Fight Fire with Fire: Hacktivists' Take on Social Media Misinformation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.07788v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:20:02 GMT
• Title: Fight Fire with Fire: Hacktivists' Take on Social Media Misinformation
• Authors: Filipo Sharevski and Benjamin Kessell
• Abstract summary: We interviewed 22 prominent hacktivists to learn their take on the increased proliferation of misinformation on social media. None of them welcomed the nefarious appropriation of trolling and memes for the purpose of political (counter)argumentation and dissemination of propaganda. We discuss the implications of these findings relative to the emergent recasting of hacktivism in defense of a constructive and factual social media discourse.
• Score: 6.421670116083633
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this study, we interviewed 22 prominent hacktivists to learn their take on the increased proliferation of misinformation on social media. We found that none of them welcomes the nefarious appropriation of trolling and memes for the purpose of political (counter)argumentation and dissemination of propaganda. True to the original hacker ethos, misinformation is seen as a threat to the democratic vision of the Internet, and as such, it must be confronted on the face with tried hacktivists' methods like deplatforming the "misinformers" and doxing or leaking data about their funding and recruitment. The majority of the hacktivists also recommended interventions for raising misinformation literacy in addition to targeted hacking campaigns. We discuss the implications of these findings relative to the emergent recasting of hacktivism in defense of a constructive and factual social media discourse.

Related papers

• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Characterizing and Detecting Propaganda-Spreading Accounts on Telegram [7.759087666892532]
  Information-based attacks on social media, such as disinformation campaigns and propaganda, are emerging cybersecurity threats. We propose a novel mechanism for detecting propaganda that capitalizes on the relationship between legitimate user messages and propaganda replies. Our method is faster, cheaper, and has a detection rate (97.6%) 11.6 percentage points higher than human moderators after seeing only one message from an account.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T11:07:27Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• Promoting and countering misinformation during Australia's 2019-2020 bushfires: A case study of polarisation [0.11470070927586014]
  misinformation blaming arson resurfaced on Twitter during Australia's unprecedented bushfires. We study Twitter communities spreading this misinformation during the population-level event, and investigate the role of online communities and bots. We find that Supporters promoted misinformation by engaging others directly with replies and mentions using hashtags and links to external sources. We speculate that the communication strategies observed here could be discoverable in other misinformation-related discussions and could inform counter-strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-10T03:44:31Z)
• Cybersecurity Misinformation Detection on Social Media: Case Studies on Phishing Reports and Zoom's Threats [1.2387676601792899]
  We propose novel approaches for detecting misinformation about cybersecurity and privacy threats on social media. We developed a framework for detecting inaccurate phishing claims on Twitter. We also proposed another framework for detecting misinformation related to Zoom's security and privacy threats on multiple platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-23T20:45:24Z)
• Characterizing Online Engagement with Disinformation and Conspiracies in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election [9.63004143218094]
  Persistent manipulation of social media has resulted in increased concerns regarding the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. We apply a detection model to separate factual from unreliable (or conspiratorial) claims analyzing a dataset of 242 million election-related tweets. We characterize account engagements with unreliable and conspiracy tweets, and with the QAnon conspiracy group, by political leaning and tweet types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-17T22:11:13Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to misinformation [71.46564239895892]
  We analyze the relationship between partisanship, echo chambers, and vulnerability to online misinformation by studying news sharing behavior on Twitter. We find that vulnerability to misinformation is most strongly influenced by partisanship for both left- and right-leaning users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T01:36:14Z)
• Russian trolls speaking Russian: Regional Twitter operations and MH17 [68.8204255655161]
  In 2018, Twitter released data on accounts identified as Russian trolls. We analyze the Russian-language operations of these trolls. We find that trolls' information campaign on the MH17 crash was the largest in terms of tweet count.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T19:48:12Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
• Beyond Trolling: Malware-Induced Misperception Attacks on Polarized Facebook Discourse [7.470506991479105]
  We introduce an alternate way of provoking or silencing social media discourse by manipulating how users perceive authentic content. Man-in-the-middle malware covertly rearranges the linguistic content of an authentic social media post and comments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T15:55:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.