Multi objective Fitness Dependent Optimizer Algorithm

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05519v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 06:33:53 GMT
• Title: Multi objective Fitness Dependent Optimizer Algorithm
• Authors: Jaza M. Abdullah, Tarik A. Rashid, Bestan B. Maaroof, Seyedali Mirjalili
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes the multi objective variant of the recently introduced fitness dependent (FDO) The algorithm is called a Multi objective Fitness Dependent (MOFDO) and is equipped with all five types of knowledge (situational, normative, topographical, domain, and historical knowledge) as in FDO. It is observed that the proposed algorithm successfully provides a wide variety of well-distributed feasible solutions, which enable the decision-makers to have more applicable-comfort choices to consider.
• Score: 19.535715565093764
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper proposes the multi objective variant of the recently introduced fitness dependent optimizer (FDO). The algorithm is called a Multi objective Fitness Dependent Optimizer (MOFDO) and is equipped with all five types of knowledge (situational, normative, topographical, domain, and historical knowledge) as in FDO. MOFDO is tested on two standard benchmarks for the performance-proof purpose; classical ZDT test functions, which is a widespread test suite that takes its name from its authors Zitzler, Deb, and Thiele, and on IEEE Congress of Evolutionary Computation benchmark (CEC 2019) multi modal multi objective functions. MOFDO results are compared to the latest variant of multi objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO), non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm third improvement (NSGA-III), and multi objective dragonfly algorithm (MODA). The comparative study shows the superiority of MOFDO in most cases and comparative results in other cases. Moreover, MOFDO is used for optimizing real-world engineering problems (e.g., welded beam design problems). It is observed that the proposed algorithm successfully provides a wide variety of well-distributed feasible solutions, which enable the decision-makers to have more applicable-comfort choices to consider.

Related papers

• LLaMA-Berry: Pairwise Optimization for O1-like Olympiad-Level Mathematical Reasoning [56.273799410256075]
  The framework combines Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with iterative Self-Refine to optimize the reasoning path. The framework has been tested on general and advanced benchmarks, showing superior performance in terms of search efficiency and problem-solving capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T18:12:29Z)
• Modified-Improved Fitness Dependent Optimizer for Complex and Engineering Problems [5.078139820108554]
  Fitness dependent (FDO) is considered one of the novel swarm intelligent algorithms. This study proposes a modified version of IFDO, called M-IFDO. M-IFDO is compared against five state-of-the-art algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T07:47:23Z)
• Decoding-Time Language Model Alignment with Multiple Objectives [116.42095026960598]
  Existing methods primarily focus on optimizing LMs for a single reward function, limiting their adaptability to varied objectives. Here, we propose $textbfmulti-objective decoding (MOD)$, a decoding-time algorithm that outputs the next token from a linear combination of predictions. We show why existing approaches can be sub-optimal even in natural settings and obtain optimality guarantees for our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T02:46:30Z)
• Evolutionary Solution Adaption for Multi-Objective Metal Cutting Process Optimization [59.45414406974091]
  We introduce a framework for system flexibility that allows us to study the ability of an algorithm to transfer solutions from previous optimization tasks. We study the flexibility of NSGA-II, which we extend by two variants: 1) varying goals, that optimize solutions for two tasks simultaneously to obtain in-between source solutions expected to be more adaptable, and 2) active-inactive genotype, that accommodates different possibilities that can be activated or deactivated. Results show that adaption with standard NSGA-II greatly reduces the number of evaluations required for optimization to a target goal, while the proposed variants further improve the adaption costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T12:07:50Z)
• An Empirical Evaluation of Zeroth-Order Optimization Methods on AI-driven Molecule Optimization [78.36413169647408]
  We study the effectiveness of various ZO optimization methods for optimizing molecular objectives. We show the advantages of ZO sign-based gradient descent (ZO-signGD) We demonstrate the potential effectiveness of ZO optimization methods on widely used benchmark tasks from the Guacamol suite.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T01:58:10Z)
• Multi-Objective GFlowNets [59.16787189214784]
  We study the problem of generating diverse candidates in the context of Multi-Objective Optimization. In many applications of machine learning such as drug discovery and material design, the goal is to generate candidates which simultaneously optimize a set of potentially conflicting objectives. We propose Multi-Objective GFlowNets (MOGFNs), a novel method for generating diverse optimal solutions, based on GFlowNets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T16:15:36Z)
• Enhanced Opposition Differential Evolution Algorithm for Multimodal Optimization [0.2538209532048866]
  Most of the real-world problems are multimodal in nature that consists of multiple optimum values. Classical gradient-based methods fail for optimization problems in which the objective functions are either discontinuous or non-differentiable. We have proposed an algorithm known as Enhanced Opposition Differential Evolution (EODE) algorithm to solve the MMOPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-23T16:18:27Z)
• A Simple Evolutionary Algorithm for Multi-modal Multi-objective Optimization [0.0]
  We introduce a steady-state evolutionary algorithm for solving multi-modal, multi-objective optimization problems (MMOPs) We report its performance on 21 MMOPs from various test suites that are widely used for benchmarking using a low computational budget of 1000 function evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-18T03:31:11Z)
• Result Diversification by Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms with Theoretical Guarantees [94.72461292387146]
  We propose to reformulate the result diversification problem as a bi-objective search problem, and solve it by a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (EA) We theoretically prove that the GSEMO can achieve the optimal-time approximation ratio, $1/2$. When the objective function changes dynamically, the GSEMO can maintain this approximation ratio in running time, addressing the open question proposed by Borodin et al.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T14:00:22Z)
• Decomposition in Decision and Objective Space for Multi-Modal Multi-Objective Optimization [15.681236469530397]
  Multi-modal multi-objective optimization problems (MMMOPs) have multiple subsets within the Pareto-optimal Set. Prevalent multi-objective evolutionary algorithms are not purely designed to search for multiple solution subsets, whereas, algorithms designed for MMMOPs demonstrate degraded performance in the objective space. This motivates the design of better algorithms for addressing MMMOPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-04T03:18:47Z)
• Hybrid Adaptive Evolutionary Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization [0.0]
  This paper proposed a new Multi-objective Algorithm as an extension of the Hybrid Adaptive Evolutionary algorithm (HAEA) called MoHAEA. MoHAEA is compared with four states of the art MOEAs, namely MOEA/D, pa$lambda$-MOEA/D, MOEA/D-AWA, and NSGA-II.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T02:16:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.