A Systematic Literature Review of Human-Centered, Ethical, and
Responsible AI
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05284v3
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 12:46:23 GMT
- Title: A Systematic Literature Review of Human-Centered, Ethical, and
Responsible AI
- Authors: Mohammad Tahaei, Marios Constantinides, Daniele Quercia, Michael
Muller
- Abstract summary: We review and analyze 164 research papers from leading conferences in ethical, social, and human factors of AI.
We find that the current emphasis on governance and fairness in AI research may not adequately address the potential unforeseen and unknown implications of AI.
- Score: 12.456385305888341
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: As Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to advance rapidly, it becomes
increasingly important to consider AI's ethical and societal implications. In
this paper, we present a bottom-up mapping of the current state of research at
the intersection of Human-Centered AI, Ethical, and Responsible AI (HCER-AI) by
thematically reviewing and analyzing 164 research papers from leading
conferences in ethical, social, and human factors of AI: AIES, CHI, CSCW, and
FAccT. The ongoing research in HCER-AI places emphasis on governance, fairness,
and explainability. These conferences, however, concentrate on specific themes
rather than encompassing all aspects. While AIES has fewer papers on HCER-AI,
it emphasizes governance and rarely publishes papers about privacy, security,
and human flourishing. FAccT publishes more on governance and lacks papers on
privacy, security, and human flourishing. CHI and CSCW, as more established
conferences, have a broader research portfolio. We find that the current
emphasis on governance and fairness in AI research may not adequately address
the potential unforeseen and unknown implications of AI. Therefore, we
recommend that future research should expand its scope and diversify resources
to prepare for these potential consequences. This could involve exploring
additional areas such as privacy, security, human flourishing, and
explainability.
Related papers
- Responsible AI for Earth Observation [10.380878519901998]
We systematically define the intersection of AI and EO, with a central focus on responsible AI practices.
We identify several critical components guiding this exploration from both academia and industry perspectives.
The paper explores potential opportunities and emerging trends, providing valuable insights for future research endeavors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T14:47:27Z) - The Narrow Depth and Breadth of Corporate Responsible AI Research [3.364518262921329]
We show that the majority of AI firms show limited or no engagement in this critical subfield of AI.
Leading AI firms exhibit significantly lower output in responsible AI research compared to their conventional AI research.
Our results highlight the urgent need for industry to publicly engage in responsible AI research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-20T17:26:43Z) - The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants [53.89899371095332]
This paper focuses on the opportunities and the ethical and societal risks posed by advanced AI assistants.
We define advanced AI assistants as artificial agents with natural language interfaces, whose function is to plan and execute sequences of actions on behalf of a user.
We consider the deployment of advanced assistants at a societal scale, focusing on cooperation, equity and access, misinformation, economic impact, the environment and how best to evaluate advanced AI assistants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T23:18:46Z) - Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice [63.20307830884542]
Next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution.
Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts.
We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-06T22:18:31Z) - Applications, challenges and ethical issues of AI and ChatGPT in
education [0.0]
Artificial Intelligence in recent years has shown an unprecedentedly impressive development.
This paper aims to describe the opportunities emerging from the use of artificial intelligence and ChatGPT to improve education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-22T14:48:13Z) - The Global Impact of AI-Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances and
Future Directions, A Review [0.0]
The article highlights the implications of AI, including its impact on economic, ethical, social, security & privacy, and job displacement aspects.
It discusses the ethical concerns surrounding AI development, including issues of bias, security, and privacy violations.
The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of public engagement and education to promote awareness and understanding of AI's impact on society at large.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-22T00:41:21Z) - Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Current & Future
Trends [76.94037394832931]
In recent years, the CHI community has seen significant growth in research on Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence.
All of this work is aimed at developing AI that benefits humanity while being grounded in human rights and ethics, and reducing the potential harms of AI.
In this special interest group, we aim to bring together researchers from academia and industry interested in these topics to map current and future research trends.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-16T08:59:42Z) - AI Challenges for Society and Ethics [0.0]
Artificial intelligence is already being applied in and impacting many important sectors in society, including healthcare, finance, and policing.
The role of AI governance is ultimately to take practical steps to mitigate this risk of harm while enabling the benefits of innovation in AI.
It also requires thinking through the normative question of what beneficial use of AI in society looks like, which is equally challenging.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-22T13:33:11Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being.
For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.