Can a Bohmian be a Rovellian for all practical purposes?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.10597v1
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:00:56 GMT
- Title: Can a Bohmian be a Rovellian for all practical purposes?
- Authors: Aur\'elien Drezet
- Abstract summary: We first show that the mathematical formalism of RQM is immune to recent critics concerning consistency.
We also analyse the notion of interaction in RQM and provide a For All Practical Purposes (FAPP) reading of RQM comparing it with Bohmian mechanics.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The aim of this article is to discuss the preferred basis problem in
relational quantum mechanics (RQM). The issue is at the heart of quantum
mechanics and we first show that the mathematical formalism of RQM is immune to
recent critics concerning consistency. Moreover, we also analyse the notion of
interaction in RQM and provide a For All Practical Purposes (FAPP) reading of
RQM comparing it with Bohmian mechanics.
Related papers
- The Combination Problem for Relational Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
I consider various proposed solutions to the panpsychist problem, assessing the prospects for a similar solution in the context of RQM.
I argue that overall the prospects for solving RQM's combination problem look better for RQM with cross-perspective links than for orthodox versions of RQM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-28T22:40:16Z) - Rules and Meaning in Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
It pursues an investigation at an intersection of the philosophy of physics and the philosophy of semantics.
It offers a critical analysis of rival explanations of the semantic facts of standard QM.
New results include 1) a reconstruction of Einstein's incompleteness argument, which concludes that a local, separable, and categorical QM cannot exist.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T07:14:16Z) - Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions.
We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z) - The Relational Dissolution of the Quantum Measurement Problems [0.0]
The Quantum Measurement Problem is arguably one of the most debated issues in the philosophy of Quantum Mechanics.
It represents not only a technical difficulty for the standard formulation of the theory, but also a source of interpretational disputes concerning the meaning of the quantum postulates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-15T19:33:59Z) - Relative facts do not exist. Relational Quantum Mechanics is
Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics. Response to the critique by Aur\'elien
Drezet [0.0]
We point out that our critical analysis of RQM was precisely based on the most recent formulation of RQM, and that the theses in the critique are based on neither RQM assumptions nor on our arguments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-14T14:13:56Z) - Securing the Objectivity of Relative Facts in the Quantum World [0.0]
This paper compares and contrasts quantum mechanics (RQM) with a pragmatist view of quantum theory (DP)
I'll first explain important points of agreement. Then I'll point to two problems faced by RQM and sketch DP's solutions to analogous problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-05T11:23:40Z) - Correspondence Between the Energy Equipartition Theorem in Classical
Mechanics and its Phase-Space Formulation in Quantum Mechanics [62.997667081978825]
In quantum mechanics, the energy per degree of freedom is not equally distributed.
We show that in the high-temperature regime, the classical result is recovered.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-24T20:51:03Z) - Theory of Quantum Generative Learning Models with Maximum Mean
Discrepancy [67.02951777522547]
We study learnability of quantum circuit Born machines (QCBMs) and quantum generative adversarial networks (QGANs)
We first analyze the generalization ability of QCBMs and identify their superiorities when the quantum devices can directly access the target distribution.
Next, we prove how the generalization error bound of QGANs depends on the employed Ansatz, the number of qudits, and input states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-10T08:05:59Z) - Self-adjointness in Quantum Mechanics: a pedagogical path [77.34726150561087]
This paper aims to make quantum observables emerge as necessarily self-adjoint, and not merely hermitian operators.
Next to the central core of our line of reasoning, the necessity of a non-trivial declaration of a domain to associate with the formal action of an observable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-28T21:19:33Z) - Quantum-optimal-control-inspired ansatz for variational quantum
algorithms [105.54048699217668]
A central component of variational quantum algorithms (VQA) is the state-preparation circuit, also known as ansatz or variational form.
Here, we show that this approach is not always advantageous by introducing ans"atze that incorporate symmetry-breaking unitaries.
This work constitutes a first step towards the development of a more general class of symmetry-breaking ans"atze with applications to physics and chemistry problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-03T18:00:05Z) - Quantum-like modeling of the order effect in decision making: POVM
viewpoint on the Wang-Busemeyer QQ-equality [77.34726150561087]
Wang and Busemeyer invented a quantum model and approach as well as non-parametric equality (so-called QQ-equality)
This note is to test the possibility to expand the Wang-Busemeyer model by considering questions which are mathematically represented by positive operator valued measures.
But, we also showed that, in principle, it is possible to reduce expanded model to the original Wang-Busemeyer model by expanding the context of the questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2018-10-31T18:11:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.