Toward a Theory of Causation for Interpreting Neural Code Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03788v5
• Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 01:36:14 GMT
• Title: Toward a Theory of Causation for Interpreting Neural Code Models
• Authors: David N. Palacio, Alejandro Velasco, Nathan Cooper, Alvaro Rodriguez, Kevin Moran, Denys Poshyvanyk,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces $do_code$, a post hoc interpretability method specific to Neural Code Models (NCMs) $do_code$ is based upon causal inference to enable language-oriented explanations. Results show that our studied NCMs are sensitive to changes in code syntax.
• Score: 49.906221295459275
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Neural Language Models of Code, or Neural Code Models (NCMs), are rapidly progressing from research prototypes to commercial developer tools. As such, understanding the capabilities and limitations of such models is becoming critical. However, the abilities of these models are typically measured using automated metrics that often only reveal a portion of their real-world performance. While, in general, the performance of NCMs appears promising, currently much is unknown about how such models arrive at decisions. To this end, this paper introduces $do_{code}$, a post hoc interpretability method specific to NCMs that is capable of explaining model predictions. $do_{code}$ is based upon causal inference to enable programming language-oriented explanations. While the theoretical underpinnings of $do_{code}$ are extensible to exploring different model properties, we provide a concrete instantiation that aims to mitigate the impact of spurious correlations by grounding explanations of model behavior in properties of programming languages. To demonstrate the practical benefit of $do_{code}$, we illustrate the insights that our framework can provide by performing a case study on two popular deep learning architectures and ten NCMs. The results of this case study illustrate that our studied NCMs are sensitive to changes in code syntax. All our NCMs, except for the BERT-like model, statistically learn to predict tokens related to blocks of code (\eg brackets, parenthesis, semicolon) with less confounding bias as compared to other programming language constructs. These insights demonstrate the potential of $do_{code}$ as a useful method to detect and facilitate the elimination of confounding bias in NCMs.

Related papers

• EmbedLLM: Learning Compact Representations of Large Language Models [28.49433308281983]
  We propose EmbedLLM, a framework designed to learn compact vector representations of Large Language Models. We introduce an encoder-decoder approach for learning such embeddings, along with a systematic framework to evaluate their effectiveness. Empirical results show that EmbedLLM outperforms prior methods in model routing both in accuracy and latency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T05:43:24Z)
• Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelines [74.42485647685272]
  We focus on Generative Masked Language Models (GMLMs) We train a model to fit conditional probabilities of the data distribution via masking, which are subsequently used as inputs to a Markov Chain to draw samples from the model. We adapt the T5 model for iteratively-refined parallel decoding, achieving 2-3x speedup in machine translation with minimal sacrifice in quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T18:00:00Z)
• Perplexed: Understanding When Large Language Models are Confused [3.4208414448496027]
  This paper introduces perplexed, a library for exploring where a language model is perplexed. We conducted a case study focused on Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation using an additional tool we built to help with the analysis of code models called codetokenizer. We found that our studied code LLMs had their worst performance on coding structures where the code was not syntactically correct.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T22:03:39Z)
• Evaluating and Explaining Large Language Models for Code Using Syntactic Structures [74.93762031957883]
  This paper introduces ASTxplainer, an explainability method specific to Large Language Models for code. At its core, ASTxplainer provides an automated method for aligning token predictions with AST nodes. We perform an empirical evaluation on 12 popular LLMs for code using a curated dataset of the most popular GitHub projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T18:50:57Z)
• Language models are weak learners [71.33837923104808]
  We show that prompt-based large language models can operate effectively as weak learners. We incorporate these models into a boosting approach, which can leverage the knowledge within the model to outperform traditional tree-based boosting. Results illustrate the potential for prompt-based LLMs to function not just as few-shot learners themselves, but as components of larger machine learning pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-25T02:39:19Z)
• Great Truths are Always Simple: A Rather Simple Knowledge Encoder for Enhancing the Commonsense Reasoning Capacity of Pre-Trained Models [89.98762327725112]
  Commonsense reasoning in natural language is a desired ability of artificial intelligent systems. For solving complex commonsense reasoning tasks, a typical solution is to enhance pre-trained language models(PTMs) with a knowledge-aware graph neural network(GNN) encoder. Despite the effectiveness, these approaches are built on heavy architectures, and can't clearly explain how external knowledge resources improve the reasoning capacity of PTMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T01:27:36Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations for Models of Code [11.678590247866534]
  Machine learning (ML) models play an increasingly prevalent role in many software engineering tasks. It can be difficult for developers to understand why the model came to a certain conclusion and how to act upon the model's prediction. This paper explores counterfactual explanations for models of source code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-10T14:44:19Z)
• Explaining and Improving Model Behavior with k Nearest Neighbor Representations [107.24850861390196]
  We propose using k nearest neighbor representations to identify training examples responsible for a model's predictions. We show that kNN representations are effective at uncovering learned spurious associations. Our results indicate that the kNN approach makes the finetuned model more robust to adversarial inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-18T16:55:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.