A robust statistical framework for cyber-vulnerability prioritisation under partial information in threat intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08348v4
• Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 23:12:58 GMT
• Title: A robust statistical framework for cyber-vulnerability prioritisation under partial information in threat intelligence
• Authors: Mario Angelelli, Serena Arima, Christian Catalano, Enrico Ciavolino,
• Abstract summary: This work introduces a robust statistical framework for quantitative and qualitative reasoning under uncertainty about cyber-vulnerabilities. We identify a novel accuracy measure suited for rank in variance under partial knowledge of the whole set of existing vulnerabilities. We discuss the implications of partial knowledge about cyber-vulnerabilities on threat intelligence and decision-making in operational scenarios.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Proactive cyber-risk assessment is gaining momentum due to the wide range of sectors that can benefit from the prevention of cyber-incidents by preserving integrity, confidentiality, and the availability of data. The rising attention to cybersecurity also results from the increasing connectivity of cyber-physical systems, which generates multiple sources of uncertainty about emerging cyber-vulnerabilities. This work introduces a robust statistical framework for quantitative and qualitative reasoning under uncertainty about cyber-vulnerabilities and their prioritisation. Specifically, we take advantage of mid-quantile regression to deal with ordinal risk assessments, and we compare it to current alternatives for cyber-risk ranking and graded responses. For this purpose, we identify a novel accuracy measure suited for rank invariance under partial knowledge of the whole set of existing vulnerabilities. The model is tested on both simulated and real data from selected databases that support the evaluation, exploitation, or response to cyber-vulnerabilities in realistic contexts. Such datasets allow us to compare multiple models and accuracy measures, discussing the implications of partial knowledge about cyber-vulnerabilities on threat intelligence and decision-making in operational scenarios.

Related papers

• Inherently Interpretable and Uncertainty-Aware Models for Online Learning in Cyber-Security Problems [0.22499166814992438]
  We propose a novel pipeline for online supervised learning problems in cyber-security. Our approach aims to balance predictive performance with transparency. This work contributes to the growing field of interpretable AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T12:11:08Z)
• New Emerged Security and Privacy of Pre-trained Model: a Survey and Outlook [54.24701201956833]
  Security and privacy issues have undermined users' confidence in pre-trained models. Current literature lacks a clear taxonomy of emerging attacks and defenses for pre-trained models. This taxonomy categorizes attacks and defenses into No-Change, Input-Change, and Model-Change approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T10:15:33Z)
• Cyber Risk Taxonomies: Statistical Analysis of Cybersecurity Risk Classifications [0.0]
  We argue in favour of switching the attention from goodness-of-fit and in-sample performance, to focusing on the out-of sample forecasting performance. Our results indicate that business motivated cyber risk classifications appear to be too restrictive and not flexible enough to capture the heterogeneity of cyber risk events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T04:12:34Z)
• EAIRiskBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [47.69642609574771]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EAIRiskBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Enhancing Cyber Security through Predictive Analytics: Real-Time Threat Detection and Response [0.0]
  The study uses a dataset from Kaggle with 2000 instances of network traffic and security events. The findings show that predictive analytics enhance the vigilance of threats and response time. This paper advocates for predictive analytics as an essential component for developing preventative cyber security strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T16:11:34Z)
• Threat-Informed Cyber Resilience Index: A Probabilistic Quantitative Approach to Measure Defence Effectiveness Against Cyber Attacks [0.36832029288386137]
  This paper introduces the Cyber Resilience Index (CRI), a threat-informed probabilistic approach to quantifying an organisation's defence effectiveness against cyber-attacks (campaigns) Building upon the Threat-Intelligence Based Security Assessment (TIBSA) methodology, we present a mathematical model that translates complex threat intelligence into an actionable, unified metric similar to a stock market index, that executives can understand and interact with while teams can act upon.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T17:51:48Z)
• A Data-Driven Predictive Analysis on Cyber Security Threats with Key Risk Factors [1.715270928578365]
  This paper exhibits a Machine Learning(ML) based model for predicting individuals who may be victims of cyber attacks by analyzing socioeconomic factors. We propose a novel Pertinent Features Random Forest (RF) model, which achieved maximum accuracy with 20 features (95.95%) We generated 10 important association rules and presented the framework that is rigorously evaluated on real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T09:41:24Z)
• ASSERT: Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models [65.79770974145983]
  ASSERT, Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming, consists of three methods -- semantically aligned augmentation, target bootstrapping, and adversarial knowledge injection. We partition our prompts into four safety domains for a fine-grained analysis of how the domain affects model performance. We find statistically significant performance differences of up to 11% in absolute classification accuracy among semantically related scenarios and error rates of up to 19% absolute error in zero-shot adversarial settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T17:10:28Z)
• Multi Agent System for Machine Learning Under Uncertainty in Cyber Physical Manufacturing System [78.60415450507706]
  Recent advancements in predictive machine learning has led to its application in various use cases in manufacturing. Most research focused on maximising predictive accuracy without addressing the uncertainty associated with it. In this paper, we determine the sources of uncertainty in machine learning and establish the success criteria of a machine learning system to function well under uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T10:28:05Z)
• Approaching Neural Network Uncertainty Realism [53.308409014122816]
  Quantifying or at least upper-bounding uncertainties is vital for safety-critical systems such as autonomous vehicles. We evaluate uncertainty realism -- a strict quality criterion -- with a Mahalanobis distance-based statistical test. We adopt it to the automotive domain and show that it significantly improves uncertainty realism compared to a plain encoder-decoder model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-08T11:56:12Z)
• An Uncertainty-based Human-in-the-loop System for Industrial Tool Wear Analysis [68.8204255655161]
  We show that uncertainty measures based on Monte-Carlo dropout in the context of a human-in-the-loop system increase the system's transparency and performance. A simulation study demonstrates that the uncertainty-based human-in-the-loop system increases performance for different levels of human involvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T15:47:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.