Does Machine Learning Amplify Pricing Errors in the Housing Market? -- The Economics of Machine Learning Feedback Loops

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.09438v1
• Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 23:20:57 GMT
• Title: Does Machine Learning Amplify Pricing Errors in the Housing Market? -- The Economics of Machine Learning Feedback Loops
• Authors: Nikhil Malik and Emaad Manzoor
• Abstract summary: We develop an analytical model of machine learning feedback loops in the context of the housing market. We show that feedback loops lead machine learning algorithms to become overconfident in their own accuracy. We then identify conditions where the economic payoffs for home sellers at the feedback loop equilibrium is worse off than no machine learning.
• Score: 2.5699371511994777
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning algorithms are increasingly employed to price or value homes for sale, properties for rent, rides for hire, and various other goods and services. Machine learning-based prices are typically generated by complex algorithms trained on historical sales data. However, displaying these prices to consumers anchors the realized sales prices, which will in turn become training samples for future iterations of the algorithms. The economic implications of this machine learning "feedback loop" - an indirect human-algorithm interaction - remain relatively unexplored. In this work, we develop an analytical model of machine learning feedback loops in the context of the housing market. We show that feedback loops lead machine learning algorithms to become overconfident in their own accuracy (by underestimating its error), and leads home sellers to over-rely on possibly erroneous algorithmic prices. As a consequence at the feedback loop equilibrium, sale prices can become entirely erratic (relative to true consumer preferences in absence of ML price interference). We then identify conditions (choice of ML models, seller characteristics and market characteristics) where the economic payoffs for home sellers at the feedback loop equilibrium is worse off than no machine learning. We also empirically validate primitive building blocks of our analytical model using housing market data from Zillow. We conclude by prescribing algorithmic corrective strategies to mitigate the effects of machine learning feedback loops, discuss the incentives for platforms to adopt these strategies, and discuss the role of policymakers in regulating the same.

Related papers

• Salespeople vs SalesBot: Exploring the Role of Educational Value in Conversational Recommender Systems [78.84530426424838]
  Existing conversational recommender systems often overlook users' lack of background knowledge, focusing solely on gathering preferences. We introduce SalesOps, a framework that facilitates the simulation and evaluation of such systems. We build SalesBot and ShopperBot, a pair of LLM-powered agents that can simulate either side of the framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T19:44:06Z)
• Buy when? Survival machine learning model comparison for purchase timing [0.0]
  This article examines marketing machine learning techniques such as Support Vector Machines, Genetic Algorithms, Deep Learning, and K-Means. Gender, Income, Location, PurchaseHistory, OnlineDiscounts, Interests, Promotionss and CustomerExperience all have an influence on purchasing time. The study shows that the DeepSurv model predicted purchase completion the best.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T06:40:02Z)
• VCNet: A self-explaining model for realistic counterfactual generation [52.77024349608834]
  Counterfactual explanation is a class of methods to make local explanations of machine learning decisions. We present VCNet-Variational Counter Net, a model architecture that combines a predictor and a counterfactual generator. We show that VCNet is able to both generate predictions, and to generate counterfactual explanations without having to solve another minimisation problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T08:45:32Z)
• Opinion Spam Detection: A New Approach Using Machine Learning and Network-Based Algorithms [2.062593640149623]
  Online reviews play a crucial role in helping consumers evaluate and compare products and services. Fake reviews (opinion spam) are becoming more prevalent and negatively impacting customers and service providers. We propose a new method for classifying reviewers as spammers or benign, combining machine learning with a message-passing algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T15:27:46Z)
• Finding General Equilibria in Many-Agent Economic Simulations Using Deep Reinforcement Learning [72.23843557783533]
  We show that deep reinforcement learning can discover stable solutions that are epsilon-Nash equilibria for a meta-game over agent types. Our approach is more flexible and does not need unrealistic assumptions, e.g., market clearing. We demonstrate our approach in real-business-cycle models, a representative family of DGE models, with 100 worker-consumers, 10 firms, and a government who taxes and redistributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-03T17:00:17Z)
• Online Learning of Competitive Equilibria in Exchange Economies [94.24357018178867]
  In economics, the sharing of scarce resources among multiple rational agents is a classical problem. We propose an online learning mechanism to learn agent preferences. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this mechanism through numerical simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-11T21:32:17Z)
• Taking Over the Stock Market: Adversarial Perturbations Against Algorithmic Traders [47.32228513808444]
  We present a realistic scenario in which an attacker influences algorithmic trading systems by using adversarial learning techniques. We show that when added to the input stream, our perturbation can fool the trading algorithms at future unseen data points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T06:28:05Z)
• Bid Prediction in Repeated Auctions with Learning [30.07778295477907]
  We consider the problem of bid prediction in repeated auctions using a dataset from a mainstream sponsored search auction marketplace. We propose the use of no-regret based econometrics for bid prediction, modeling players as no-regret learners with respect to a utility function. We show that the no-regret econometric methods perform comparable to state-of-the-art time-series machine learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-26T18:14:05Z)
• Hedging using reinforcement learning: Contextual $k$-Armed Bandit versus $Q$-learning [0.22940141855172028]
  We study the construction of replication strategies for contingent claims in the presence of risk and market friction. In this article, the hedging problem is viewed as an instance of a risk-averse contextual $k$-armed bandit problem. We find that the $k$-armed bandit model naturally fits to the Profit and Loss formulation of hedging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T11:34:10Z)
• Adversarial Attacks on Machine Learning Systems for High-Frequency Trading [55.30403936506338]
  We study valuation models for algorithmic trading from the perspective of adversarial machine learning. We introduce new attacks specific to this domain with size constraints that minimize attack costs. We discuss how these attacks can be used as an analysis tool to study and evaluate the robustness properties of financial models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T22:04:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.