit or explicit contract will hold. We discuss how to design trustworthy AI, how to evaluate whether trust has manifested, and whether it is warranted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T03:07:23Z)
• How Much Can We Really Trust You? Towards Simple, Interpretable Trust Quantification Metrics for Deep Neural Networks [94.65749466106664]
  We conduct a thought experiment and explore two key questions about trust in relation to confidence. We introduce a suite of metrics for assessing the overall trustworthiness of deep neural networks based on their behaviour when answering a set of questions. The proposed metrics are by no means perfect, but the hope is to push the conversation towards better metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-12T17:37:36Z)
• Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
  This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.