Improved Regret Bounds for Linear Adversarial MDPs via Linear Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06834v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 05:15:23 GMT
• Title: Improved Regret Bounds for Linear Adversarial MDPs via Linear Optimization
• Authors: Fang Kong, Xiangcheng Zhang, Baoxiang Wang, Shuai Li
• Abstract summary: Learning Markov decision processes (MDP) in an adversarial environment has been a challenging problem. State-of-the-art results for linear adversarial MDP achieve a regret of $tildeO(K6/7)$ ($K$ denotes the number of episodes) We investigate the problem with a new view, which reduces linear MDP into linear optimization by subtly setting the feature maps of the bandit arms of linear optimization.
• Score: 19.09749538491176
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Learning Markov decision processes (MDP) in an adversarial environment has been a challenging problem. The problem becomes even more challenging with function approximation, since the underlying structure of the loss function and transition kernel are especially hard to estimate in a varying environment. In fact, the state-of-the-art results for linear adversarial MDP achieve a regret of $\tilde{O}(K^{6/7})$ ($K$ denotes the number of episodes), which admits a large room for improvement. In this paper, we investigate the problem with a new view, which reduces linear MDP into linear optimization by subtly setting the feature maps of the bandit arms of linear optimization. This new technique, under an exploratory assumption, yields an improved bound of $\tilde{O}(K^{4/5})$ for linear adversarial MDP without access to a transition simulator. The new view could be of independent interest for solving other MDP problems that possess a linear structure.

Related papers

• Learning Infinite-Horizon Average-Reward Linear Mixture MDPs of Bounded Span [16.49229317664822]
  This paper proposes a computationally tractable algorithm for learning infinite-horizon average-reward linear mixture Markov decision processes (MDPs) Our algorithm for linear mixture MDPs achieves a nearly minimax optimal regret upper bound of $widetildemathcalO(dsqrtmathrmsp(v*)T)$ over $T$ time steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T05:45:50Z)
• A Stochastic Approach to Bi-Level Optimization for Hyperparameter Optimization and Meta Learning [74.80956524812714]
  We tackle the general differentiable meta learning problem that is ubiquitous in modern deep learning. These problems are often formalized as Bi-Level optimizations (BLO) We introduce a novel perspective by turning a given BLO problem into a ii optimization, where the inner loss function becomes a smooth distribution, and the outer loss becomes an expected loss over the inner distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T12:10:06Z)
• Stable Nonconvex-Nonconcave Training via Linear Interpolation [51.668052890249726]
  This paper presents a theoretical analysis of linearahead as a principled method for stabilizing (large-scale) neural network training. We argue that instabilities in the optimization process are often caused by the nonmonotonicity of the loss landscape and show how linear can help by leveraging the theory of nonexpansive operators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T12:45:12Z)
• Value-Biased Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Model-based Reinforcement Learning in Discounted Linear MDPs [16.006893624836554]
  We propose to solve linear MDPs through the lens of Value-Biased Maximum Likelihood Estimation (VBMLE) VBMLE is computationally more efficient as it only requires solving one optimization problem in each time step. In our regret analysis, we offer a generic convergence result of MLE in linear MDPs through a novel supermartingale construct.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T18:27:27Z)
• A Theoretical Analysis of Optimistic Proximal Policy Optimization in Linear Markov Decision Processes [13.466249082564213]
  We propose an optimistic variant of PPO for episodic adversarial linear MDPs with full-information feedback. Compared with existing policy-based algorithms, we achieve the state-of-the-art regret bound in both linear MDPs and adversarial linear MDPs with full information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T17:55:24Z)
• Logarithmic Switching Cost in Reinforcement Learning beyond Linear MDPs [31.673857053336352]
  We propose an algorithm that achieves the near-optimal regret with a switching cost logarithmic in the number of episodes and linear in the time-horizon $H$. We also show the doubling trick'' used in ELEANOR-LowSwitching can be further leveraged for the generalized linear function approximation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T05:14:27Z)
• Variance-Dependent Regret Bounds for Linear Bandits and Reinforcement Learning: Adaptivity and Computational Efficiency [90.40062452292091]
  We present the first computationally efficient algorithm for linear bandits with heteroscedastic noise. Our algorithm is adaptive to the unknown variance of noise and achieves an $tildeO(d sqrtsum_k = 1K sigma_k2 + d)$ regret. We also propose a variance-adaptive algorithm for linear mixture Markov decision processes (MDPs) in reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T00:17:24Z)
• A Fully Problem-Dependent Regret Lower Bound for Finite-Horizon MDPs [117.82903457289584]
  We derive a novel problem-dependent lower-bound for regret in finite-horizon Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) We show that our lower-bound is considerably smaller than in the general case and it does not scale with the minimum action gap at all. We show that this last result is attainable (up to $poly(H)$ terms, where $H$ is the horizon) by providing a regret upper-bound based on policy gaps for an optimistic algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T13:46:09Z)
• Nearly Optimal Regret for Learning Adversarial MDPs with Linear Function Approximation [92.3161051419884]
  We study the reinforcement learning for finite-horizon episodic Markov decision processes with adversarial reward and full information feedback. We show that it can achieve $tildeO(dHsqrtT)$ regret, where $H$ is the length of the episode. We also prove a matching lower bound of $tildeOmega(dHsqrtT)$ up to logarithmic factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T18:54:08Z)
• Nonstationary Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation [19.521419943509784]
  We consider reinforcement learning in episodic Markov decision processes (MDPs) with linear function approximation under drifting environment. We first develop an optimistic modification of least-squares value with periodic restart, and bound its dynamic regret when variation budgets are known. We derive the first minimax dynamic regret lower bound for nonstationary linear MDPs and as a byproduct establish a minimax regret lower bound for linear MDPs unsolved by Jin et al.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T20:07:44Z)
• Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPs with Feature Mapping [99.59319332864129]
  In this paper, we study reinforcement learning for discounted Decision (MDP) We propose a novel algorithm that makes use of the feature mapping and obtains a $tilde O(dsqrtT/ (1-gamma)2)$ regret. Our upper and lower bound results together suggest that the proposed reinforcement learning algorithm is near-optimal up to a $ (1-gamma)-0.5$ factor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T17:08:54Z)
• Upper Confidence Primal-Dual Reinforcement Learning for CMDP with Adversarial Loss [145.54544979467872]
  We consider online learning for episodically constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs) We propose a new emphupper confidence primal-dual algorithm, which only requires the trajectories sampled from the transition model. Our analysis incorporates a new high-probability drift analysis of Lagrange multiplier processes into the celebrated regret analysis of upper confidence reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T05:02:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.