Beyond Trolling: Malware-Induced Misperception Attacks on Polarized Facebook Discourse

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.03885v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 15:55:23 GMT
• Title: Beyond Trolling: Malware-Induced Misperception Attacks on Polarized Facebook Discourse
• Authors: Filipo Sharevski, Paige Treebridge, Peter Jachim, Audrey Li, Adam Babin, Jessica Westbrook
• Abstract summary: We introduce an alternate way of provoking or silencing social media discourse by manipulating how users perceive authentic content. Man-in-the-middle malware covertly rearranges the linguistic content of an authentic social media post and comments.
• Score: 7.470506991479105
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Social media trolling is a powerful tactic to manipulate public opinion on issues with a high moral component. Troll farms, as evidenced in the past, created fabricated content to provoke or silence people to share their opinion on social media during the US presidential election in 2016. In this paper, we introduce an alternate way of provoking or silencing social media discourse by manipulating how users perceive authentic content. This manipulation is performed by man-in-the-middle malware that covertly rearranges the linguistic content of an authentic social media post and comments. We call this attack Malware-Induced Misperception (MIM) because the goal is to socially engineer spiral-of-silence conditions on social media by inducing perception. We conducted experimental tests in controlled settings (N = 311) where a malware covertly altered selected words in a Facebook post about the freedom of political expression on college campuses. The empirical results (1) confirm the previous findings about the presence of the spiral-of-silence effect on social media; and (2) demonstrate that inducing misperception is an effective tactic to silence or provoke targeted users on Facebook to express their opinion on a polarizing political issue.

Related papers

• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Personal Moderation Configurations on Facebook: Exploring the Role of FoMO, Social Media Addiction, Norms, and Platform Trust [1.7223564681760166]
  Fear of missing out (FoMO) and social media addiction make Facebook users more vulnerable to content-based harms. Trust in Facebook's moderation systems also significantly affects users' engagement with personal moderation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T00:28:57Z)
• Dynamics of Ideological Biases of Social Media Users [0.0]
  We show that the evolution of online platform-wide opinion groups is driven by the desire to hold popular opinions. We focus on two social media: Twitter and Parler, on which we tracked the political biases of their users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T19:39:07Z)
• Fight Fire with Fire: Hacktivists' Take on Social Media Misinformation [6.421670116083633]
  We interviewed 22 prominent hacktivists to learn their take on the increased proliferation of misinformation on social media. None of them welcomed the nefarious appropriation of trolling and memes for the purpose of political (counter)argumentation and dissemination of propaganda. We discuss the implications of these findings relative to the emergent recasting of hacktivism in defense of a constructive and factual social media discourse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T17:20:02Z)
• Automated Sentiment and Hate Speech Analysis of Facebook Data by Employing Multilingual Transformer Models [15.823923425516078]
  We analyse the statistical distribution of hateful and negative sentiment contents within a representative Facebook dataset. We employ state-of-the-art, open-source XLM-T multilingual transformer-based language models to perform sentiment and hate speech analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-31T14:37:04Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media [50.4854427067898]
  We argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news. In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities. We propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T19:37:04Z)
• Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterspeech in Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis [51.39895377836919]
  COVID-19 has sparked racism and hate on social media targeted towards Asian communities. We study the evolution and spread of anti-Asian hate speech through the lens of Twitter. We create COVID-HATE, the largest dataset of anti-Asian hate and counterspeech spanning 14 months.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-25T21:58:09Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
• #MeToo on Campus: Studying College Sexual Assault at Scale Using Data Reported on Social Media [71.74529365205053]
  We analyze the influence of the # trend on a pool of college followers. The results show that the majority of topics embedded in those # tweets detail sexual harassment stories. There exists a significant correlation between the prevalence of this trend and official reports on several major geographical regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-16T18:05:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.