Securing the Objectivity of Relative Facts in the Quantum World

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.01966v1
• Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 11:23:40 GMT
• Title: Securing the Objectivity of Relative Facts in the Quantum World
• Authors: Richard Healey
• Abstract summary: This paper compares and contrasts quantum mechanics (RQM) with a pragmatist view of quantum theory (DP) I'll first explain important points of agreement. Then I'll point to two problems faced by RQM and sketch DP's solutions to analogous problems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper compares and contrasts relational quantum mechanics (RQM) with a pragmatist view of quantum theory (DP). I'll first explain important points of agreement. Then I'll point to two problems faced by RQM and sketch DP's solutions to analogous problems. Since both RQM and DP have taken the Born rule to require relative facts I next say what these might be. This brings me to my main objection to RQM as originally conceived -- that its ontology of relative facts is incompatible with scientific objectivity and undercuts the evidential base of quantum theory. In contrast DP's relative facts have all the objectivity we need to accept quantum theory as scientific knowledge. But a very recent modification to RQM has successfully addressed my main objection, bringing the two views into even closer alignment.

Related papers

• Generalized Quantum Stein's Lemma and Second Law of Quantum Resource Theories [47.02222405817297]
  A fundamental question in quantum information theory is whether an analogous second law can be formulated to characterize the convertibility of resources for quantum information processing by a single function. In 2008, a promising formulation was proposed, linking resource convertibility to the optimal performance of a variant of the quantum version of hypothesis testing. In 2023, a logical gap was found in the original proof of this lemma, casting doubt on the possibility of such a formulation of the second law.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T18:00:00Z)
• Relational Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Relativism, and the Iteration of Relativity [0.0]
  The idea that the dynamical properties of quantum systems are invariably relative to other systems has recently regained currency. Are there absolute facts about the properties one system possesses relative to a specified reference, or is this again a relative matter, and so on? I conclude with some reflections on the current state of play in perspectivist versions of RQM and quantum relativism more generally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T21:48:41Z)
• Rules and Meaning in Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  It pursues an investigation at an intersection of the philosophy of physics and the philosophy of semantics. It offers a critical analysis of rival explanations of the semantic facts of standard QM. New results include 1) a reconstruction of Einstein's incompleteness argument, which concludes that a local, separable, and categorical QM cannot exist.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T07:14:16Z)
• The Relational Dissolution of the Quantum Measurement Problems [0.0]
  The Quantum Measurement Problem is arguably one of the most debated issues in the philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. It represents not only a technical difficulty for the standard formulation of the theory, but also a source of interpretational disputes concerning the meaning of the quantum postulates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T19:33:59Z)
• A dialog on the fate of information in black hole evaporation [77.34726150561087]
  We present two alternative perspectives for the resolution of Hawking's information puzzle in black hole evaporation. One of them is the central role played by the existence of the interior singularity that we expect to be replaced by a more fundamental quantum gravity formulation. Both views rely on the notion that the standard effective quantum field theoretic perspective would require some deep modifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-17T16:21:22Z)
• Fact-nets: towards a mathematical framework for relational quantum mechanics [0.0]
  The relational interpretation of quantum mechanics (RQM) has received a growing interest since its first formulation in 1996. This paper proposes a radical reformulation of the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics which is relational from the start: fact-nets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-01T10:27:38Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Assessing Relational Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  Quantum Mechanics (RQM) is an interpretation of quantum theory based on the idea of abolishing the notion of absolute states of systems. We find that RQM fails to address the conceptual problems of standard quantum mechanics--related to the lack of clarity in its behavior. We conclude that RQM is unsuccessful in its attempt to provide a satisfactory understanding of the quantum world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T17:47:28Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)
• Preferred basis, decoherence and a quantum state of the Universe [77.34726150561087]
  We review a number of issues in foundations of quantum theory and quantum cosmology. These issues can be considered as a part of the scientific legacy of H.D. Zeh.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T18:07:59Z)
• Quantum-like modeling of the order effect in decision making: POVM viewpoint on the Wang-Busemeyer QQ-equality [77.34726150561087]
  Wang and Busemeyer invented a quantum model and approach as well as non-parametric equality (so-called QQ-equality) This note is to test the possibility to expand the Wang-Busemeyer model by considering questions which are mathematically represented by positive operator valued measures. But, we also showed that, in principle, it is possible to reduce expanded model to the original Wang-Busemeyer model by expanding the context of the questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2018-10-31T18:11:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.